b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1703417 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I made the effort to get some sleep and to eat some food today.
As a result, I feel better than I have since wednesday last week. Small steps work!
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:18, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
Does that mean you'll be nice today?

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:19, Reply)
Don't bank on it.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:20, Reply)
Probably not. You're all a massive bunch of cunts.
But I hang around for the lols.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:20, Reply)
Please don't ignore me poppet
I can't take any more rejection on this site.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:23, Reply)
who is rejecting you, al?

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:26, Reply)
Dozer, and now Captain Placid.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:30, Reply)
Well you are a bit shit.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:31, Reply)
And you're friends with a giant cock
but we don't judge you do we.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)
Yes you do.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:35, Reply)
I certainly do.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:38, Reply)
I really don't.
You are obviously well smart and have matured a lot since you started posting on here and this comment has suddenly become really fucking creepy and I don't like it.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:39, Reply)
so al is porkylips' comedy account?
i didn't see that one coming
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:39, Reply)
I always wait until you look away before spunking.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:41, Reply)
actually, porky never hit on me
now i, too, know the cruel sting of internet rejection
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:47, Reply)
Nah I know what you mean.
I think you're right. I was a fucking self righteous and sanctimonious brat when I started posting here. Now I'm just a bitch on occasion.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:41, Reply)
Aww diddums. Did you wake up to find yourself on the receiving end of 2.0?

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:26, Reply)
i think they should change 2.0
missing tedious posts from a cunt is fine, but missing everyone else's replies is lame.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:29, Reply)
Pretty sure it's just a bullshit scam.
it's still one person ignoring another, you just don't notice it.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:30, Reply)
No, you do.
Whole sub threads vanish where people are talking in reply to someone who is ignoring you.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)
Oh. I guess no one is ignoring me then, cos I haven't noticed that!

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:34, Reply)
if it can be coded so you miss the original post but not the replies, that'd be great
what's the protocol on publishing gazzes from someone who is 2.0-ing you, btw?
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)
The protocol is simple
Either do it or don't bang on about it.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:34, Reply)
^ this ^

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:35, Reply)
seems fairly clear

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:38, Reply)
Now publish it.
Please.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:39, Reply)
it's just the time involved in trawling through old gazzes that puts me off
but i will do it. enquiring minds need to know.

it's the random ones i get from lurkers that freak me out. when someone who never posts is reading what you say and then gazzing dodgy stuff about it, it's a bit... eeeeow.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:44, Reply)
At least share one of those.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:48, Reply)
you asked........
Swipeypoos

Why don't you ever post on QOTW any more?

It is always sexeh-sexeh-time in my head when you post and I needs it.

(XXXX, Tue 31 Jul, 14:10, ignore, delete, archive, reply)
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)
Name names woman!

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)
ah no
i only do that to cunts. creepsy creeps might think i was a bitch!

like i won't tell you over a drink, however.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:56, Reply)
Drinks that you are STILL to arrange.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:02, Reply)
argh yes
ok this week is knackered and next week is shite. how about tue 28 or wed 29??
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)
29th works.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:18, Reply)
You mean you don't love it that the lurking sweatyhanders
are cracking one off into their wotsits over you?
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:48, Reply)
kettle chips would be alright
wotsits are tasty but smell like men's feet
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:55, Reply)
wanking in them probably won't improve that.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:58, Reply)
That's not a very scientific approach, badge.
You should at least try it.
And don't forget your control groups.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:00, Reply)
That's going to be REALLY hard to double-blind, tangles.
You'd need - wotsits not wanked into, wotsits wanked into, and placebo wotsits both not wanked into and wanked into. And you'd have to be unaware of which packet you actually wanked into. Or if you had actually wanked at all. Shit, you'd need to be drugged and sleepwanked into the wotsits. I'll be honest, even my DoE software is going to struggle with that.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:03, Reply)
No one ever gets awarded a Nobel prize for science by complaining that it's too hard.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:06, Reply)
can it be "too hard" for wanking?

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:08, Reply)
true dat.
Guess I'm not getting the Nobel prize for onanism then.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)
was it dorothy parker who called her parrot onan
"because he spilled his seed"?
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:12, Reply)
i like the "probably"
nice caveat there
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:01, Reply)
I'm a scientist
nothing is definitive. Except the bottomlessness of human stupidity.
(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:03, Reply)
and the requirement to pay taxes on it at 50%

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:10, Reply)
This goes for pretty much anything in life.

(, Tue 14 Aug 2012, 13:37, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1