b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Opposite Films » Message 9957300

[challenge entry] When...


From the Opposite Films challenge. See all 687 entries (closed)

(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:11, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:13, archived)
# poor harry
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:14, archived)
# Hahahahahahaha
Can someone tell me whether I want to spend £100ish of my bonus on a 50mm portrait/f1.8 or a 75-300mm zoom/f4-5.6 lens, please?

(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:16, archived)
# The fact you've said it means you probably want to...
...as for should, no idea.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:18, archived)
# No - I'm going to buy one.
I just don't know which to go for.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:19, archived)
# I read 50mm and thought you where going up the clock tower..

they'll learn..all of them!!
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:18, archived)
# They all learn in the end.
In the end, they all learn.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:20, archived)
# no you want to buy me a pony
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:18, archived)
# *summons Joe Scaramanga's Del Boy post*
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:19, archived)
# lens
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:20, archived)
# No...
all your bonus is for beer prefarably when you're with me
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:21, archived)
# ^ votes for this
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:21, archived)
# *Improves*
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:25, archived)
# can't have been that bad a hangover then
if you're already thinking about drinking again
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:25, archived)
# It's the only cure.
*hic*
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:27, archived)
# It's fucking awful
I've only eaten half my twix
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:32, archived)
# Single or double?
IT'S IMPORTANT!
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:38, archived)
# double!
singles are for girls...
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:59, archived)
# The 50mm
Without a shadow of a doubt. I've got one and it is absolutely bloody marvelous.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:23, archived)
# Ah - now. That's the sort of response I was after.
Have you tried long shots with the 50mm? If so, how have they turned out?
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:26, archived)
# To be honest I haven't tried that
I've been mainly using the impressive depth of field on targets within a couple of metres. Those have come out brilliantly. I'm not really sure why you'd use it on long shots either - it is much more of a portrait lens.

Which 75-300 are you looking at, because I've got the Mk1 75-300 IS and I'm planning to get rid of it because it can't properly focus at 300mm and the image stabiliser is broken.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:35, archived)
# I find amazon reviews very helpful for these
www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B00005K47Y/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

As per mine they seem to be saying it is soft at full extension, but there seems to be no way round that without paying four figure sums, and frankly you'll probably be fine as long as you don't blow the images up too large.

Assuming you've only got the kit 35-70 lens then get the zoom. You'll probably find more uses for it than the 50mm - I got that as my third lens.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 14:04, archived)
# No...
All your bonus are belong to us!
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:24, archived)
# Sell it all, sell your car, sell your family
buy a Leica M9 and a 35/2 aspherical.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:40, archived)
# I'd go with the 50mm

as I'm almost certain a £100ish 75-300mm will be shit, while a £100ish 50mm lens is some very good stuff indeed.
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:49, archived)
# Also, if you are interested in that sort of thing, I'd seriously consider getting the 70-300mm USM IS lens instead

but get the 50mm first
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:51, archived)
# aaw :(
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:16, archived)
# hahahha, that works far too well :D
*clicky*
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:20, archived)
# hahahaha
so simple but hilarious
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:21, archived)
# Pfft!
Nicely done!



I want that sandwich....
(, Fri 12 Mar 2010, 13:25, archived)