b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 2270497 (Thread)

# no. it's gratuitously defacing a building in an offensive way
that's not engaging in debate, any more than slashing a rembrandt is.
(, Tue 4 Nov 2003, 21:51, archived)
# the building is defacing the the land in an offensive way to me
right back at ya
(, Wed 5 Nov 2003, 0:43, archived)
# only cunts
are offended by porn.

I'm offended by mosques. and synagogues, and churches, and temples. I would personally like to see all these encitements to religious zealotry demolished and replaced by Courts Furniture Warehouses. I am sure if the religious all bought nice comfy sofas and had a relaxing sit down (and a cup of tea) there would be a lot less hate in the world.

There's logic in there somewhere.
(, Wed 5 Nov 2003, 15:38, archived)
# Agreed.
This world has no place for bigoted, backward and non-tolerant collectives of people.
(, Wed 5 Nov 2003, 15:59, archived)
# Wait
Are you talking about religions or people putting offensive grafitti about?
(, Thu 6 Nov 2003, 1:58, archived)
# Like those
damn Atheists.
(, Sat 8 Nov 2003, 0:27, archived)
# I agree,
i bought a smashing bed from my local Courts the other week. They actually kept the original font by the leather sofa section too.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2003, 22:54, archived)
# WOO!
seconded.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2003, 22:55, archived)
# I wasn't suggesting it was a debate.
I don't think that slashing a Rembrandt is racist though, do you?
(, Wed 5 Nov 2003, 19:24, archived)
# No...
....but someone should slash The Rembrandts.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2003, 12:55, archived)