b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 9840375

# Shh
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:35, archived)
# Hahahaha
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:36, archived)
# arf!
everyone bought their Rage Against the Machine copy by the way?
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:37, archived)
# Nah
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:38, archived)
# Doing it today.
Fuck you Cowel I won't buy what you tell me!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:39, archived)
# *headbangs*
It's a great tune anyway, hadn't heard it in a while
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:41, archived)
# Well it'll be the only single I have two copies of:P
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:45, archived)
# Yes
Numbers are pretty close though :( Joe might just pull it back
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:41, archived)
# I already have it
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:42, archived)
# fuck off
twats everyone buying either one

I can't believe you've made me side more with the XFactor.
I'd rather have some insipid karaoke child pleasing the old dears and kids at Christmas who do care about the UK number 1 than a song from the 90s that was only popular because of swearing making a few geeks online giggle.

Why the fuck didn't you pick Slade or something vaguely Festive. Wankers

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:43, archived)
# ^ I bought it because it does this to people
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:44, archived)
# I thought the point was to buy it to piss off the XFactor fans
see, now you're confusing your motivation.
Maybe if the people teling you to do stuff had sent better instructions you wouldn't be in this mess
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:45, archived)
# what mess am I in?
I like the song so I bought it get over it Simon
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:48, archived)
# hahaha
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:53, archived)
# pfft!

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:56, archived)
# I actually like Rage Against the Machine.
My hate for the X Factor is secondary in comparison.
Might have something to do with me doing a lot of skating in the 90s, but hey ho.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:44, archived)
# they were good when they started
but now its dad rock
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:46, archived)
# does that make ac/dc, iron maiden, metalica grandad rock?
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:52, archived)
# Yes. One step away from pushing-up-the-daisies rock.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:53, archived)
# yes, pretty much
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:09, archived)
# It's Our Generation's equivalent of listnening to the Stones or The Kinks
we're getting old

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:11, archived)
# Well it's festive in that RATM are donating their profits from it to Shelter.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:52, archived)
# I didn't know that
That's awesome of them :O
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:54, archived)
# Don't buy it, though.
Apparently it makes you a 'twat' and a 'wanker'.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:57, archived)
# Well, I did buy it, but then I bought
the rest of the album, I forgot just how good it is.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:58, archived)
# It's actually a very very good album
the rest of their work: not so much
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:00, archived)
# What was that one with the super hero dude on it...
That was a good album, too
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:06, archived)
# Evil Empire?

Had some great songs, but was also sometimes a bit boring
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:13, archived)
# Evil Empire,
that's the one :)
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:17, archived)
# yay, some good comes out of it
wonder what the profits actually amount to after Sony and Simon's cut
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:05, archived)
# FUCK YOU I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME*
* Unless it's a load of people online telling me, then I'm more than happy to do it.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:46, archived)
# Seems reasonable.
Aren't we all here to 'make a few geeks online giggle'?
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:46, archived)
# I do actually like RATM but I agree with waht you're saying but mainly because
it's the point that we are being told what to buy to stop us buying what we are told to buy - personally I couldn't give a fuck!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:46, archived)
# It's a bit ironic, given the lyrics

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:01, archived)
# Yeah, but it's not like they were behind it.
And the charity angle is pretty good considering how it has snowballed. They can hardly say 'actually, don't buy it', can they?

Because then you would be doing what they told you.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:06, archived)
# :D
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:08, archived)
# because Xmas number 1's are usually shite
and this is a good tune, regardless of the swearing?

As much as I don't give much of a toss about the charts, surely you'd agree that after these insipid X factor clones getting the number 1 slot for 5 years in a row, it's time to break the cycle?
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:46, archived)
# I think it's a rubbish tune
They did much better stuff like Bombtrack or guerilla radio, the later of which, I think would have made more sense
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:50, archived)
# Know Your Enemy was best, IMO
But this was the tune everyone rallied around

*remembers my drunken teenage years and weeps openly*
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:51, archived)
# Bulls on Parade FTW.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:51, archived)
# Bombtrack Yay!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:59, archived)
# 'Renegades Of Funk' = sexy bassline
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:04, archived)
# *something about Whigfield*
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:05, archived)
# Saw her play Reading in an orange boiler suit with a bag on her head.
AMAZING.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:17, archived)
# ..
Reading
Guantanamo
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:20, archived)
# Heh, yep!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# I thought the chap who set up the group
chose it as the most popular Rage tune, and that the emphasis was on the group, their name and what they stood for?
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# It's a good job you dont know that both songs are owned by Sony...
...so it's probably just a marketing ploy to generate revenue

Because that would really nark you off

i'm sure you do know, I was just pointing it out for those that didnt
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:48, archived)
# That was the first thing I thought when I heard about it.
"What record label are RATM on?"
"Sony."
"But of course."

Couldn't have been a classic bit of NOFX, could it.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:50, archived)
# X Factor is Syco records,
Rage is Epic records,

They may both be owned by Sony, but the record labels themselves are completely independent of eachother, neither of them will see profits from the other label. Sony will, but not a whole lot, I wouldn't think.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:56, archived)
# they will both see higher profits
as each is being bought by one camp or the other to outdo their rival
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:09, archived)
# But Cowell is on the board of Sony as well
I'm pleased because it means there might be a karaoke version of it
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# But the profits will feed back to the parent company (sony)
Consolidated profit and loss accounts m'boy, it's all part of "Financial Reporting Standard 2 - Accounting for subsidiary undertakings"
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:23, archived)
# i'm not going to buy either of them
BECAUSE I'M CLEVER AND I KNOW SIMON COWELL OWNS MOST OF THE SONY MUSIC LABEL and i'm skint
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:51, archived)
# Actually Slade would have been good
I think the choice of song was more directed at Simon Cowell himself. However I the Album RATM was an iconic one not only in its orginal style but in it not using guitar effects other than that available on a guitar amp.
It inspired a lots of muscians for years to come.
If Slade had been used I don't think that it would have had the same impact.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:54, archived)
# Floral Dance - Wogan
That is all
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:10, archived)
# it would have been a beautiful thing after today's sign off
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:14, archived)
# indeed, would have been nice (in a humourous way) to get ol' Tel to the top of the charts the week he leaves :)
still, n'mind :)
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:17, archived)
# He's got a new Christmas one out
With Aled Jones!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:16, archived)
# I know this (regular listener)
the Floral dance has more of a 'humourous' tone to it, which (to me, at least) would have subverted the trite offerings by X factor a tad better.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:18, archived)
# Personally I endorse I've Got a Brand New Combine Harvester.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:31, archived)
# Womblin' merry Christmas!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:21, archived)
# Even I have limits on what I'll click ;)
maybe this for next years no. 1?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSed1K-QNMc
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# what's wrong with wombles?
also... YES!!!!"!
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:25, archived)
# personally I bought it because it will be a nice change
And it'll be funny. I don't even like the band. I'm into jazz.

:)
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:43, archived)
# yup
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:43, archived)
# I'm going to illegally download it to get into the spirit of things ;)
/misses the point
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:43, archived)
# fight the powers
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:44, archived)
# Abso-fookin-lutely!
which all this buy the RATM record seems to miss the point.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:47, archived)
# it's internet mischief and that's a good thing

without it we wouldn't have Mr. Splashypants
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:01, archived)
#
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:55, archived)
# Agreed...
save your money, don't do as you're told, even if you're told not to do it!
Sod Cowell
Sod Sony
Sod RATM
And finally,
Sod the bloody P2P networks
FTW
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:13, archived)
# hehe a good plan well executed.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:31, archived)
# yeah
might buy another though
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:55, archived)
# What does the Daily Mail say on this
I only do what it tells me to think and do
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:21, archived)
# it thinks
buying records gives you cancer
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:23, archived)
# Cancer
and my name is Larry

/floaters off
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# *head book*
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:37, archived)
# Ha ha ha, brilliant.
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:40, archived)
# "It's a TRAPPIST!"
;)
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:43, archived)
# shhh now
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:56, archived)
# Hahahahahahaha
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:50, archived)
[challenge entry] Arf!

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 9:53, archived)
#
(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:00, archived)
# :P

(, Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:27, archived)