b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10776918

#
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:28, archived)
# Haha! Well said, yer maj.
(BTW, Mr Toast, did you see John Wagner's comments on the Dredd film?)
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:32, archived)
# yes
also saw the Cannes report that said it looked cheap
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:34, archived)
# Oh dear - I managed to miss that.
Dunno about a rollercoaster of a film - it's proving a rollercoaster of a frickin' build-up, this is. :-/
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:37, archived)
# Where did you see these comments then?
And what were they?
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:53, archived)
# John Wagner's FB page...
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:05, archived)
# Ah right.
The only other word I've heard on it is from an investor and he's not likely to say it's shit, even if it is. Going off the plot details, it was never meant to be a mega epic anyway. So long as they get Dredd right and it doesn't look bobbins. I hope they do something with that bike, maybe CGI some Firerock tyres on it!
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:17, archived)
# Well
it was made on considerably less budget than your average Hollywood comic book movie.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:37, archived)
# wish I had £54million to make something look cheap :D
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:45, archived)
# Yeah, me too.
I'd make some Ferraris look cheap outside my cheap-looking mansion, whilst eating cheap smoked salmon and drinking cheap champagne and entertaining cheap women.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:48, archived)
#
tain
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:49, archived)
# Haha
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:06, archived)
# I'd wear a tracksuit and pocket the remaining £53,999,999
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:37, archived)
# man, you really bought the finest tracksuit primark has to offer
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:39, archived)
# With the biggest pockets
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 21:24, archived)
# Well, it worked for Dolly Parton.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:11, archived)
# Have your own fucking street party then, curmudgeon.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:33, archived)
# some of us don't have state funding to afford one
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:34, archived)
# I meant her, not you.
I will be celebrating in my own way*

*by doing nothing out of the ordinary, though possibly a bit of Minecraft if it's raining. Got a nice tower and some farmland, looking to build a railway to connect my various estates.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:40, archived)
# I thought the crown no longer got state funding, and is now surviving off the proceeds made from managing the land it owns?
Which is about 3x more than what the Government was giving them in the first place.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:41, archived)
# There's still the civil list
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:46, archived)
#
For example, the Crown Estate produced £200 million for the Treasury in the financial year 2007–8, whereas reported parliamentary funding for the monarch was £40 million during the same period,[102] and republicans estimate that the real cost of the monarchy including security is between £134 and 184 million a year.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:48, archived)
# I suppose it's like any big business
they get grants and tax breaks. It's not like they can go and be royal anywhere else though, is it? Not like the good old days.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:56, archived)
# I just find it odd people complain about us paying for the Monarchy.
The Crown Estate covers that and does a hell of a lot more paying for us.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:00, archived)
# I'm not complaining about the cost (as long as it can be proved they aren't a drain)
I assume tourism alone makes them worthwhile.
I just have a problem about them being where/who they are because they were "chosen by god"
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:03, archived)
# For 'chosen by God'
read 'ancestors best at swords'.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:19, archived)
# ^ This
But not quite right. "Ancestors being in the right place when other people were being really good with swords" is probably more accurate.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:40, archived)
# That
sounds about right.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:52, archived)
# ^this
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:03, archived)
# Although I take your point,
rather them than me. Whatever money they get, you would have to give me more to live their lifestyle. Imagine beng told what, where and when you eat, sleep, live, travel, drive, say, date, marry and believe from the day you are born to the day you die. And no posting drfivel on B3ta either.
They can keep the money.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:23, archived)
# My thoughts exactly, what price freedom.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:19, archived)
# you just need to go a bit mental and they let you do whatever the fuck you want
see prince andrew, edward, etc etc etc
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:35, archived)
# This is why I'm posting here...
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:40, archived)
# The fact that they are apolitical makes them much more endearing to other nations
I think tourism is the tip of the iceberg in terms of benefit. It's the fact that -- from other nations' perspective, not from our cynical selves -- they impart our failing little country a perceived air of decency and status which we don't deserve.

We can all see that we don't make anything any more, our streets are full of chundering hags and fighting charvers of a Saturday night -- yet if you walk into a Chinese business (as I have done), you will be immediately taken for a decent gentleman if you are British. You get an advantage. I believe that "branding" (horrid word) is due to many subtle factors, and the Royal Family is almost certainly one of them.

When the royal marriage happened last year, newsstands across the globe, from Japan to Alaska, were emblazoned with simple, innocent images of love, tradition and decency (which people do latch on to), from a couple who were not fighting for re-election of hiding an agenda. You just can't put a price on the power of that positive message! My friend Kirby, a Filipino programmer living in Malaysia, says his wife's village held a party and got a big TV out to watch the event, and adorned it with British flags. My colleagues in Singapore -- a city state developing 100 times faster than ours -- all expressed an envy of all things British. Do you think they would they have done that for the wedding of a German statesman or even the US president? I personally doubt it.

I used to be very cynical about the Royal Family, but the more I travel, the more I see how it affects the way the way the world interacts with and regards our failing nation. I believe they bring us value and status it's simply not possible to measure.

If they were't there, we'd have an elected nobody who'd change every four years after politicking his way around the world -- who no-one would give a shite about -- and we would gradually begin a descent until we found our true place in the world's pecking order -- right down at the arse end of it.
(, Wed 30 May 2012, 0:26, archived)
# Yeah, they get 15%, the rest goes to the government.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:59, archived)
# curmudgeon is a great word that i dont think ive ever said in a conversation
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:19, archived)
# I hear it a lot :(
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:21, archived)
# Lies!
That's blatantly a gentile belly
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:37, archived)
# Is that today?
Hah, I didn't even know.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:37, archived)
# I think its next week
monday or tuesday
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:42, archived)
# Oh right.
I can see it being like the royal wedding, only less people care about it.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:45, archived)
# i dunno about that - DAY OFF TIEM
I LOVE THE LEADER! *vacant stare*
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:14, archived)
# ALL HAIL OUR BENEFACTORS! SKREEEE! SKREEEE!
(I'll be off anyway. If anything, it's a hindrance, I imagine a lot of shops will be shut.)
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:19, archived)
# I might do what everyone else does and go sit in a park. Victoria park or St James' park
Its nice to do that once in a while when the weather is sunny.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:20, archived)
# I was sat in Piccadilly Garden the other day.
I always find it weird to see people wearing next to nothing walking about a city like Manchester, even when the weather's as nice as this.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:22, archived)
# i suppose its better than if you shat in piccadilly garden the other day
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:52, archived)
# still would.............haunted or not!!!
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 15:50, archived)
# Phil thinks "can't do her from behind with that arse"
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:05, archived)
# HOORAY! THE QUEEN HASN'T DIED YET!
Let's have a party....
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:05, archived)
# Why is she carrying a rabbit with a bag on it's head?
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:07, archived)
# you're going to have to draw that, I'm not seeing it
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:11, archived)
# left hand... 2 paws sticking out from under the bag
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:13, archived)
# HAHAHAHAHA
I was staring at the gold bucket :D
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:13, archived)
# I see it too
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:22, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:21, archived)
# But....how does she smell?
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:11, archived)
# Its a good job god doesnt exist then!
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:13, archived)
# Yay! Go Liz!
I've met her, she's a nice lady.
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 16:45, archived)
# :D
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 17:14, archived)
# BUMHOLE MOUTH!
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 18:18, archived)
#
my one's
(, Mon 28 May 2012, 19:06, archived)
# she won't be celebrating

sucks really.
(, Tue 29 May 2012, 0:28, archived)
# Hahahah

If I could give you the internet to wear as a hat I would sir Mr. Toast :)

(, Tue 29 May 2012, 1:00, archived)
# Nice pair of puppies there Maam!

(, Wed 30 May 2012, 11:16, archived)