b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1559842 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I would very much like to see the following people live on a council estate for a month on benfits.
- Every MP. They're there to represent the people, but they are so far removed from them, so far removed from knowing what its like to struggle, that they think it's OK to buy a fucking duck pond on expenses.
- Every policy maker and upper-management for DWP.

The only trouble with that, I don't know of a single individual who hasn't had to wait at _least_ 2 months for their benifits to come through.
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:39, 3 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
It was the one that had his moat cleaned on expenses that really made me laugh.

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:41, Reply)
How else does one get it cleaned?

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:43, Reply)
"Are you seriously proposing that pay to get my own moat cleaned?
"My dear sir, what on Earth are the peasantry *for*?"
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:45, Reply)
my dad uses the welsh to do ours
they're near enough the cheshire border and grateful for the cash
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:48, Reply)

cash sheep
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:48, Reply)

c w
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:54, Reply)
haha
i am laughing a lot.
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:03, Reply)
I don't get what goes through someone's head to think "That is an OK purhcase".
How can someone draw the conclusion that it is anything but a sackable offence?
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:46, Reply)
It won't
It will have been his PA/assistant/butler
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:49, Reply)
It wasn't a sackable offence
Apart from one or two exceptions (those who have been or are being prosecuted), on the whole it was the system that was corrupt not the MPs. They were encouraged to claim for as much as they could.
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:50, Reply)
^ this ^
yes, they SHOULD have thought, i am being a disgusting piss-taker, but they didn't because everyone else was doing it. and we all know that makes it ok.
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:51, Reply)
I'd do it just for the lols

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:57, Reply)
I think anyone who has to say "What I did wasn't wrong, according to law BLAH BLAH I was perfectly entitled too.." must know they're taking the piss.

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:01, Reply)
gonz your username is making me hungry, dammit

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:03, Reply)
Ma' made some salt beef and potato ludkas, I got proper jew-food for lunch today. OH BOY.

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:07, Reply)
now you've made me want a bagel
damn you gonz damn you and all your kind
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:18, Reply)
I bet they wouldn't waste it on booze, fags and sky tv

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:45, Reply)
Booze and tv isn't a waste, silly

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:46, Reply)
It is when you can't afford decent food for your children

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:54, Reply)
I bet one of them says "What's the point? I know it's only for a month, it's not a fair test, I might as well not do it".

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:47, Reply)
Our local socialist only drew the wage of a skilled factory worker when he was an MP
(about 40% of what other MPs were being paid)
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:46, Reply)
what an idiot

(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 10:51, Reply)
I remember him - Dave Nellist
Good honest bloke with principles. Paid his staff the proper going rate too instead of using unpaid interns and overpaid relatives. Obviously this didn't go down well with the Labour party so they dumped him and installed a new guy (I knew the new guy when he was a union official at RR - didn't trust him then, even less reason to trust him now)
(, Thu 15 Mar 2012, 11:15, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1