b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2324757 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

yeah, but they were Stephen King.
You need a reading age of 10 for Stephen King.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:39, 1 reply, 10 years ago)
Oh here she is.
Always pop up to be sly and snide.
You're turning into Rory
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:42, Reply)
Nah, Rory is occasionally funny

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:43, Reply)
Rory wasn't nearly as boring.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:43, Reply)
it's not being snide mate
Stephen King isn't a very good writer and his novels only require a perfunctory reading comprehension level.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:44, Reply)
I think he's a much better writer of long stories
His short ones are a bit shit.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:45, Reply)
other way around, I found
His novels aren't very good. Some of them are so cringey it's funny.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:46, Reply)
I genuinely love The Stand
The proper 1200 page one. I've read it so many times the covers have fallen off and been sellotaped back on again
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:49, Reply)
I've read prolly about a dozen Stephen Kings, but not that one.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:52, Reply)
I'd recommend it
Also the TV mini series was rather good
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:55, Reply)
yeah my Stephen King period ended 20 years ago.
Thanks for the tip though.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:56, Reply)
Must have been a heavy flow

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:56, Reply)
I also liked The Talisman

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:01, Reply)
i just read "under the dome"
which i think is a modernised version, but not sure, as not read "the stand". it was good. as was the one about the jfk assassination.

king is like jilly cooper - total masters of what they do. if you want to sneer at what they do, go for it, but millions of people enjoy it, so it can't be bad.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:58, Reply)
actually, it very much can be bad in spite of being enjoyed by millions
I've never really understood the 'argument' you just put forward.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:00, Reply)
first, you are the self-appointed arbiter of "bad"
and looking at your taste, well, you should sack yourself immediately.

secondly, what is the point of writing? if it is to be read, and to entertain, and to make money, which it is for nearly everyone who writes, then they win.

next?
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:01, Reply)
the point of writing is not to make money.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:02, Reply)
yer
it's to starve in an attic all noble-like.

as if.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
getting paid to do it is nice, granted
But there is no correlation between the quality of the writing and its financial success.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
as judged by whom?
who is assessing this "quality"?
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:06, Reply)
well, you could start with what is studied in academic institutions as a broad rule of thumb

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:08, Reply)
i don't consider where you got your degree to be "academic"
so that stuffs you for starters
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:30, Reply)
I mean all academic institutions across the UK.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:52, Reply)
Like Harry Potter

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:10, Reply)
No I dont

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:14, Reply)
I did however like the irony of the book credited with getting kids reading again
putting a lot of small independent bookshops out of business with supermarkets selling them as a loss leader
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:15, Reply)
neither is it necessarily to entertain

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
yeah, let's ban all writing that is for such a sordid purpose as to entertain, people should never ever enjoy it
let's have only overblown pretentious wank and then we can all be like the emperor's new clothes and pretend to love it on a messageboard.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
I never said to ban it yeah

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:07, Reply)
people write because they want to be read
most people today would rather read stephen king than george eliot
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:22, Reply)
I think you're deliberately overlooking the word 'necessarily'.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:53, Reply)
Alright 'Gary Cranley' nice to see pomposity levels are at an all time high!!!

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:05, Reply)
haha! the most preening pretentious pillock on here, yet he always accuses certain other posters of pretension!
And he forgot to log out before posting about his favourite meal!
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:10, Reply)
UH-OH!!!

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:11, Reply)

orwell.ru/library/essays/wiw/english/e_wiw
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:04, Reply)
it's not mass market shit, therefore it's pretentious wank
tl;dr
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:06, Reply)
Pulp fiction is like pulp telly
it can be enjoyable without being of "artistic merit"
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:14, Reply)
never said it isn't

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:17, Reply)
By that logic
The Jeremy Kyle Show, One Direction and Cheryl Cole are all works of genius.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:07, Reply)
this is the very nub of my gist
Also, The Sun must represent the highest quality journalism.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:12, Reply)
It is often held up as a good example of clear journalistic writing
As is the Daily Mail
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:13, Reply)
Not sure about "clear journalistic writing" but there's absolutely no doubt that it's a very important paper.
You don't fuck with The Sun if you're a politician, certainly.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:25, Reply)
If one of the main points of journalism is to effectively communicate a story, then The Sun does it perfectly.
Often with just a headline, sometimes with help from the first paragraph.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:28, Reply)
apparently writing isn't about story telling or anything fun
can't you read?
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:30, Reply)
Now, now.
Counter or don't. Sardonic sarcasm is unseemly.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:31, Reply)
I read that someone doesn't rate Stephen King as a writer, in spite of his success and popularity.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:32, Reply)
maybe someone is just jealous of success and popularity

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:37, Reply)
I don't deny it's possible, but I don't think that's an obvious conclusion to reach.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:38, Reply)
i repeat... can't you read?

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:42, Reply)
If you read the posts back you will see that the main gist of what he says is "Lol jaysum is well fick"

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:45, Reply)
Yer.
They certainly know their audience and voice.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:30, Reply)
This.
Secret Window Secret Garden is great.

The Shining is well tedious.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:01, Reply)
I mentioned one Stephen King book, the other being made into a movie, and 2 seperate authors.
You're being your usual "hilarious", pedantic, sly, snide self.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:50, Reply)
better snide than sodomised!

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:52, Reply)
Better snide than pride would have worked better

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:54, Reply)
How any man can be proud of sodomising another man is beyond me.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:55, Reply)

yo hi
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:56, Reply)
hahaha

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:01, Reply)
I don't yell from the rooftops whenever I fuck, dear.
I know you would, with it happening so infrequently.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
never since his sister moved away

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:04, Reply)
1998.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:18, Reply)
he'd love to be like his beloved "rorers"
you've just made his week.

granted, your competition was a hamster and not getting his piercings stuck on his watch when he picks his nose. but still.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 12:57, Reply)
click

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:03, Reply)
And another.

(, Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:13, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1