Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Nope. they were meant to be dropped off at 5am, change on the coach then get to work soon after
they got dropped off around 3am, the coach fucked off, they had to wait there until 5 or 6am and then they were told to get changed on the street and get to work.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:48, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
they got dropped off around 3am, the coach fucked off, they had to wait there until 5 or 6am and then they were told to get changed on the street and get to work.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:48, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
OK, so not actually spending the night under a bridge then?
I do agree it's wrong and bad and shit, but presenting the bare facts would have been better.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:50, Reply)
I do agree it's wrong and bad and shit, but presenting the bare facts would have been better.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:50, Reply)
it's still a pretty shitty way to treat people and something I'd be angry about
there's no need to try and make it sound worse by lying. it's not even The Mail here, it's actually a grown up newspaper.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
there's no need to try and make it sound worse by lying. it's not even The Mail here, it's actually a grown up newspaper.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
No question it's really shit
but no shitter than many other things. Serious 'slow news day' stuff.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:56, Reply)
but no shitter than many other things. Serious 'slow news day' stuff.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:56, Reply)
I've not read either of them. I'm just trying to start an argument on here out of boredom.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
Read both articles, their not rabid at all, they just list the claims and counter claims.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/04/jubilee-pageant-unemployed
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/04/jubilee-pageant-unemployed
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
read my posts and don't attribute monty's words to me
then sod off.
laters.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
then sod off.
laters.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
Are you saying there's something wrong with my words?
WELL ARE YOU?
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:06, Reply)
WELL ARE YOU?
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:06, Reply)
there's something wrong with anyone's words
if they can't distinguish between "there" and "their" and "they're".
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:27, Reply)
if they can't distinguish between "there" and "their" and "they're".
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:27, Reply)
They were told to bed down and sleep under the bridge while they waited for their shift to start.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
I heard they were told to clean chimneys until daylight
and were then flogged if they asked for more gruel. That's what I heard.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
and were then flogged if they asked for more gruel. That's what I heard.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
Meh.
lying story has made me loose interest. this is why I don't read newspapers.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:55, Reply)
lying story has made me loose interest. this is why I don't read newspapers.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:55, Reply)
You don't read newspapers, you read what's said on here without checking the original article
then blame the newspapers.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
then blame the newspapers.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
I read the article
and what was on here. neither gave all the details that Al and you appear to have. none of this changes the fact that newspapers spout biased bollocks, even the ones I agree with. I'll stick to the radio or tv or other sources.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
and what was on here. neither gave all the details that Al and you appear to have. none of this changes the fact that newspapers spout biased bollocks, even the ones I agree with. I'll stick to the radio or tv or other sources.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
Good job the radio and TV are unbiased, then.
It's a weight off my mind and no mistake.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:34, Reply)
It's a weight off my mind and no mistake.
( , Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:34, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread