b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Unreasonable Cruelty » Post 2020581 | Search
This is a question Unreasonable Cruelty

Freddie Woo tells us: "We used to lock kids in the toilets at school just because we could." But why would you do such a thing? Why would you give teaching such a bad name? Tell us about times when events have taken a turn for the harsh.

Suggested by Munsta

(, Thu 18 Jul 2013, 16:06)
Pages: Popular, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back

Is all cruelty not unreasonable?
Is just kicking that swan to death less cruel than kicking the swan to death whilst wearing Doctor Martens and being egged on by your mates who are pelting it with stones and then you break the fucks neck with your bare hands and laugh at the poor parentless cygnets.

Badger baiting is what is needed in todays society, youth would not be so bothered with their underwear if there was more badger baiting.

reasoned cruelty, I thought a man I saw on the street had killed my brother so I threw acid in his face. I did not have a brother so I suppose the acid to the face was a bit cruel. Some folk cannot take a fucking joke.
(, Thu 18 Jul 2013, 18:39, 8 replies)
Cruelty is necessary for success.
Let the plebs and wishy washy libruls flail around in the shallow end with their empathy and kindness. Nature sneers at the weak.
(, Thu 18 Jul 2013, 18:52, closed)
Is empathy a kindness?
The personality disorder of lacking empathy is theoretically the reason that our race became what it is today and now the true cruel, uncaring Alpha male sociopath is harangued by society for all them murders that they done.

Or economies that they have collapsed.
(, Thu 18 Jul 2013, 20:59, closed)
I'm not sure I'd murder one of the plebs.
Society has built a reasonable system to protect them so the risk isn't worth it. But equally it's not my fault that I'm cleverer than almost everybody so there's no way I'm going out of my way to keep the mediocre pricks happy.
(, Thu 18 Jul 2013, 23:26, closed)
Cleverer - such an ugly unitellectual word.
Unless you are a true polymath, my definition is having been published in multiple philosophical disciplines for example Wittgenstein or Russell and not a Renaissance Man type who flings a bit of paint around and can carry a tune on the ole piano whilst speaking a couple of languages. Then you are not cleverer, you are merely above average intelligence.

Not a personal attack but an observation.
(, Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:15, closed)
I assume you dropped the comma and the 'n' to make a subtly ironic point there.

(, Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:55, closed)
I make no claim to be cleverer. But yes, the spelling mistake is bollocks.

(, Fri 19 Jul 2013, 11:39, closed)
Not so much pube straightening
as "Uh?"
(, Fri 19 Jul 2013, 0:45, closed)
Relatives
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ0kP1yfL68
(, Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:18, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Popular, 4, 3, 2, 1