b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 1720170

# ...
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:06, archived)
# ahaha
woo!
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:07, archived)
# hehehehehehehehehe
s'got a new job as a blubber gram
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:07, archived)
# urgh
creepy looking man.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:07, archived)
# and a filthy rapist as well.
modedit:
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:09, archived)
# come on
there's no evidence. he might not be filthy
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# he might be a tad dirty though
he may be , not a lot
/paul daniels
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# hmmmmm
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# An innocent man
defamed by lying scum.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# exactly: But not by her:
Slapper
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:13, archived)
# I felt so sorry for her
I still think she did the only thing possible.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:14, archived)
# I'm lost
comepletely on this one, what did she do? and what does it have to do with the mess up that John lesslie has become?

you see I avoid the news whilst its in the news and I ask later when its all died down. This way I can perform an objective opinion.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:16, archived)
# A man had sex with a woman.
She says she didn't want to but he says she did. Another man decided that she did, so the first man was right.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:17, archived)
# ergh!
all to much, I love the quiet life me.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:19, archived)
# she was sexually assaulted when she was a young presenter
and she never told anyone. Then she wrote her autobiography, called it "HONEST" and reasonably enough included the incident, without at any point saying who it was who attacked her - as many years later as it was, there would have been no possibility of making a case stick against them under our legal system.

However, the press got speculating and Matthew Wright let slip on telly that most people thought it was John Leslie. An unknown woman then went to the police claiming JL had attacked her, too. Recently this woman withdrew her evidence after it was revealed that she'd gone to the papers before the police, so JL is now cleared of any attacks.

At no point did Ulrika comment on whether it was JL who attacked her.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:20, archived)
# stupid
cow. She should at least say it wasnt him. Then lie low.

I was put in an aquard situation at 13 yrs old but I would name and shame him if nessasary. But I did cause him to have a hernia at a later date....
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:27, archived)
# thing is
she can't say it was him because there's no way it would stand up in court, so it's technically libel. but if she says it wasn't him...

well, the book's called "honest" let's put it that way.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:37, archived)
# she may well have told the police
whether it was/wasn't him as part of their investigations. There's no reason why she should tell the press too, as it would just lead to more 'who is it then?' reports, which were rather distasteful in the first place.

(edit: and he was being investigated for the other claims who came forward, so she couldn't have stopped it anyway)
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:49, archived)
# And that would be....
....have no talent and only be famous for being 'Ulrika' whilst all the time making notes and then writing a book about an otherwise boring life - spicing it up by (maybe) naming people - and whoring herself to the kind of people who think that 'Hello' and 'OK' are journalism?
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:17, archived)
# Fair play to her.
If people are stupid enough to pay for that shit, then good for her.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:18, archived)
# hear hear
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:17, archived)
# Not exactly accused by her ...
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:15, archived)
# I'm prepared to believe
she may have her reasons for that.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:23, archived)
# if it was him them she's not saying because any case in court would be her word against his
and you'd never get any sort of conviction with the media circus it has been. if it wasn't she's either being extremely devious and cruel, or she'd have to say who it was, or she's making it up.

whatever happened he'd end up suing the pants off here and winning. i can't comment on the ethics of the situation.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:26, archived)
# I see that there is more than one valid interpretation
so I shall shut up about the whole sordid affair, and think of kittens instead.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:38, archived)
# careful
that's libellous
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:11, archived)
# now now
he was cleared. That's why I just said he was creepy looking.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:13, archived)
# i do believe the case with pootle's friend
and a friend of a workmate of mine never went to court, though...
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:18, archived)
# innocent but dead creepy
wonder who will be brave enough to hire him...most people I know wouldn't work on the same set
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:09, archived)
# I heard he's gonna present Sex Tips For Girls
/lie
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# he'll probably end up on a 'men and motors'
show being a 'lad'

(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:13, archived)
# Out of curiosity
have you got either of my recent emails? And if so, are you just not replying in order to appear fashionably busy, or is there a darker, more sinister reason?
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:14, archived)
# I read b3ta mail once a week ...
... and it takes me a about 6 hours to do it. Sorry about that. It's the only was I can deal with it.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:16, archived)
# Ah, fairy nuff.
In that case, you might want to read this:

b3ta.com/board/1719882

I believe that the organisers are waiting for a reply from you.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:18, archived)
# *puts hand up for team
:o)
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:21, archived)
# If we are sending a team
then I think it'll either be the very cream of the crop, or quite simply the very worst we can find in order to stick two fingers up at them. We shall see.

If rob's still reading this, that is.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:22, archived)
# how about 2 teams
b3ta alpha and b3ta b3ta
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:24, archived)
# *puts hand down for team
;oP
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:25, archived)
# can someone email johnny2 and ask him to be our sole representative?
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:26, archived)
# *shoots manic*
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:25, archived)
# Yay!
I got picked first!

wait a minute...
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:26, archived)
# it doesn't really interest me
but if people want to get a team together then go for it.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:22, archived)
# It's probably best, then,
if we just let it die.

You can safely ignore my second of the two emails.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:23, archived)
# Hahahahah
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:14, archived)
# aha
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# Arf
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:10, archived)
# I hope you never
have your life and career destroyed by despicable, anonymous false accusations of filthy crimes.

And if you do, I hope you don't cry.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:12, archived)
# pah
he loved it
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:15, archived)
# You know that for a fact,
do you?
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:17, archived)
# Yep.
I read it on the internet.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:18, archived)
# who are you,
his mum or something?

blimey can't even have cheap pop at cry baby leslie.




(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 11:24, archived)
# not to be rude...
but i'm pretty sure that idea was "borrowed" from maddox:
maddox.xmission.com/hatemail.cgi?p=1 (scroll down)
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 19:46, archived)
# i steal all my pics
from there.
(, Mon 4 Aug 2003, 22:44, archived)