b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Dr Who monsters that should have been » Message 523293

[challenge entry] look out doctor, it's the Dialects!

From the Dr Who monsters that should have been challenge. See all 261 entries (closed)

(I helped save b3ta! rogan, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:46, archived)
# that is very very
very
very
funny.
FACT
(I helped save b3ta! jiva nearly always up for a game of scrabble, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:47, archived)
# frontpage!
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:48, archived)
# It's certainly funnier
Than some of the stuff on the front page at the mo

Especially that hamster crap...
(Elvis_The_Sn@il, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:50, archived)
# We are alone
in not finding that Hamster (no P) funny
(I helped save b3ta! Bud Muhnquai Update your profile or fuck off, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:51, archived)
# I'm glad someone agrees
Considering in the original picture the guy was torturing the ppor thing
(Elvis_The_Sn@il, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:52, archived)
# I did a nice sherby last night but
it did not front.
(I helped save b3ta! jiva nearly always up for a game of scrabble, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:54, archived)
# me too.
but I did mine on paint, and as we all know, no potatoshop= No frontpage!
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:55, archived)
# that statement is not true
(I helped save b3ta! munkt0n, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:58, archived)
# well ok
but the majority of frontpagers are potatoshop! a LARGE majority!


(im not whingeing cos my stuff never gets on frontpage! honest!)
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:01, archived)
# hang on a sec
isn't that 'cos most people here use Photoshop or something of similar quality?

Do you think that might, possibly, be a factor?
(I helped save b3ta! Dr Phil Kitten, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:07, archived)
# yes.
yes it could.........



:)
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:12, archived)
# I do all my
pics in Paint Shop Pro
(I helped save b3ta! Craymen, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:44, archived)
# Somebody's not
spazzing are they. If you spazz to about 3am you'll find that the picture was taken from a site talking about hamster rash and the hands are in fact female. Get your facts right before accusing someone of torture, mmmmkay?
(I helped save b3ta! witchy is covered in BEES, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:58, archived)
# D'you think he made
a RASH judgement.

(I helped save b3ta! bovine I'm so old, even my old is old, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:59, archived)
# Yes, he may
have been ITCHING to get a statement out.
(I helped save b3ta! witchy is covered in BEES, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:03, archived)
# I have the feeling
we may only be SCRATCHING the surface.
(I helped save b3ta! bovine I'm so old, even my old is old, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:10, archived)
# Indeed. I fear
he may be turning BALMY.
(I helped save b3ta! witchy is covered in BEES, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:18, archived)
# oooh
you two wee jokers you
(ska punk ninja, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:28, archived)
# I rather like the Shermy,
at least its not No Hands.
(I helped save b3ta! bovine I'm so old, even my old is old, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:52, archived)
# I think the hamster is funny.
made me laugh.
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:53, archived)
# it's not actually that guys hamster though is it
it's from some weird asian petcare site
(I helped save b3ta! munkt0n, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:56, archived)
# Don't matter none,
Hamster funny.
(I helped save b3ta! bovine I'm so old, even my old is old, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:58, archived)
# yeah it is.
and there was an argument over whether it was being squeezed or not. Well its not, its been picked up by the scruff of its neck. Its just a funny looking hamster. And people that were saying its cruel cos it has a rash can just fuck off! How many Stephen Hawking/ Michael Barrymore/ Sep 11th/ fucking EVERYTHING that goes on B3ta posts have they laughed at? And now its unfair cos a hamsters got a rash?
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:00, archived)
# I disagree
I don't find it funny, either
(I helped save b3ta! Ptortoise, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:55, archived)
# Sorry
Morning everyone. I've been lurking for a while so I thought I may as well sign in.

Even though everyone seems to find me really annoying
(Elvis_The_Sn@il, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:51, archived)
# we only
get annoyed for the following reasons:

1, putting yourself down
2, re-posting
3, apologising for something you are realy not sorry for and finaly
4, posting not safe for work pics.
and I'm sure you don't do any of those.
(I helped save b3ta! jiva nearly always up for a game of scrabble, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:55, archived)
# you missed threadwasting.
we're not overly keen on that either.
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:56, archived)
# how about
threadjacking. can't say I'm a fan...
/sulk
(I helped save b3ta! rogan, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:59, archived)
# I dotn mind threadjacking as much.
It beats wasting a thread and pushing someones work off the page. And sometimes good stuff has come from threadjacking!
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:03, archived)
# poor rogan.
It's a very nice picture.
(I helped save b3ta! Dr Phil Kitten, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:22, archived)
# go on then
you write the rules!
(I helped save b3ta! jiva nearly always up for a game of scrabble, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:59, archived)
# thou shalt not spam.
thou shalt not threadwaste.

thou shalt not apologise when thou clearly doesnt care.

thou shalt only threadjack when thou has a relevant post to make.

thou shalt administer wooage and yayage to persons rightfully deserving so.

thou shalt not take thy hummus in vain.

thou shalt apologise for "dodgy" posts with the tag "/coat"
(I helped save b3ta! PMGT -Bacon., Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:09, archived)
# amen
whoops, am i threadwasting?
(ska punk ninja, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 10:31, archived)
# Oh God, not you again



8-)
(I helped save b3ta! thirdman Ia! Ia! R'lyeh Cthulhu ftagn! Ia! Ia! Mglui nafl, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:56, archived)
# hahaha
nice one!!
:)
(I helped save b3ta! monkeymanblue mathematically safe, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 9:50, archived)
# *grin*
(Padfoot, Tue 3 Dec 2002, 23:13, archived)