wasn't his idea though
and don't think he's making all that much from it (compared to the contracts he has on his own books)
( ,
Thu 29 May 2008, 15:13,
archived)
hmm, maybe
books about james bond have written but there was no need to focus on it being written as fleming, it is madness. I like Faulks' work I do but Ian Fleming is he not.
*searches for pipe*
( ,
Thu 29 May 2008, 15:21,
archived)
*searches for pipe*
In fairness Faulks only claimed to have gotten 80% Fleming
which is enough, imho.
( ,
Thu 29 May 2008, 15:28,
archived)
you know that sounds like Faulks has taken the essence of Fleming
and incorporated him into his own DNA but only got 80% complete.
Or did I miss the joke?
It's been a long day and I've been asleep for most of it
( ,
Thu 29 May 2008, 15:34,
archived)
Or did I miss the joke?
It's been a long day and I've been asleep for most of it
well ian flemings estate approached faulks and asked him if he'd do it
when he said yes faulks decided to approach the work in a similar way to that of fleming writing the book in about six weeks.
i see nothing wrong as this is an officially sanctioned novel to mark what would have been flemings 100th birthday.
( ,
Thu 29 May 2008, 15:51,
archived)
i see nothing wrong as this is an officially sanctioned novel to mark what would have been flemings 100th birthday.