..
From the Famous Tart Cards challenge. See all 307 entries (closed)
( , Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:37, archived)
From the Famous Tart Cards challenge. See all 307 entries (closed)
( , Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:37, archived)
yes
*cums in your chocolate*
/used to work for a chocolate manufacturer
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:40,
archived)
/used to work for a chocolate manufacturer
good chocolate or crap chocolate?
i thought about studying it years ago but gave up on the idea.
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:43,
archived)
*checks this weeks image challenge*
*thinks of something about Laura Prepon*
*gets distracted*
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:41,
archived)
*gets distracted*
good idea, but...
...minus three points for using that sad twat johnny depp instead of gene wilder.
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:44,
archived)
Johnny Depp is Awesome.
Gene Wilder is Awesome.
They were both brilliant in their respective Willy Wonka films.
The second one shouldn't have really been made.
That is all....
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:48,
archived)
They were both brilliant in their respective Willy Wonka films.
The second one shouldn't have really been made.
That is all....
The only reason the second film has for existing are the bit parts Kevin Eldon and Mark Heap do in it.
Although I have no seen it so have no fucking idea what they actually do, apart from walk a dog I believe.
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:51,
archived)
Ha ha ha!
The second film, in my opinion is brilliant. However, it should never have been made as the original was pretty damn awesome. If it had been made and the original had not ever existed, I believe that it would be held in similar reverence to all of Tim Burtons work. But remaking films is always difficult....
( ,
Sun 8 Jun 2008, 1:59,
archived)