I hear her marriage has gone off the rails.
But while it lasted it was a steamy affair. She always felt very hornby.
Drove her loco.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 11:56, Share, Reply)
But while it lasted it was a steamy affair. She always felt very hornby.
Drove her loco.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 11:56, Share, Reply)
That bra-less sweatsuit look
really shows off her gargantuan, pendulous udders. You go gurl.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:03, Share, Reply)
really shows off her gargantuan, pendulous udders. You go gurl.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:03, Share, Reply)
What is it with the mentally ill and lack of bosom support?
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:05, Share, Reply)
I could answer this,
but I don't want to get banned from /links.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:07, Share, Reply)
but I don't want to get banned from /links.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:07, Share, Reply)
If it involves you showing us pictures of your gargantuam, pendulous udders
then I think it is worth the risk.
I am tumescent with anticipation.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:21, Share, Reply)
then I think it is worth the risk.
I am tumescent with anticipation.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:21, Share, Reply)
Well, I doubt she's had any better offers.
P.S. It's "railway station", not "train station".
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:08, Share, Reply)
P.S. It's "railway station", not "train station".
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:08, Share, Reply)
From that very page
"In British English, traditional usage favours railway station or simply station, even though train station, which is an Americanism, is now misused instead of railway station in writing."
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:19, Share, Reply)
"In British English, traditional usage favours railway station or simply station, even though train station, which is an Americanism, is now misused instead of railway station in writing."
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:19, Share, Reply)
That's clearly not correct though.
I take no issue with the first part of that sentence.
But misused? Is there a more correct usage for "train station" than meaning "station for trains" such that using it as "station for trains" counts as misuse?
That's clearly just someone's opinion, and not an objective fact. So I have corrected it.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:50, Share, Reply)
I take no issue with the first part of that sentence.
But misused? Is there a more correct usage for "train station" than meaning "station for trains" such that using it as "station for trains" counts as misuse?
That's clearly just someone's opinion, and not an objective fact. So I have corrected it.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:50, Share, Reply)
I don't really care either way
I was just amused that the page you produced as proof seemed to directly contradict you.
Edit: and now you've edited that page so that it doesn't? That's genius. I'd take my hat off to you were I the sort of cunt who wore one.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:55, Share, Reply)
I was just amused that the page you produced as proof seemed to directly contradict you.
Edit: and now you've edited that page so that it doesn't? That's genius. I'd take my hat off to you were I the sort of cunt who wore one.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:55, Share, Reply)
Lol, yeah I suppose it was a bit of a cheap trick,
but I wouldn't edit a page to be actually wrong only to prove a point. I figured I should do it here since the original sentence basically didn't make sense.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 14:04, Share, Reply)
but I wouldn't edit a page to be actually wrong only to prove a point. I figured I should do it here since the original sentence basically didn't make sense.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 14:04, Share, Reply)
Words get old and replaced. That's why games like Call My Bluff exist.
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:18, Share, Reply)
( , Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:18, Share, Reply)