b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Extreme Horses! » Message 8884296

[challenge entry] Harry Trotter - flying through the air on his stick machine


Click for bigger (19KB)

From the Extreme Horses! challenge. See all 371 entries (closed)

(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:09, archived)
# you're revving up to be quite the prolific poster here on b3ta
nice!~
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:10, archived)
# I'm on holiday
and completely broke - this is free! Yay!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:11, archived)
# If you donate you get a nice icon though...
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:13, archived)
# enjoy the free ride for a while
:)
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:17, archived)
# I'm a free-rider rollacoaster, me
Lol!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:20, archived)
# lololololol
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:22, archived)
# slow down on the lols
that's lynching talk round these parts
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:24, archived)
# Really? Fuck.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:25, archived)
# LOL
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:26, archived)
# SOS, MAN. SOS.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:27, archived)
# FUCK SOS!
I'LL SEND IT OUT OVER THE ETHER, MAN

... --- ...

Don't worry, this ship's unsinkable!

/John George Phillips blog
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:29, archived)
# INTRIGUING.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:31, archived)
# FASCINATING
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:32, archived)
# lolacoaster
:)
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:25, archived)
# LOLA COASTER.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:25, archived)
# LILO COATSER
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:33, archived)
# LOLO COOSTOR.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:34, archived)
# LOW LOW COOLSTORE?
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:52, archived)
# COLA LOASTER
:)
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:35, archived)
# COLD LOBSTER?!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:52, archived)
# I like the fact that Richard Dawkins is upset about Harry Potter.
It's like the atheists have got their own Digusted of Tunbridge Wells.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:10, archived)
# :D
he's gone now - that Maths slap head's taking his chair in December... when I say 'gone' I mean he no longer has the Simonyi Professorship
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:14, archived)
# I saw him at a conference last year
and thought he was a dick. His argument seemed to be that "yah boo, I'm smarter than you, so I'm right and you are wrong, nah nah na na nah"
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:15, archived)
# I think he has some good points
I think he puts some of them across well -- although he's just as fundamentalist for the cause of scientific rigour as other people are for blind faith.

He comes across well in his books I must say.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:19, archived)
# His books are excellent
Don't get me wrong, he is an brilliant writer, I just felt that in "The God Delusion", his argument against there being a God was that
1. man-made religions are full of hyprocrisy (well, naturally, as are humans)
2. It isn't logical to believe in God and if you are smart you wouldn't.

Neither of these arguments is actual proof against their being a God, just that man-made religions are a little quirky.

Me, I'm a fence sitter, so happy to look at both views. He just leaves a bad taste in my mouth (no, not like that,lol!)
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:24, archived)
# this is all very right
I lean more towards the no God camp... but all the cleverest people I have ever met or worked with - some real genius making science breakthroughs we understand the Universe better because of that they think people - are full on Christian biblical believers.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:34, archived)
# Absolutely
And lets not forget that most of the historical sciencey bods were god-lovers too, and I know a lot of people who go into science to prove their faith rather than disprove it. Personally, I'm a Pantheist at a push, which I guess is one step up from Atheism, being as I don't believe in an omnipotent being.

To me, Science is a religion in its own right -it is taking a lot of theories on faith, and its main purpose is to find the truth in the world and to make the world a better place.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:43, archived)
# the main issue is
statistically, one would conclude that there is no god, to a rather good likelihood, based on an analysis of verifiable evidence.

however, there is no proof that there definitely isn't one, as that is not a testable theory, unless god does an interview on GMTV.

Science deals only in probabilities, nothing is definitely the case, just very likely or unlikely and will remain so until strengthened or proven, but nothing is 0% and nothing is 100%.

You may all know this, but I've been writing long-winded blah all day.

The
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:46, archived)
# OH SHIT YOU'RE IN TROUBLE NOW
J. K. Rollups will have all of your money before you can say "satire."
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:11, archived)
# All 8p
Too much month at the end of the money, sigh.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:13, archived)
# Me too!
That's a great way of putting it!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:14, archived)
# Ditto
I just paid my house deposit so I'm overdrawn!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:15, archived)
# me too
... although I got paid yesterday... so - no - not me, anymore... but on Monday, yes me.
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:16, archived)
# Bigger is not really bigger is it.

IS IT?
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:14, archived)
# hahahahah!
I bet the Quidich (sp?) pitch is a mess. I guess the spectators have to bring quite sturdy umbrellas too :D
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:16, archived)
# Excreto Patronum
LoL!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:45, archived)
# Cleaning up the sky . . . stalls . . .
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:16, archived)
# SKY HORSE TO THE RESCUE!
(, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:17, archived)