More on the Savita medical/catholic heartbreaking story
You will find some people still live in the dark ages
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:14, Share, Reply)
You will find some people still live in the dark ages
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:14, Share, Reply)
Being a presumptuous type
I had only scanned the headlines the last couple of days and thought it had all happened in Iran. Even though the level of cuntery is the same wherever this happened, it is still more shocking to know that this took place in a so-called 'enlightened' country.
Cunts
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:24, Share, Reply)
I had only scanned the headlines the last couple of days and thought it had all happened in Iran. Even though the level of cuntery is the same wherever this happened, it is still more shocking to know that this took place in a so-called 'enlightened' country.
Cunts
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:24, Share, Reply)
Apparently,
there was a nun holding this sign next to the GPO in Dublin today: pic.twitter.com/cWfyRo8J.*
*Obtained from Twitter. May not actually have happened. Normal terms and conditions apply.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:44, Share, Reply)
there was a nun holding this sign next to the GPO in Dublin today: pic.twitter.com/cWfyRo8J.*
*Obtained from Twitter. May not actually have happened. Normal terms and conditions apply.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:44, Share, Reply)
That actually looks fake.
I hope it is.
A few members of my family are actually nuns, we don't discuss these things though, i'd find it hard to believe that they'd be in favour of stupid things like this judging from their character, it's hard to tell though, religious beliefs tend to make people a bit mental.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:59, Share, Reply)
I hope it is.
A few members of my family are actually nuns, we don't discuss these things though, i'd find it hard to believe that they'd be in favour of stupid things like this judging from their character, it's hard to tell though, religious beliefs tend to make people a bit mental.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:59, Share, Reply)
So, so angry about this.
The article you posted as a reply to me yesterday was pertinent.
Worth a read, if anyone missed it.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:46, Share, Reply)
The article you posted as a reply to me yesterday was pertinent.
Worth a read, if anyone missed it.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:46, Share, Reply)
Difficult one for me
The focus on this story is about abortion. Most of the facts point to it really being about a medical error. The Irish law is all about preserving life, mums as well as unborn babys. Abortion is a very emotive issue. I really, really think abortions should be rare things. There are over 200,000 in the U.K. annually. If 1 life lost in Ireland is newsworthy, what does it say about a balanced concern for loss of life.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:54, Share, Reply)
The focus on this story is about abortion. Most of the facts point to it really being about a medical error. The Irish law is all about preserving life, mums as well as unborn babys. Abortion is a very emotive issue. I really, really think abortions should be rare things. There are over 200,000 in the U.K. annually. If 1 life lost in Ireland is newsworthy, what does it say about a balanced concern for loss of life.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 9:54, Share, Reply)
What medical error?
She needed and requested an abortion and they refused on religious grounds. Fuck all to do with medicine. All to do with living in the dark ages. The Dr's responsible should be charged with murder as they surely knew the potential consequence of not giving her the abortion. If they didn't realise the potential consequence they shouldn't be practising medicine.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:00, Share, Reply)
She needed and requested an abortion and they refused on religious grounds. Fuck all to do with medicine. All to do with living in the dark ages. The Dr's responsible should be charged with murder as they surely knew the potential consequence of not giving her the abortion. If they didn't realise the potential consequence they shouldn't be practising medicine.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:00, Share, Reply)
Which begs the question: At what point, for you, does a collection of cells become "life"?
"Most of the facts point to it really being about a medical error"? I've read a lot about this case (though not on pro-life,fundamental-christian websites) and have yet to see that theory.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:05, Share, Reply)
"Most of the facts point to it really being about a medical error"? I've read a lot about this case (though not on pro-life,fundamental-christian websites) and have yet to see that theory.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:05, Share, Reply)
You almost sound sympathetic to the barbaric religious anti-abortion laws in Ireland
I hope that is a comedy account
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:16, Share, Reply)
I hope that is a comedy account
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:16, Share, Reply)
My understanding of the case is that it was not a medical error in any way.
It seems to have been the deliberate withholding of life-saving medical care in order to comply with the law. A law that the Irish Supreme Court has already ruled should be rewritten. A law that the European Court of Human Rights has demanded should be rewritten.
I don't argue that the UK has the right position here - far from it if your numbers are correct and relevant (i.e. not medically necessary). But to blanket ban a life-saving procedure under the flag of saving life is morally indefensible.
[edit] Let's do some number-crunching...
The Guardian has handily collected the data for abortions in England and Wales and Scotland (reported separately). Interestingly there were 4,149 abortions carried out on people travelling from Ireland in 2011. So not only does banning it in Ireland effectively export the problem, it actually inflates the figures that you're using to argue against it.
The 2011 census in Ireland showed a population of 4,588,252 (from here). If we assume that the population is split roughly 50/50 male/female (we can get an accurate number but I'm approximating for ease) and roughly two thirds of the females are of child-bearing age (see above), then we arrive at a figure of approx 1.5 million total females.
Combining this we find that in 2011 alone, roughly three out of every thousand Irish women of childbearing age were forced to travel to another country in order to get their pregnancy aborted.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:23, Share, Reply)
It seems to have been the deliberate withholding of life-saving medical care in order to comply with the law. A law that the Irish Supreme Court has already ruled should be rewritten. A law that the European Court of Human Rights has demanded should be rewritten.
I don't argue that the UK has the right position here - far from it if your numbers are correct and relevant (i.e. not medically necessary). But to blanket ban a life-saving procedure under the flag of saving life is morally indefensible.
[edit] Let's do some number-crunching...
The Guardian has handily collected the data for abortions in England and Wales and Scotland (reported separately). Interestingly there were 4,149 abortions carried out on people travelling from Ireland in 2011. So not only does banning it in Ireland effectively export the problem, it actually inflates the figures that you're using to argue against it.
The 2011 census in Ireland showed a population of 4,588,252 (from here). If we assume that the population is split roughly 50/50 male/female (we can get an accurate number but I'm approximating for ease) and roughly two thirds of the females are of child-bearing age (see above), then we arrive at a figure of approx 1.5 million total females.
Combining this we find that in 2011 alone, roughly three out of every thousand Irish women of childbearing age were forced to travel to another country in order to get their pregnancy aborted.
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:23, Share, Reply)
Why didn't they send her to the UK for treatment?
Just saying like.......
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:23, Share, Reply)
Just saying like.......
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:23, Share, Reply)
I think in this case it was all too sudden; she became very ill, very quickly.
...though in previous cases the authorities have prevented women considered at risk from travelling to the uk for abortions (see "Case X" which Scrunt linked to- I've put the link above).
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:40, Share, Reply)
...though in previous cases the authorities have prevented women considered at risk from travelling to the uk for abortions (see "Case X" which Scrunt linked to- I've put the link above).
( , Fri 16 Nov 2012, 10:40, Share, Reply)