The relevence is that you were suggesting my presumptions were without merit, by dint of being presumptions - I merely pointed out that they are, as it happens, utterly fucking correct. This is completely clear, and no amount of half-arsed back-peddling's going to make you look less of a dick.

No sense in bleating on about why I'm taking the time to reply, either. It was demonstrably your intent to create a little controversy, and you admit that the 'style' (god, I hate to use that word in relation to your bilge, which truly has none) was expressly intended to inflame. Despite your worthy protestation that you didn't write the above to 'touch nerves or create an argument', you've generalised a massive group of people as being in denial, being losers, being jealous of you (pfft), being failures, having achieved nothing, having nothing to say, and being boring. So, congratulations - I answered. Enjoying it thus far? More to the point, why are you troubling yourself to respond to someone with such a laundry-list of hideous personal failings?

Finally, and crucially - why the shuddering fuck would you imagine, for the barest fraction of a second, that I'd ever, even in my darkest, bleakest, most dispair-filled nightmares, accept relationship advice from someone who's simultaneously a whining cuckold and a borderline nonce?
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 18 Oct 2010, 20:50, 1 reply)

oh, Christ. i agree with happy phantom.
the internets will now implode.
( janet aylia y'all motherfuckers need jesus, Mon 18 Oct 2010, 21:27, closed)

oddly enough, I was thinking the same about you earlier. Unsettling, isn't it?
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 18 Oct 2010, 21:30, closed)