Pretty sure it's just a bullshit scam.
it's still one person ignoring another, you just don't notice it.
(Poppet some assembly required., Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:30, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

No, you do.
Whole sub threads vanish where people are talking in reply to someone who is ignoring you.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)

Oh. I guess no one is ignoring me then, cos I haven't noticed that!

(Poppet some assembly required., Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:34, Reply)

if it can be coded so you miss the original post but not the replies, that'd be great
what's the protocol on publishing gazzes from someone who is 2.0-ing you, btw?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)

The protocol is simple
Either do it or don't bang on about it.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:34, Reply)

^ this ^

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:35, Reply)

seems fairly clear

( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:38, Reply)

Now publish it.
Please.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:39, Reply)

it's just the time involved in trawling through old gazzes that puts me off
but i will do it. enquiring minds need to know.

it's the random ones i get from lurkers that freak me out. when someone who never posts is reading what you say and then gazzing dodgy stuff about it, it's a bit... eeeeow.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:44, Reply)

At least share one of those.

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:48, Reply)

you asked........
Swipeypoos

Why don't you ever post on QOTW any more?

It is always sexeh-sexeh-time in my head when you post and I needs it.

(XXXX, Tue 31 Jul, 14:10, ignore, delete, archive, reply)
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)

Name names woman!

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)

ah no
i only do that to cunts. creepsy creeps might think i was a bitch!

like i won't tell you over a drink, however.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:56, Reply)

Drinks that you are STILL to arrange.

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:02, Reply)

argh yes
ok this week is knackered and next week is shite. how about tue 28 or wed 29??
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)

29th works.

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:18, Reply)

You mean you don't love it that the lurking sweatyhanders
are cracking one off into their wotsits over you?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:48, Reply)

kettle chips would be alright
wotsits are tasty but smell like men's feet
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)

wanking in them probably won't improve that.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:58, Reply)

That's not a very scientific approach, badge.
You should at least try it.
And don't forget your control groups.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:00, Reply)

That's going to be REALLY hard to double-blind, tangles.
You'd need - wotsits not wanked into, wotsits wanked into, and placebo wotsits both not wanked into and wanked into. And you'd have to be unaware of which packet you actually wanked into. Or if you had actually wanked at all. Shit, you'd need to be drugged and sleepwanked into the wotsits. I'll be honest, even my DoE software is going to struggle with that.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:03, Reply)

No one ever gets awarded a Nobel prize for science by complaining that it's too hard.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:06, Reply)

can it be "too hard" for wanking?

( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:08, Reply)

true dat.
Guess I'm not getting the Nobel prize for onanism then.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)

was it dorothy parker who called her parrot onan
"because he spilled his seed"?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:12, Reply)

i like the "probably"
nice caveat there
( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:01, Reply)

I'm a scientist
nothing is definitive. Except the bottomlessness of human stupidity.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:03, Reply)

and the requirement to pay taxes on it at 50%

( rachelswipe with a fork, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)

This goes for pretty much anything in life.

(Bazongaloid, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:37, Reply)