OK, so when you argue about topics like this, you're not trying to change anybody's minds.
Rather, it's simply an opportunity to rant at people and call them stupid?

I do apologise, you're sounding more stable by the minute.
( Kroney, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:19, 1 reply, 10 years ago)

You have demonstrated that you are unable to change your mind, and are therefore an idiot.
You are as bad as someone who believes in homeopathy.

Come back with an argument against what I've said above.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:21, Reply)

What's the point in coming back with an argument
when you've proved yourself unwilling to try to change any minds? You rant and rave, seemingly for your own amusement. There is a significant difference between being unable to formulate an argument and change opinions, and being unwilling to pay any attention to a ranty, foamy-mouthed prick.
( Kroney, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:26, Reply)

Because if you actually came back with a defensible argument it would show that you weren't an idiot
but you can't, because your only argument is "benefit fraud is really significant and it's vital that it cannot happen ever", which as I've said is both an impossibility and an argument born of considering all other human beings who aren't as lucky as you to be beneath you and unworthy of assistance.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:30, Reply)

What's sad is how many of these traits you claim to despise
you display yourself.
( Kroney, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:33, Reply)

Can you please list these traits?
Because i've only pointed out one trait, singular, and if you can provide evidence that I actually look down on people who claim benefits for whatever reason then I'd love to see it.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:35, Reply)