do you think the lawyers of criminals are complicit in their crimes?
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 14:09, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 14:09, Share, Reply)
If you know the defendant is guity
then laugh about how you got them off, in a way, yes. I know I wouldn't do that.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 14:32, Share, Reply)
then laugh about how you got them off, in a way, yes. I know I wouldn't do that.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 14:32, Share, Reply)
well that's a load of old bollocks as I'm sure you know
"Clinton defended an accused rapist, but she did not volunteer. He pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. She laughed when recalling unusual aspects of the case."
www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/
In any case lawyers have an obligation to defend their clients to the best of their abilities
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:01, Share, Reply)
"Clinton defended an accused rapist, but she did not volunteer. He pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. She laughed when recalling unusual aspects of the case."
www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/
In any case lawyers have an obligation to defend their clients to the best of their abilities
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:01, Share, Reply)
which of the facts that have been checked are you disputing?
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:48, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:48, Share, Reply)
who writes the facts? you see this kind of shit all the time
from both sides lol. And your idea of fact checking is taking a website's word for it?
All sounds like a slippery slope to me.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:55, Share, Reply)
from both sides lol. And your idea of fact checking is taking a website's word for it?
All sounds like a slippery slope to me.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:55, Share, Reply)
where are you getting your facts from?
and who writes them? Genuinely interested.
also, aren't you UK based? I always assumed you were, but you seem very invested in Trump as if you are voting
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:57, Share, Reply)
and who writes them? Genuinely interested.
also, aren't you UK based? I always assumed you were, but you seem very invested in Trump as if you are voting
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 15:57, Share, Reply)
It's not unheard of.
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/26/eight-examples-where-fact-checking-became-opinion-/
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:12, Share, Reply)
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/26/eight-examples-where-fact-checking-became-opinion-/
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:12, Share, Reply)
oh, please
you can fuck right off with that shit.
Aye, UK. I can have issues with Hillary and not like the number of Trump posts here (mostly you I might add, you're in UK too, it's almost like you're very invested in Hillary). Just addressing the balance.
So please, you can stop being so smug.
I take my facts from her leaked documents etc. Plenty of shit about her out there, I don't see you posting any of that.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:30, Share, Reply)
you can fuck right off with that shit.
Aye, UK. I can have issues with Hillary and not like the number of Trump posts here (mostly you I might add, you're in UK too, it's almost like you're very invested in Hillary). Just addressing the balance.
So please, you can stop being so smug.
I take my facts from her leaked documents etc. Plenty of shit about her out there, I don't see you posting any of that.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:30, Share, Reply)
I wasn't being smug, I'm genuinely interested why you are so defensive about Trump
I only post things about him if they make me laugh, I don't think I've posted anything dull and wordy and serious/actually political (although my memory is terrible so that's no doubt wrong).
If I found something about Clinton that made me laugh I'd post that too.
Just so happens that she doesn't.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:38, Share, Reply)
I only post things about him if they make me laugh, I don't think I've posted anything dull and wordy and serious/actually political (although my memory is terrible so that's no doubt wrong).
If I found something about Clinton that made me laugh I'd post that too.
Just so happens that she doesn't.
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:38, Share, Reply)
ok forget the facts
Do you accept that lawyers have to act in the best interests of their clients? Even if they think they're guilty, even if they know they're guilty. And that defending a 'guilty' man is not immoral because guilt cannot generally be established before a trial and a verdict
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:49, Share, Reply)
Do you accept that lawyers have to act in the best interests of their clients? Even if they think they're guilty, even if they know they're guilty. And that defending a 'guilty' man is not immoral because guilt cannot generally be established before a trial and a verdict
( , Tue 27 Sep 2016, 16:49, Share, Reply)