Boo :(
I've discussed about whether Lagrangians are covariant or not, the physicality of a non-covariant Lagrangian (of course it has one; if it didn't the whole of effective field theory would be pretty suspect), and something of the inner workings of acoustic black holes. I thought that was pretty highbrow.
Then again, you probably didn't see it.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:15,
archived)
Then again, you probably didn't see it.
I can't say it's stuck in my mind
so you're probably right. I didn't see it.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:20,
archived)
I was involved in a two-person economics pun thread once.
I think I win.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:29,
archived)
That is pretty superior. Chemistry discussions would probably be pretty boring.
Although there was a documentary on last night about chemistry where I learned about the first guy to draw a chemical bond as a line on a page (he was Scottish!).
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:32,
archived)
Mine wasn't a chemistry discussion!
:( Mine was about quantum physics and field theories and condensed matter and, specifically, acoustic black holes which are exactly what they say, black holes for sound.
I'm going to go and sulk* now.
* Sleep, I get up in six hours to go to an airport. I love** flying.
** Fucking loathe
Edit: Also I actually agree, chemistry discussions *would* be pretty dull. Then again, so would theoretical physics ones, I guess, so I'm actually no better than you. I really am going to bed now.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:51,
archived)
I'm going to go and sulk* now.
* Sleep, I get up in six hours to go to an airport. I love** flying.
** Fucking loathe
Edit: Also I actually agree, chemistry discussions *would* be pretty dull. Then again, so would theoretical physics ones, I guess, so I'm actually no better than you. I really am going to bed now.