Not recommended if you are Brazilian
or even a little bit swarthy looking
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:29, Share, Reply)
or even a little bit swarthy looking
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:29, Share, Reply)
clicked i like this
Not for the film, which I had seen, but your inspired title.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:34, Share, Reply)
Not for the film, which I had seen, but your inspired title.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:34, Share, Reply)
I've seen this
Credit where it's due, but, just because you can...
Also not good for multiple stops.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:35, Share, Reply)
Credit where it's due, but, just because you can...
Also not good for multiple stops.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:35, Share, Reply)
He should try doing Leicester Square to Coventry Garden. On a Saturday.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 19:23, Share, Reply)
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 19:23, Share, Reply)
so he lost
and he didn't wait for the train to be leaving, so he gave himself a head start and still the train was in the station with doors open before he got there.
rubbish
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:36, Share, Reply)
and he didn't wait for the train to be leaving, so he gave himself a head start and still the train was in the station with doors open before he got there.
rubbish
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:36, Share, Reply)
Amateur
Everyone knows that if you charge at the barriers hard enough you can force your way through.
Wasted at least 1.5s getting his Oyster out.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:36, Share, Reply)
Everyone knows that if you charge at the barriers hard enough you can force your way through.
Wasted at least 1.5s getting his Oyster out.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:36, Share, Reply)
dont think he would have made it if he'd actually used his oyster card...
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 16:39, Share, Reply)
Fake
Probably real but why make it look [possibly] fake with editing? This should have been done as a single shot or two side-by-side shots, one from the camera on his head and one from the camera on the train. This literally needed no editing. As a showcase for the production company, it is shit. Needs more 'splosions.
Also, I would like to see a map showing the route the gentleman took and the route that the train took.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 18:31, Share, Reply)
Probably real but why make it look [possibly] fake with editing? This should have been done as a single shot or two side-by-side shots, one from the camera on his head and one from the camera on the train. This literally needed no editing. As a showcase for the production company, it is shit. Needs more 'splosions.
Also, I would like to see a map showing the route the gentleman took and the route that the train took.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 18:31, Share, Reply)
Fromt he QI 1227 fact book:
"At least 109 journeys between adjacent London Tube stations are quicker to walk."
Make of that as you will.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 19:45, Share, Reply)
"At least 109 journeys between adjacent London Tube stations are quicker to walk."
Make of that as you will.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 19:45, Share, Reply)
I'm sceptical of that, certainly the very high number, and what are the parameters for the length of journey? Is it platform to platform or station entrance to station exit? Does it factor in an average waiting time? I suspect it might with the number that high. I would certainly believe it of the Paris metro though as there are dozens of stations where if your peer down the tunnel from the platform you can actually see the platform of the next station.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 19:59, Share, Reply)
I guess if you have escalators and gates vs
walking from entrance to entrance, you might be able to equalise a bunch.
Especially as you can choose your preferred entrance. Something like an entrance at the Natural History to South Kensington can be a 5 min walk. And that same entrance to Glouster Rd might be 2 mins walk.
I don't live there, so I might be getting the museums wrong.
I guess it depends on your terms. PLatform to platform would be a different matter.
But that might not be what they mean.
When I read it, I thought, two stations 'next' to each other but on different lines, even if on the same road - that is perfectly understandable - but not what is implied here.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 20:14, Share, Reply)
walking from entrance to entrance, you might be able to equalise a bunch.
Especially as you can choose your preferred entrance. Something like an entrance at the Natural History to South Kensington can be a 5 min walk. And that same entrance to Glouster Rd might be 2 mins walk.
I don't live there, so I might be getting the museums wrong.
I guess it depends on your terms. PLatform to platform would be a different matter.
But that might not be what they mean.
When I read it, I thought, two stations 'next' to each other but on different lines, even if on the same road - that is perfectly understandable - but not what is implied here.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 20:14, Share, Reply)
South Ken depends on the line. The Picadilly is deep and involves an escalator and a bit of a walk (not quite 5 mins, but I take your point). The district is barely below ground, sort of basement level, the platform is in the open air, you can see the sky. The walk to Gloucester road from South Ken is not far but getting on for ten minutes.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 21:02, Share, Reply)
There is a long walk that exits at the museum's side, which is about half the way
which is what I was thinking of. But there are bunches of examples I am sure.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 21:33, Share, Reply)
which is what I was thinking of. But there are bunches of examples I am sure.
( , Wed 17 Sep 2014, 21:33, Share, Reply)