That is the biggest most spastic lump of utter fucking shite since Racelswipe last wrote on this board.

(Bazongaloid, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:18, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

Yeah, those scientists, eh? What do they know?

( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:20, Reply)

I must agree with Mr Badger here.
What a stupid way to eat.
(Bear Pookie The Frankly Challenged. Halloween is coming to town., Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:21, Reply)

What's wrong with smaller portions and no snacks?
And, you know...a bit of exercise? Even a brisk 30 minute stroll every day will make a difference over time.
( Two Hats I saw someone eating M&M's with a spoon, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:22, Reply)

Exercise? Smaller portions, and cut down on snacking?
My God, you'll be advocating limiting the Doners and Curly Wurlies next.
(Bear Pookie The Frankly Challenged. Halloween is coming to town., Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:23, Reply)

Look, I'm not saying it's not radical
But it's worth a try, right?
( Two Hats I saw someone eating M&M's with a spoon, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:24, Reply)

Well, in the case of what you're trying, absolutely fuck all since they've not done any trials whatsoever
the 5:2 idea is entirely based on conjecture with no evidence to support it.
(Bazongaloid, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:22, Reply)

Also, that is almost to the letter a perfect example of a "science" article that contains no fucking science at all
Where is the evidence of peer reviewed published articles? There is only one "scientist" mentioned and no details of how they are qualified, the article starts by talking about fasting then immediately jumps to talking about growth hormone.

Seriously, it couldn't be more wishy washy if it was written by Gillian McKeith in a fucking laundry.
(Bazongaloid, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:24, Reply)

Whenever The Sun publishes "scientific" stuff,
it's always "boffins" who come up with the facts. This sounds on a par with that nonsense.
(Bear Pookie The Frankly Challenged. Halloween is coming to town., Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:27, Reply)

Hi Doctor Nick!
Y'know, from that programme.
( Two Hats I saw someone eating M&M's with a spoon, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:29, Reply)

it's not exactly clear cut,
there are some hilarious inconsistencies between studies that should be quite similar. Many of the early studies of mice and primates frequently used to justify this compared calorie restricted animals to animals free to eat as much feed as possible rather than a set higher number of calories, and those feeds were garbage as they assumed calories ar calories whatever is in there.

I wouldn't base my life around something on the bbc website, considering how many other science articles on there are just nonsense
( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:29, Reply)

Meh
I can certainly benefit from being more aware of what I eat. I'm giving it a go, I shall see what it does for me.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:37, Reply)

I guess you could do it as LARP diet and go to asda once a week wearing only a dirty loin cloth and a spear

( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:43, Reply)

Asda? You pleb
I do my hunter-gathering in Sainsburys.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:49, Reply)

waitrose right here
fuck you
(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:54, Reply)

£81 on a week's food shopping this weekend
i live alone.

fuck you.
(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:55, Reply)

I walk to and from work
so usually pop in for about £15 worth two or three times a week on the way home. Never got the hang of the "weekly shop".

I know someone who does a big cook on a Sunday and a Wednesday their meals for the entire week as that way they can e.g. cook a load of mince and then make chili and bolognese and curry without having a pack of greying meat sitting in the fridge. Way too organised for me though.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Mon 3 Sep 2012, 11:58, Reply)