Inspired by news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8327650.stm
I wasn't aware of all the *bloody* restrictions!!!
I wasn't aware of all the *bloody* restrictions!!!
From the Corporate Logos That Tell The Truth challenge. See all 524 entries (closed)
( , Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:49, archived)
Edit: I'm starting a GAY BLOOD BANK!
We will only accept blood that's contaminated!
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:01,
archived)
Even worse in Australia
They won't accept blood from anyone who's lived in the UK. Mad Cow disease, ya know.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:51,
archived)
If I ever need blood, I hope it would be contaminated
with SEXY bits
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:52,
archived)
with SEXY bits
"He's lost 4 pints of blood, GET THIS MAN SOME BLACK PUDDING!"
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:56,
archived)
What about straight guys who have had sex with men, who themselves have had sex with a woman who once shagged a guy who was a practicing gay?
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:54,
archived)
Practicing
1. To do or perform habitually or customarily; make a habit of: practices courtesy in social situations.
Practising
1. A made up word.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:07,
archived)
Practising
1. A made up word.
Online dictionaries aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Practise - verb
Practice - noun
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:09,
archived)
Practice - noun
well I like my American style spelling better
if it's wrong I don't wan't to be right.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:14,
archived)
it's very wrong, especially on b3ta ;)
I bet you do the same thing for licence too don't you :p
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:17,
archived)
Nope that's one word my dyslexic brain recognises in the correct spelling
it looks wrong with the 's'
But now that you are questioning it both spellings look wrong to me.
Bugger, now I have to re-learn how to spell.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:21,
archived)
But now that you are questioning it both spellings look wrong to me.
Bugger, now I have to re-learn how to spell.
haha sorry :)
actually licence/license bugs me a whole lot more than practice/practise, which is still nowhere near as bad as the American pronunciation of harassment.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:28,
archived)
I thought the blood transfusion after 1980 thing was anti-cjd
and that it was because it had to cover the previous 20 years, but the cut-off hasn't changed.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:54,
archived)
They tell you all this when you go to donate
They also tell you that you might develop a bruise. What they don't tell you is that you might have a big red mark for weeks, in a place that makes it look like you're on smack.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:56,
archived)
I get confused by this every time I see it
There has to be a good reason why it's considered necessary but I just can't get my head around how it is justified and not considered discrimination.
I am almost as likely to be a risk as any other sexually active person, even gay, I thought we'd got rid of the 'Aids is a gay disease' nonsense many years ago?!
Edit: Ah, just followed the link, it's raising the same confusion.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:57,
archived)
I am almost as likely to be a risk as any other sexually active person, even gay, I thought we'd got rid of the 'Aids is a gay disease' nonsense many years ago?!
Edit: Ah, just followed the link, it's raising the same confusion.
I know, I used to donate regularly
Never stopped wondering though
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:04,
archived)
I only started recently
It wasn't a very good experience but I'm going again
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:07,
archived)
^This. Hard.
I don't understand why they don't just get all the blood they can, and then test it all, rejecting the bad blood.
They say they test it all for HIV and hepatitis anyway before they use it, so what's the problem?
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:58,
archived)
They say they test it all for HIV and hepatitis anyway before they use it, so what's the problem?
HIV tests aren't very accurate
And it can take months to show anything even though you may be HIV positive.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:02,
archived)
yeah
that's how they got my auntie.
Most of the south west Porn business was put on hold for months!
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:03,
archived)
Most of the south west Porn business was put on hold for months!
You'd think that they could easily just not allow
anyone who has had unprotected sex during the previous x months (however long it takes to have an accurate result) from donating, regardless of sexuality.
I'm sure if they phrased their rules better then they could still block people who are high-risk without appearing homophobic.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:46,
archived)
I'm sure if they phrased their rules better then they could still block people who are high-risk without appearing homophobic.
I'm pretty lazy and should have given blood
didn't realise I wouldn't be allowed to.
However, there are people who have donated so much blood that when they need a transfusion, they get their own blood back. That would mean that all those excluded would not be afforded such a service.
Can I give blood just in case I need it later?
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:03,
archived)
However, there are people who have donated so much blood that when they need a transfusion, they get their own blood back. That would mean that all those excluded would not be afforded such a service.
Can I give blood just in case I need it later?
The swine flu?
Thankfully.
Is it transmittable through seminal fluid?
edit:oh the blood. They have like special gold members card or something. I know people who worked in blood, and were. You never know when a lot of your own blood could come in handy.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:08,
archived)
Is it transmittable through seminal fluid?
edit:oh the blood. They have like special gold members card or something. I know people who worked in blood, and were. You never know when a lot of your own blood could come in handy.
Not true
Plus, unused blood gets frozen or split down into other useable parts
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:10,
archived)
My point, I just seriously didn't realise all the restrictions. Even though they say they screen all blood, their tests aren't 100%, whats to stop someone donating blood (even though they are gay but do not disclose this)? What are the consequences? Do the blood service just rely on honesty of the donor???
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:04,
archived)
It's a crime for one
But yes, it relies on honesty for the most part
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:06,
archived)
I still give blood* even though I technically break one of those restrictions
I simply don't believe it legitimately discounts me and I have very rare blood.
*though I haven't managed to get around to it in a while
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:07,
archived)
*though I haven't managed to get around to it in a while
Kerry told me he'd never tell anyone about our rondezvous,
I feel cheated!
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:10,
archived)
I even saw the photos
You don't have to deal with the tears each evening you don't call though, SHAME on you
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:13,
archived)
The lesbian / gay / bi society got the blood donation service banned from Fresher's week at Birmingham uni because they claimed they were discriminating against homosexuals.
This is pretty selfish really. The people who need transfusions are generally in a pretty bad way already and the last thing they need or deserve is a transfusion-aquired infection.
I know the rules seem strict but then we have a duty to ensure that everything possible has been done to make transfusions as safe as possible for the recipient. After all, if you needed a transfusion wouldn't you want this to be so?
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:30,
archived)
I know the rules seem strict but then we have a duty to ensure that everything possible has been done to make transfusions as safe as possible for the recipient. After all, if you needed a transfusion wouldn't you want this to be so?
I usually have that by noon
then again there are more and more units in a pint of lager these days.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:35,
archived)
I don't think it's selfish
If you want to take the risk out of it then you just don't accept blood, the rules are suggesting that a sexuality has some bearing on associated risk- it certainly CAN, but that swings both ways...so to speak.
A heterosexual person who has a risky sexual lifestyle is much more of a risk than a homosexual one who is in a safe and consistant relationship, to suggest otherwise on no other information than their sexuality IS discrimination.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:37,
archived)
A heterosexual person who has a risky sexual lifestyle is much more of a risk than a homosexual one who is in a safe and consistant relationship, to suggest otherwise on no other information than their sexuality IS discrimination.
there is no such rule for bone marrow
i think the logic there is that the need for it is SO high that it cancels out the percieved risk.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:44,
archived)
i'm not allowed either...
as i'm too skinny.
although i'm not THAT skinny, its just that they rely on your bmi, which isn't that accurate a measurement.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:34,
archived)
although i'm not THAT skinny, its just that they rely on your bmi, which isn't that accurate a measurement.
they dont want mine either
but I got one in before they made the rule, so it's a moral victory for me. I have a blood donor card even though I'm not allowed to give blood.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:37,
archived)
My blood was refused on the grounds that I had been in Africa south of the Sahara
Whether I'd had sex or not was not even asked.
Maybe they thought as AIDS is so rife, the drinking water might have been contaminated.
( ,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:42,
archived)
Maybe they thought as AIDS is so rife, the drinking water might have been contaminated.