b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 6848639

# It's not big and it's not clever...
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 11:56, archived)
# Free the weed!
wooo!
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 11:57, archived)
# mabie if we all stop voting
they'll give up and go away
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 11:58, archived)
# they seem to like it more when that happens
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:00, archived)
# hmm
that would explain alot, now excuse me i have to pop out and buy a honour before the sale ends
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:02, archived)
# they need a "none of the above" box to tick
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:10, archived)
# oh they couldn't possibly do that
it would probably push voter turnout up
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:12, archived)
# someone should form thier own party
called none of the above, easy victory
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:16, archived)
# there is, deliberately foul you paper.
that way it shows that you will turn up to vote, but you don't want to vote for any of them.
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:25, archived)
# this fact needs to be more widely spread thoughtout the land
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:30, archived)
# of course, with neo labour
whose to say that a spoiled ballot paper is one in which "people didn't vote labour"
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:34, archived)
# it's the only sensible option.
i'd do it myself but i'm just gonna move to holland instead. only 3 days left!!!
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:35, archived)
# blimey
sounds nice
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:38, archived)
# did someone steal Cammo`s Kit Kat?

have a woo
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 11:57, archived)
# Yes, but left a tampon in the wrapper...
...to hide the crime!
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:01, archived)
# at least it`s one with a silky applicator
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:02, archived)
# Chasing the Lillet or...
...mainlining Tampax?
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:09, archived)
# always the mainline
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:11, archived)
# Wise choice...
...they're buggers to light.
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:15, archived)
# when are they gonna legalise this* so they can tax the livin daylights out of it?
bastards!
*all drugs
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 11:59, archived)
# high taxation
would damage my subsequent snak food industry subsidies, and be bad for the economy
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:00, archived)
# probably shortly after they bring in the smoking ban and start losing shitloads of money they`ve come to depend on
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:00, archived)
# My my Rik,
We ARE Mr Cynical this morning!
:)
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:02, archived)
# evry time someone quits
it costs gordan 100,000 pounds
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:03, archived)
# well
if they would have smoked 60 a day for twenty years at a fiver a pack, maybe
:P

I gave up 9 months ago. I calculate that I wasted about 35 grand on smokes (20 a day, 20 years).
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:09, archived)
# the 100,000
is whats left after you subtract the cost of NHS healthcare for smoking related illnesses
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:11, archived)
# which tobacco revenue more than covers
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:43, archived)
# well it`s just past mid day
let`s start the afternoon in the same fashion!
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:07, archived)
# crack cocaine?!?!?!
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:01, archived)
# can help weight loss
as part of a sensible diet
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:03, archived)
# so could a block of lard
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:08, archived)
# but you would still have to freebase it
to get the most out of your lard
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:09, archived)
# i`ve a spare car battery if you can collect
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:12, archived)
# nah, just fedex it
Im not driving to wherever you live
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:13, archived)
# Taxed legalised drugs wouldnt be as good quality
as the untaxed ones on the street.

Unless the Gov actually start funding it... hmm, Gov grown gear anyone?
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:04, archived)
# hmm goverment drugs
only if the politicans would take them themselves, to ensure quality control
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:06, archived)
# they do already
but when they break the law they don't get sentenced, as they do an "important job" hahaha

twats
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:08, archived)
# when big ben goes
"bong" its moking us without a constiuency
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:12, archived)
# The artificial outrage of
this 'news' really pisses me off.
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 12:10, archived)
# haha
works on more than one level !
(, Sun 11 Feb 2007, 19:11, archived)