b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10793124

# you lot can pay my share
because you are and poor

that is all

(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:08, archived)
# the size of your pictures suggest you may be unaware of the "images under 100k" part of the FAQ
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:14, archived)
# Toasty ... I didn't identify you as a pixel nazi
this board needs more posters

comments like that doesn't help the cause.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:20, archived)
# calling mods nazis and arguing doesn't either
it only takes a second to up the compression. lead by example and all that :)
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:22, archived)
# *fires up popcorn maker*
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:23, archived)
# you are being very picky
are you feeling undervalued today ?
feeling the need to ascert your mod status on the board ?
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:28, archived)
#
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:29, archived)
# nope
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:30, archived)
# then stop being a drama queen
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:36, archived)
#
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:38, archived)
# says the attention seeker posting repeatedly oversized images
calm down dear, it was just a polite comment.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:38, archived)
# he angry
he eat wrong brand of basalt today.

grr! broke tooths.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:46, archived)
# I am fully calm
I haven't got much time for pedantic folk though.
especially from unsalaried community police officers and overzealous board mods
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:47, archived)
#


(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:30, archived)
# the extra size in his image is the part you didn't tax
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:37, archived)
#
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 14:15, archived)
[challenge entry] Well that's a very interesting point but it's not to be confused with the new jersey tax havens
or the jersey cow fax avoidance scheme or the cross charged plus rate accumulator scheme that's widely available in..... what's that? you want a 10 year old repost? Ok then
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:14, archived)
# Very Terry Gilliam-esque!
Good work...
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 20:05, archived)
# Furtive!
Nice to see an old meme!
(, Sat 23 Jun 2012, 5:02, archived)
# If I was in his position, and someone offered me a completely legal way to keep most of my money, I'd take it.
And if you wouldn't, then you're clearly a better man than either of us will ever be.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:15, archived)
# it's quite clever of cameron really
publicly shame a few well known names into sorting out their tax while leaving the loopholes open so his mates can keep their low tax rates.

Requires almost zero effort from him, diverts attention elsewhere and bizarrely he looks like the good guy
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:19, archived)
# The pendulum is definitely going to swing back on him, at some point.
And the sooner the smug bastard gets knocked off his moral perch, the better.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:23, archived)
# I'm hoping he's walked into a trap.
By declaring it immoral, he's going to have to justify the behaviour of his friends and family (and the fact he is doing nothing to close the loophole).

It's a popular story - hopefully the Times will run with it and name and shame MPs next.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:30, archived)
# soon as they pulled the "there are some civil servants on several hundred thousand barely paying tax" lark I knew that something was up
There's a lot of folks on under 20K a year exploiting tax loopholes, I suspect these are the real targets of all this OMG TAX brainwashing.

And yes, if I had an income of 2 million a year and I could pull only paying 100K in income tax, I'd do it.

(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:42, archived)
# I agree.
Very few people would choose to pay more tax than they have to, especially if they know that other people in their position do not.

I don't even really see Jimmy as a hypocrite for taking the piss out of a system whilst benefiting from it - he may still believe the loophole needs to be closed.

That recent Stephen King "tax me" letter got it spot on with regards to why individuals acting morally cannot do much.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:27, archived)
# He's being shamed into doing something he doesn't want to do - which is to apologise for doing absolutely nothing wrong.
And David Cameron seems remarkably keen to repeat his rabbit-in-the-headlights moment at the Leveson inquiry, when he realised his entire political career was under very close scrutiny, and decided the best way out of it was to look flustered and sip more water than any innocent man ever would.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:54, archived)
# Dick.
David Cameron I mean. How dare he come out and - unprompted - say something like that about Carr when in April he flatly refused under questioning to go into the morality of his new government advisor's dealings - "it is not appropriate for me to discuss an individual's tax position".

news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9715000/9715304.stm

So the tax avoidance schemes that were Cameron's father's line of business, through which he amassed a personal fortune in excess of £10M are OK but this scheme is bad is it?

And while I'm on the subject, since when were stand-up comedians supposed to set the moral compass for the nation FFS?

Carr's f&cked up. He's manned up. He's apologised. Let's hear every other tw@ who's used this or similar schemes do the same.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:18, archived)
# The sad thing is that people seem
to be more angry about Carr's hypocrisy than the shitty tax laws.

If he hadn't done that bankers sketch, I bet no one would have cared.

Wish Carr had tried to turn it back on Cameron in his apology, though.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:34, archived)
# I think that will take place over a fairly extended timeframe from hence forth.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:37, archived)
# because people are brainwashed into righteous indignation on demand.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:44, archived)
# I think that sums it up for me now
It's entirely possible the guy who gave him economic advice didn't actually point out a few minor details, and as long as he said "Oh don't worry, it's all perfectly legal and above board," then why would anybody not go for it?
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:41, archived)
# That sums it up very nicely in my opinion
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 14:02, archived)
# it's Jersey's fault
Get Bergerac on the case.
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 13:32, archived)
# Holy fuck this took about 10 minutes to download on my 28k fax modem!
(, Thu 21 Jun 2012, 14:27, archived)