b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2324803 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

actually, it very much can be bad in spite of being enjoyed by millions
I've never really understood the 'argument' you just put forward.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:00, 1 reply, 10 years ago)
first, you are the self-appointed arbiter of "bad"
and looking at your taste, well, you should sack yourself immediately.

secondly, what is the point of writing? if it is to be read, and to entertain, and to make money, which it is for nearly everyone who writes, then they win.

next?
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:01, Reply)
the point of writing is not to make money.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:02, Reply)
yer
it's to starve in an attic all noble-like.

as if.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
getting paid to do it is nice, granted
But there is no correlation between the quality of the writing and its financial success.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
as judged by whom?
who is assessing this "quality"?
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:06, Reply)
well, you could start with what is studied in academic institutions as a broad rule of thumb

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:08, Reply)
i don't consider where you got your degree to be "academic"
so that stuffs you for starters
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:30, Reply)
I mean all academic institutions across the UK.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:52, Reply)
Like Harry Potter

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:10, Reply)
No I dont

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:14, Reply)
I did however like the irony of the book credited with getting kids reading again
putting a lot of small independent bookshops out of business with supermarkets selling them as a loss leader
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:15, Reply)
neither is it necessarily to entertain

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
yeah, let's ban all writing that is for such a sordid purpose as to entertain, people should never ever enjoy it
let's have only overblown pretentious wank and then we can all be like the emperor's new clothes and pretend to love it on a messageboard.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
I never said to ban it yeah

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:07, Reply)
people write because they want to be read
most people today would rather read stephen king than george eliot
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:22, Reply)
I think you're deliberately overlooking the word 'necessarily'.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:53, Reply)
Alright 'Gary Cranley' nice to see pomposity levels are at an all time high!!!

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
haha! the most preening pretentious pillock on here, yet he always accuses certain other posters of pretension!
And he forgot to log out before posting about his favourite meal!
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:10, Reply)
UH-OH!!!

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:11, Reply)

orwell.ru/library/essays/wiw/english/e_wiw
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:04, Reply)
it's not mass market shit, therefore it's pretentious wank
tl;dr
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:06, Reply)
Pulp fiction is like pulp telly
it can be enjoyable without being of "artistic merit"
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:14, Reply)
never said it isn't

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:17, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1