Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(
rob, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Oh so now you are trying to wash your hands of your earlier accusations.(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 14:53, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
No, I stand by themAnd you're about as likely to get an apology out of me as the nation is to eke a decent joke out of James Corden
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 14:59, Reply)
You're wrong, and I'm looking forward to rubbing it in your big gay face.(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:04, Reply)
Of course I bloody haveYou've made it very apparent that you can't be trusted with access to photos which I consider to be for friends' eyes only
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:06, Reply)
You do realise that you haven't restricted access to your photos.Now, if I was a real prick I would a) not have told you that and b) have been posting a lot more pictures of you right now. But I'm not, so you can have that bit of advice for nothing.
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:12, Reply)
Your previous in this respect is not goodYesterday you posted a pic which I had already asked you once not to share. In an earlier thread you claimed that by posting pics of myself on b3ta I'd let myself in for whatever abuse you chose to dole out, until Kroney pointed out the difference between posting on here and posting on FB. You wouldn't post loads of pics of my from my FB cos you'd get stepped for doing so without my permission. And I'll be barring you from my FB as soon as I get home, can't do it on my phone.
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:17, Reply)
No, I said that by posting pictures of yourself on b3ta you couldn't really object to someone posting a picture of your face.Something which I never actually did, I posted a picture of your hair, since I realise that people don't really like having other people posting pictures of their faces on b3ta. Hence why I don't do it.
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:19, Reply)
That is the flimsiest argument I've ever heardYou're only making yourself look more of a twat by arguing a case which is already lost
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:22, Reply)
Do you really have so much trouble understanding why somebody might have a problemwith you posting pictures of them on a website with the express intention of setting him up to be mocked?
I know this is nothing to do with me, but I'm really struggling to understand your position, here.
(
Kroney, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:18,
Reply)
I actually took the photo down once he pointed out that he had already asked me to do so once.I had actually forgotten about his previous request, and so I apologised.
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:24, Reply)
Which I appreciatedBut you can hardly stand by your earlier argument in light of this behaviour
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:28, Reply)
Of course I can.If you voluntarily put up a load of photos of who you are and what you like doing on this website and somebody links to them then it's entirely your own fault. However, as I've already said, I wouldn't want someone to do that to me, so I don't do it to other people. What I have done is put up heavily altered photos so that anyone who saw them wouldn't be able to identify them. The photos are posted as a joke and if someone was to post a similar photo of me with my eyes made massive and googly and a big cock covering my face then I would probably find it quite funny.
For example:
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:35, Reply)
Is it bollocks!(
Davros' Granddad a voice of calm reason in a world of spastics., Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:57,
Reply)
No it's a photo of Al. I think he's done that to make a point. What that point is I don't know. (
Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 16:03,
Reply)
Right, rightSo if, when calling me a stupid haired bumsexualist, you posted a "heavily altered" pic of me which was only accessible to my FB friends, NOT every user of this website, clearly indicating that it was me albeit with LOLarious paint pics over my face, even though you'd done so before and I'd asked you once to take it down... that would be just fine?
I realise that certain people - "cunts", I think they're known as - can't admit when they're wrong, but you'd do much better to cut your losses and bow out at this point. I'm sure your standing on b3ta could slip another notch or two if you REALLY try, but SpankyHanky will be annoyed if you take away his "most reviled" trophy
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:40, Reply)
Well, in answer to your first pointand at the risk of repeating myself, I took the picture down as soon as you asked, because I had genuinely forgotten that you'd already asked me to do that, and I apologised. So, that to me looks very much like me admitting that the picture yesterday was wrong on my part.
And that last part addresses the second part of your post.
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:44, Reply)
Can you at least accept why I've defriended you on FB? And that it's entirely your fault?The worst part is that you're perfectly capable of being a really nice guy, but when the opportunity to appear cool and popular on a fucking internet forum presents itself you become a dickhead
(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:47, Reply)
Of course I know why you defriended me on facebook. You've taken the interent very seriously and got upset.(, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:48, Reply)
You should have got it to display numbers of votes rather than just percentages. (, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:49, Reply)
thing isit's someone who can spell and who has a fairly decent grasp on grammar
which knocks out quite a few of the obvious suspects
(
rachelswipe with a fork, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:04,
Reply)
well yeahbut come on, that isn't going to narrow it down around here!
(
rachelswipe with a fork, Fri 30 Mar 2012, 15:08,
Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread