Meh
From the Selling Celibacy challenge. See all 240 entries (closed)
( , Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
From the Selling Celibacy challenge. See all 240 entries (closed)
( , Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
you stretched the top one too much
so other than the hair, there is really no difference
*whistles*
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32,
archived)
*whistles*
anybody who makes jokes about shagging fat birds has never done it!
great fun!
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:33,
archived)
hahaha ^this
I bet the bottom one is a much better shag :)
Though I wouldn't like to find out the hard way
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:34,
archived)
Though I wouldn't like to find out the hard way
why does everyone think that?
just cause ugly girls are ugly doesn't mean they're better in bed.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35,
archived)
I mean I guess it's nice that ugly girls can get laid, but the assumption that they're better in bed is silly.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:38,
archived)
Well they're more scummy that's for sure
I wouldn't have thought they possess the imagination to be particularly fun in bed though.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:29,
archived)
Never even mentioned the word "ugly"
Who's to say she's ugly, Who's to say you're ugly? Who's to say I'm ugly?
Ugly is such an ugly word :)
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:41,
archived)
Ugly is such an ugly word :)
it's because they are more greatful
for getting some, and will have more pent up sexual frustration to expend on you, so tend to be fucking wild compared to ms. IcanGetItAnyTime who will, lets face it, be as loose as a bucket of water.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:26,
archived)
as Zappa used to say
the bigger the cusion
the better the pushin'
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37,
archived)
the better the pushin'
PS
Found bottom one here:
www.pornotube.com/media.php?m=23891
NSFW, obviously
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37,
archived)
www.pornotube.com/media.php?m=23891
NSFW, obviously