Total cow
From the Photoshop The Beatles challenge. See all 439 entries (closed)
( , Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:16, archived)
From the Photoshop The Beatles challenge. See all 439 entries (closed)
( , Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:16, archived)
Cheers :-)
In some countries, both cows in this pictures would be considered holy...
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:21,
archived)
it probably is my favorite of your pics.
though i am suffering from a withdrawal of "TO CHINA!"
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:21,
archived)
*shrugs*
It was ages ago, you and another board member were both watching ToD and drawing along. 'twas funny.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:43,
archived)
At least I have a new desktop. ;]
Do you want me to put a password on the file?
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:30,
archived)
No nudity here! I promise :]
She's worried that someone will find the picture I drew her because she thinks it's going to look rubbish :P
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:34,
archived)
itws actually the same swize rather than bigger though
i think i have a larger version around though..
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:21,
archived)
So good to see the nightshifters are still hard at work
*edit* needs more doc dyslexia
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:18,
archived)
OH HEY.
I'M AT VOLCANO FORGE POINT. SOON A CHUNK OF DINOSAUR PLANET WILL BE SAVED.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:20,
archived)
how many times are you nt going to
read the faq regarding size of images?
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:28,
archived)
Does it even matter?
It's under the filesize limit, and you have adblock anyway.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:31,
archived)
since he's a noob
that would make you technically more guilty of that than he is, having been here a lot longer to not read the faq more often
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:32,
archived)
he was told last night, Numerous times if I recall.
He had all the time to sort it out. I don't recall them removing the bit saying but you will rarely need to make your image larger than 400 pixels wide.
It's hardly difficult and highly courteous to link to a bigger image.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:43,
archived)
It's hardly difficult and highly courteous to link to a bigger image.
But where does it say it's a rule to post anything bigger than a certain width?
Nowhere.
Leave the poor noob alone, I'm having flashbacks.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:46,
archived)
Leave the poor noob alone, I'm having flashbacks.
Meh.
I can understand the bandwidth thing, but dimensions?
Unless you're on capped scrolling.
Ultimately the post is funny, ergo it's justified.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:50,
archived)
Unless you're on capped scrolling.
Ultimately the post is funny, ergo it's justified.
funny?
Odd, I'll accept. Maybe it's just me but I can remember everything getting shouted at when I started if it was over 400px wide. Mind you those same paupers had shitty little monitors on 800x600 at best.
Perhaps its just me but they provided us with hosting and auto thumbnailing I think it is polite to use it.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:55,
archived)
Perhaps its just me but they provided us with hosting and auto thumbnailing I think it is polite to use it.
The fatal flaw here is that you're assuming b3ta is, in fact, polite.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:57,
archived)
I only really get fucked of with people flaunting 'the rules' if the idea is shit and / or it's not funny / well executed. I found this funny so don't really see the problem.
'Politeness' and 'neatness' seem a little bit bureaucratic for a place that's supposedly meant to be about having a laugh.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 2:04,
archived)
'Politeness' and 'neatness' seem a little bit bureaucratic for a place that's supposedly meant to be about having a laugh.
SIZE OF IMAGE
Regarding the size of images I am going to not read the faq approximately another 200 times per 15 minutes as the narcissistic lobe in my brain takes over and I keep refreshing the page to read people's comments. Then again, maybe I'll eat the faq and feed complainers to Heather Mills where they'll be processed in her ride's four different stomachs, then shat back into her mouth.
Rest assured I will not not also make future images not this big.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:39,
archived)
Rest assured I will not not also make future images not this big.
please do, I like 'em big.
also ignore that guy, he's a total jerkoff
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:40,
archived)
also ignore that guy, he's a total jerkoff
Hah.
Seriously, don't worry about it.
The FAQ is a GUIDELINE that says pictures RARELY need to be over 400px in width.
Nowhere in there does it say you CAN'T post anything bigger.
And it's under the filesize limit, so you are absolutely fine.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:43,
archived)
The FAQ is a GUIDELINE that says pictures RARELY need to be over 400px in width.
Nowhere in there does it say you CAN'T post anything bigger.
And it's under the filesize limit, so you are absolutely fine.
It's not just about the filesize
and I know you made that parameter ( I don't give a fuck, it's about time the paupers got proper internet ;) sorry Flowerpot, not you )
it's about an image filling the whole screen. There is just no need, it's untidy. I know you want people to see your creations in all their glory but load them to b3ta hosting and use the click for bigger option. Let the viewer decide if they want to fill the screen with it.
That's the honest, not taking the piss reply.
And welcome. I didn't say it last night because I'm usually an ignorant cunt.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:47,
archived)
it's about an image filling the whole screen. There is just no need, it's untidy. I know you want people to see your creations in all their glory but load them to b3ta hosting and use the click for bigger option. Let the viewer decide if they want to fill the screen with it.
That's the honest, not taking the piss reply.
And welcome. I didn't say it last night because I'm usually an ignorant cunt.
GO ON, TELL US ABOUT YOUR GINORMOUS MONITORS AGAIN
YOU KNOW, THE ONES IN INVERSE PROPORTION TO YOUR GENITALIA
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:53,
archived)
YOU KNOW, THE ONES IN INVERSE PROPORTION TO YOUR GENITALIA