Well, of all the mags I get free here
it's the one I flicked through the most. Never actually read any of it obviously...
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:08,
archived)
exactly - nothing to read
I used to read it at the station, in the shop. And I still had time to spare, after reading all the 'indepth features'.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:11,
archived)
Never read that.
I wish magazines could be more like the annuals I used to read when I was a kid.
Editors could learn a lot by leafing through old copies of Look in, and Look and Learn.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:17,
archived)
Editors could learn a lot by leafing through old copies of Look in, and Look and Learn.
that's the problem with the youth of today
not enough problems solved in photostories
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:25,
archived)
Or
exploded diagrams of how aerosols work. And the details of Roman Chariot Racing.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:29,
archived)
i read that as
"exploded diagrams of how arseholes work."
Not what one would expect from a noble squire of your ilk.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:48,
archived)
Not what one would expect from a noble squire of your ilk.
yeah!
down with the revolution!
(what's wrong with Revolution btw?)
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:18,
archived)
(what's wrong with Revolution btw?)
£6.50 for about 20 pages?
I thought i was grossly overpriced and had practically turned into the 'Hello' magazine of the web... I dunno. Good intentions maybe but just diddn't seem to work somehow. I was in it too, once or twice. Apparantly it was only selling about 2000 copies.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:08,
archived)
I think it's a hard
market to sell magazines for, people who use the web tend to read about web stuff on the web.
Web.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:11,
archived)
Web.
yup
can't stand the thing, it's sick, it's wrong and it must be stopped.
(my honour is most unpleasantly tarnished)
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:20,
archived)
(my honour is most unpleasantly tarnished)