Sorry it's pretty harsh viewing if real, I'm just trying to work out why it hasn't been in the news. Still skeptical that it's a publicity stunt.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 10:34, Reply)
maybe the fluid reacted badly with his hair gel or makeup instead of burning off harmlessly.
I've not much experience of foreign tv production, but why was some of it being filmed on camcorders?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 10:38, Reply)
Seems a bit iffy to me. They play patty head to try and put the flames out/add more petrol...then camera cuts away, in this day and age surely you'd keep the camera on the burning man for shits and giggles.
He also still has his hair and no melty face, Phantom of the Opera going on.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 10:52, Reply)
twitter.com/WayneHouchin
..unless he's trying to keep the hoax going.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 11:02, Reply)
His long-winded shit-house TV hoaxes are a load of dog-eggs though.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 11:14, Reply)
What's all this shit about him being attacked? As far as I can see the guy's trying to help.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 10:42, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 10:58, Reply)
How did he ignite the flame?
Why didn't his hands set on fire?
Why didn't it burn his hair off?
How did they put it out?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 13:14, Reply)
And then carry on and on and on, laughing at his horrified screams/gurgles.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2012, 13:41, Reply)
