Well it's a damn site more interesting than the original 'modern art installation'...
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:06, archived)
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:06, archived)
See an analyst
I can see you're projecting.
/adapted from joke from Voyager
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:10,
archived)
/adapted from joke from Voyager
originally reminded me of the exhibition that they went to in an episode of spaced/
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:10,
archived)
that piece was actually a great work of its time which played off historical art traditions but in a modern (at the time) minimalist discourse
sorry, it's only because I'm an art student. nice work.
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:11,
archived)
i've got three of themin my garage if you would like to purchase them
£250 each.
purchased from book outlet stoore for £3.99 each
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:21,
archived)
I feel obliged to defend this, but at the same time, I just get the same feeling that it'd just be a bit sad
I think I'll plump for the latter
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:25,
archived)
It's really indefensible. Any art whose value lies only in its explanation, not its execution is good marketing, not good art. :)
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:31,
archived)
this is how most modern are justifiys itself
by coming up with some convaluted 86 page theses on the artists innner being.
and when people say, but it's a fucking tent/shed/bed/lump of horse turd that they could have done the reply comes 'yes, but you didn't'
to wit the reply is because it wasn't worth the effort as it's a piece of horse shit with little or no worth above it's original retail value.
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:32,
archived)
and when people say, but it's a fucking tent/shed/bed/lump of horse turd that they could have done the reply comes 'yes, but you didn't'
to wit the reply is because it wasn't worth the effort as it's a piece of horse shit with little or no worth above it's original retail value.
while trying to keep this civil, and not going off on one...
I'd agree with that to an extent - there is a lot of art that requires the explanation which isn't at all evident in the work - but as with most "high culture"
- for want of a much better term like literature, or theatre, or film etc. - art which is really worth while lies within a discourse which may be exclusive to the artist, or
to a collective, or movement etc which needs a level of understanding to appreciate the themes, motives etc. And, contextually - in the
history of art - some things seem strange now, - like 3 blank canvases - but made perfect sense at the time, like when you see really shit, over the top acting
in old films; it wasn't considered shit, or over the top at the time, it made perfect contextual sense at the time. We're just looking at it from a completely different viewpoint.
Anyway, that's my piece, :)
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 1:08,
archived)
- for want of a much better term like literature, or theatre, or film etc. - art which is really worth while lies within a discourse which may be exclusive to the artist, or
to a collective, or movement etc which needs a level of understanding to appreciate the themes, motives etc. And, contextually - in the
history of art - some things seem strange now, - like 3 blank canvases - but made perfect sense at the time, like when you see really shit, over the top acting
in old films; it wasn't considered shit, or over the top at the time, it made perfect contextual sense at the time. We're just looking at it from a completely different viewpoint.
Anyway, that's my piece, :)
no thanks
i've got half-painted canvases in my cupboards already
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:26,
archived)
what do you mean
you can't beat a warm pint of old monkeys throat wangling titanic.
*informs CAMRA about you*
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:37,
archived)
*informs CAMRA about you*
you days are fucking numbered
you'll be swinging from my sandals.
( ,
Sat 20 Mar 2010, 0:41,
archived)