well, for one it would remove the profit motive that results in chronic underfunding
(
rofl harris, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 17:00,
Share,
Reply)
Yes, because underfunding isn't an issue anywhere in state-funded services
No siree. Not at all.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 17:27,
Share,
Reply)
Yes because before privatisation the trains in this country were wonderful.
Are you a child or has a brain injury impaired your memory?
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 17:31,
Share,
Reply)
No, I think I said it would remove the profit motive
For example, much of rail subsidies go directly to shareholders, rather than being re-invested to improve the network.
Prufuck - sure you've not mistaken this place for Brietbart? Both start with a 'b', which I guess might be confusing you.
(
rofl harris, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:03,
Share,
Reply)
Ha ha
I keep an eye on Breitbart, but it's a bit much, even for my taste. For real laughs I go to The Canary. You'd love that site. Real loony bins stuff.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:49,
Share,
Reply)
ahem, that would be state-owned railtrack you're looking for...
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 18:57,
Share,
Reply)
Don't spoil his fantasy with facts.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 23 Aug 2016, 19:02,
Share,
Reply)
