Yes because before privatisation the trains in this country were wonderful.
Are you a child or has a brain injury impaired your memory?
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 17:31, Share, Reply)
Are you a child or has a brain injury impaired your memory?
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 17:31, Share, Reply)
No, I think I said it would remove the profit motive
For example, much of rail subsidies go directly to shareholders, rather than being re-invested to improve the network.
Prufuck - sure you've not mistaken this place for Brietbart? Both start with a 'b', which I guess might be confusing you.
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:03, Share, Reply)
For example, much of rail subsidies go directly to shareholders, rather than being re-invested to improve the network.
Prufuck - sure you've not mistaken this place for Brietbart? Both start with a 'b', which I guess might be confusing you.
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:03, Share, Reply)
Ha ha
I keep an eye on Breitbart, but it's a bit much, even for my taste. For real laughs I go to The Canary. You'd love that site. Real loony bins stuff.
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:49, Share, Reply)
I keep an eye on Breitbart, but it's a bit much, even for my taste. For real laughs I go to The Canary. You'd love that site. Real loony bins stuff.
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:49, Share, Reply)
ahem, that would be state-owned railtrack you're looking for...
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:57, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:57, Share, Reply)