
whatever makes you feel most secure, smug and content..
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:11,
archived)

with your secure, smug and content political prejudices.
Nicely stereotyped, fed to you by the BBC and the Grauniad, no need for nasty, messy thinking.
Just hate Bush, hate America, hate Blair, hate liberal democratic societies. So easy.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:14,
archived)
Nicely stereotyped, fed to you by the BBC and the Grauniad, no need for nasty, messy thinking.
Just hate Bush, hate America, hate Blair, hate liberal democratic societies. So easy.

it wouldn't _be_ a liberal democracy would it? Not one worthy of the name, anyway.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:16,
archived)

there is more to intellect than mere mindless criticism.
There is also perspective and the study of history and geopolitics -- which are entirely lacking from the kneejerk stereotypical opinions posted here.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:17,
archived)
There is also perspective and the study of history and geopolitics -- which are entirely lacking from the kneejerk stereotypical opinions posted here.

There is a lot of "Bush is teh suck" on here, but you know to dismiss that as noise. Coming back at someone with "You hate democracy" is pretty mindless itself, when you know perfectly well that they don't.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:22,
archived)

but by constantly attacking people who support democracy, they are helping the enemies of democracy ... and that is wrong.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:25,
archived)

In a "I really having no idea what the fuck I'm talking about" sort of way
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:31,
archived)

eh?

Whilst I don't agree per se, evil pundit is presenting an argument that is rarely aired. The public thinks what the public is told to think.
Personally, I wouldn't be throwing that criticism at bob odour though...

( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:40,
archived)
Personally, I wouldn't be throwing that criticism at bob odour though...


it's _not_ wrong to attack and critise politicians. They _need_ criticising, they _need_ opposing, that's what democracy is, that's how it works. If you don't oppose them you just end up with what is functionally a dictatorship. I have no time for this reverence for politicians crap, they need kicking from time to time, it reminds them who's in charge: "We The People," to borrow a phrase from a certain document.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:29,
archived)

The other side, which B3tans lack, is an appreciation of the general conditions that people have lived under throughout history, and just how good we have it compared to most.
Without that perspective, the critique is mindless and irrelevant.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:32,
archived)
Without that perspective, the critique is mindless and irrelevant.

I believe that in itself could be classed as a form of oppression against individual thought
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:34,
archived)

and while I have absolutely no desire to get into this particular debate, with the greatest of respect, you have no idea whatsoever what "most" b3tans think, feel or say. You just get the odd comment or picture from perhaps a third of b3tans to go on.
So please, don't generalise like that.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:39,
archived)
So please, don't generalise like that.

... but I think that some judgements can be formed from what B3tans say, and how they react to certain things.
When someone posted "Reservoir Wogs" the other day, the board erupted in condemnation. But I don't see such condemnation for the unfair and hurtful things directed against some nationalities on this board (see the US flag toilet roll at the top of this page, for example).
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:47,
archived)
When someone posted "Reservoir Wogs" the other day, the board erupted in condemnation. But I don't see such condemnation for the unfair and hurtful things directed against some nationalities on this board (see the US flag toilet roll at the top of this page, for example).

it's _never_ irrelevant; it's a basic right, it's a fundamental part of the process of democracy. It's Voltaire, defending to the death your right to be completely wrong. It's the 1st amendment. Without the critics, without the disagreement, democracy is meaningless, defanged, not worth defending. So by all means argue with Beau and me, but don't ever accuse us of working against democracy and not appreciating it. We ARE democracy.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:38,
archived)

I just wish that sometimes the bad guys would cop a bucketing, and not just our side.
Sigh.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:41,
archived)
Sigh.

Probably because Saddam and Osama and Co. have much smaller PR departments, there's a lot less material to work on.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:45,
archived)

I think I'll go to bed now, and dream of photoshopping kittens.
Which is what I'd really rather do here -- there's enough politics elsewhere.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:49,
archived)
Which is what I'd really rather do here -- there's enough politics elsewhere.

So I assume you are joking and say ha.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:16,
archived)

But he has been banging on so long, its either a joke worn thin or a control freak forcing his opinions on us.
Either way I say "Yawn"
...Well, I dont say yawn, I just yawn, but you get the idea...
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:17,
archived)
Either way I say "Yawn"
...Well, I dont say yawn, I just yawn, but you get the idea...

yawn, weird word. Anyway, enough political bantering, I go food now.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:18,
archived)

the guardian hates liberal democratic societies now? blimey, i must not understand it at all.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:16,
archived)

... now how many has Bobodor done attacking Bush? 200? 300?
Hardly in the same class, is it?
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:27,
archived)
Hardly in the same class, is it?

even if you only did it once. It doesn't help the case.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:31,
archived)

and that is one of the facts that some people here fail to grasp. There are degrees, not just absolutes.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:34,
archived)

does producing 300 thought processes using technicques taught and freely available in a free and deomcratic society really have any relevance when judged against just one.
Simply, the notion of 'freedom' of speech throughout a chosen medium is what shows that as a 'civilised' nation we can take such critique and move on - its doesnt mean to say that 300 posts represents the majority - we have the choice of 'not listening or reasoning and following our own path' - to a greater degree than most do
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:38,
archived)
Simply, the notion of 'freedom' of speech throughout a chosen medium is what shows that as a 'civilised' nation we can take such critique and move on - its doesnt mean to say that 300 posts represents the majority - we have the choice of 'not listening or reasoning and following our own path' - to a greater degree than most do

and I just wish that people would acknowledge that, instead of saying that our society is fascist and our elected leaders are Nazi murderers.
There are really bad people in the world, who deserve that kind of characterisation far more than our own politicians.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:43,
archived)
There are really bad people in the world, who deserve that kind of characterisation far more than our own politicians.

the 'bad' guys as you so call them, do often tend to come from modertaly or greatly impoverished societies themselves
(consider the likes of many african dictators - Mugabe for instance)
If we start taking the mic out of them on a greatly enhanced platform, there is always someone, somewhere in our society who will denounce us as 'the devil incarnate' for taking the piss out of an impoverished nation, claiming 'you dont live there, what do you know' the fact is, we live HERE, hence, we KNOW what we're in, and it makes it far easier to mock what we know, and get away with it. It doesnt mean its right, but at least we ain't getting shot at for speaking our mind and testing the society we live and believe in
I think it all comes down in the end to one simple phrase...
"If they're big enough, and powerful enough, they can take it"
and most of the time, i believe its a simple as that
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:46,
archived)
(consider the likes of many african dictators - Mugabe for instance)
If we start taking the mic out of them on a greatly enhanced platform, there is always someone, somewhere in our society who will denounce us as 'the devil incarnate' for taking the piss out of an impoverished nation, claiming 'you dont live there, what do you know' the fact is, we live HERE, hence, we KNOW what we're in, and it makes it far easier to mock what we know, and get away with it. It doesnt mean its right, but at least we ain't getting shot at for speaking our mind and testing the society we live and believe in
I think it all comes down in the end to one simple phrase...
"If they're big enough, and powerful enough, they can take it"
and most of the time, i believe its a simple as that

Catch you on the 'moro
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:50,
archived)

'Hitlary Clinton'?????
yes, as you said, its SO easy to hate americans isnt it....
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:18,
archived)
yes, as you said, its SO easy to hate americans isnt it....

He did that, so its ok.
Its only wrong when someone else does it.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:20,
archived)
Its only wrong when someone else does it.

Hillary Clinton actually did kill six million Jews and invade Poland, France, Czechoslovakia etc and form alliances with Stalin, Franco and Mussolini.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:23,
archived)

AND govern America...
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:25,
archived)