b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The Secret Lives of Animals » Message 7582120

[challenge entry] no one looking? right!

thanks/apologies to JJ for the use of one of his pics ;)

From the The Secret Lives of Animals challenge. See all 354 entries (closed)

(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:08, archived)
# To be fair, squirrels should fancy squirrels.
It's only humans that shouldn't.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# To be fair,
he draws them with tits
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# That argument won't stand up in court
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:10, archived)
# It will if a select few b3tans are on the jury.
...I just got images of b3tans on the jury for Harold Shipman, and letting him go because 'he was a right laugh'
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# So as long as the 12 year old has buds growing . . . ?
They are fucking animals - he's a pervert.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# I take it
you don't like furries, then?
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:12, archived)
# Ah, come on
He's a decent guy and can draw better than most of us. It's not like he's forcing you to wank off to furry stuff
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:13, archived)
# No, I ignore him so I don't see it.
Wanting to copulate with animals and (by definition) minors (few squirrels live beyond 3 years old ffs) makes him a pervert.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:16, archived)
# By our standard, that's minors,
but squirrels reach adulthood faster ;)
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:17, archived)
# Yes,
I just don't like the idea of looking at squirrels with tits any more than looking at, say, 4 year old girls with tits drawn on them.

Fucking an 8 year old is wrong - imagining them with tits as sexual objects is wrong
Fucking a squirrel is wrong - imagining them with tits is wrong.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:19, archived)
# would squirrels with the shits be more to you liking.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:24, archived)
# Yeah, but that's like, a million in squirrel years
So it's more like wanting to do an pensioner, which is not disgusting at all...
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:18, archived)
# I remember a few weeks ago when we were talking about religion here
you said you think everyone should believe in what he wants, as long as they don't break the law or constrain others with it (or something along those lines).
and now you say someone's a pervert because he is (supposedly!) turned on by things you aren't?
sounds a bit like double standards to me, where do you draw the line? are gay people perverts too?

I can understand that you ingnore him because you don't want to see his pics, but please stop posting "PERVERT!" everytime his name comes up
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:22, archived)
# That's fair. I did start with a reasonable post, but got sucked in.
I just think that a desire to look at animals sexually and, in particular, producing images portraying it, is likely to lead to animals being abused to produce more obscene images.

Much as cartoons of child abuse would upset me because they will likely bring people in to the idea of child porn and result in a child getting hurt to make that porn.

I think that blatently promoting sexual thoughts towards animals is tantamount to inciting animal cruelty.

My words were likely to have been 'as long as they don't interfere with anyone else' - the law is unlikely to come into it. I think that animals being interfered with is a reason not to do it.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:29, archived)
# fair enough
you should blame Disney, Warner and others too then, they introduced anthropomorphic animals (with partly very clear female proportions) to millions of kids ;)
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:37, archived)
# I don;t think Disney and co are to blame
anthropomorphasising (sp?!) goes back at the very least to Egyptian Gods, but most ancient folk tales have manly beasts and feminine serpents and such
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:48, archived)
# Manley beasts?
Zeus used to be into bestiality in a big way.

I often ask myself 'what would Zeus do?'

It's almost always 'turn into a swan and rape a teenager'.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:00, archived)
# or even into a shower of gold O_o

(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:09, archived)
# yes
but the "Disney is evil" theory is far more exciting

and it's "anthropomorphising" I think :)
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:08, archived)
# Haha
are you disgusted by girls in playboy bunny outfits
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:26, archived)
# They are humans wearring animal costumes - furries don't appal me.
JJ's stuff is animals with tits - I was beginning to feel prudish but I have had a few emails and a gaz which say that lots of people agree with me, I am just more vocal than most, so I'm going to keep saying it - the man has talent, but he posts porn and bestiality porn at that.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:32, archived)
# But the figure and anatomy is wholy human
just with animal ears, tail and the slight suggestion of fur. Bunny girls are the same (minus the fur).

A cartoon of a bunny girl would look almost identical to Kat and the like.

It's not like they have six nipples or anything.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:51, archived)
# this
and the "soul" is human too
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:15, archived)
# A playbunny outfit is an outfit
A rabbit human hybrid is not something (most) people would find sexually appealing.

I agree wholeheartedly that JJ is talented but does *every* pic have to be some cute fluffy animal with humongous boobs?

I don't know JJ at all so I'm not going to say he does x or y or z, I just wish he'd use his talent in other ways from time to time.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:37, archived)
# but that perv is wanking over squirrels that look like fucking HUMANS! blegh!
;)
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# You are right.
I cannot believe I missed it.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# deja vu!
*click*
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# hahahahahaha
you non stop talented bastard!

that's all I can say

*cleek*
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# hahahaha great!

(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# Oooh that's a bit good, that is
I like the pixellated look a lot.
EDIT: what software are you using for your animation?
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:09, archived)
# the pixellation is the result of having to optimize it down so far
I'm using 3DS MAX, Paint Shop Pro and Animation Shop
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:20, archived)
# Hahaha
I think we're the fools seldom differ:p
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:10, archived)
# that is fucking ace
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:10, archived)
# GTFO
You're far too talented to be allowed in here.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:10, archived)
# Aceness!
as per.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:10, archived)
# Hahaha!
I knew that was yours before I scrolled down to the username.

Ace work as usual.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# Hahaha
Great as usual!
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
[challenge entry] You are so 1995 Toasty
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
[challenge entry] Mind if I slip this pea in here?

(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:13, archived)
# This, Sir, is simply fabulous
please tell me he freaks out in a sec on account of all that Redbull, when Counterstrike won't load
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:31, archived)
# First thing I see when I cross over.
It made me smile.


Have a purple heart.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# haha xD
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:11, archived)
# Stop it!
Give us untalented gits a chance! :)

*clicks*

(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:12, archived)
# Jesus Mr. Toast
You're fucking brilliant.

*clicks*
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:13, archived)
# hehehe!
splendid.
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:14, archived)
# Stop being so good. I insist*
*Not really - keep up the good work, young man.

:)

Have a click-eroo
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:17, archived)
# REAL LIFE LOL
I know JJ has his fans but this just made me do a beer spurt. BIG CLICKS and deserves many more
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:18, archived)
# Hahaha
Nice :)
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:18, archived)
# Nice ...
page flutter
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:22, archived)
# Haha
(, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:22, archived)
# I don't think
this can be topped.

W/Y/H/P
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 2:27, archived)