Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
It's a shame there's no people on here who are likely to do this for a random girl they'll never meet from the internet.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:47, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:47, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
I was wondering when you would show up now Amorous badger has been here.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:48, Reply)
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:48, Reply)
venomous choad makes me think that you are claiming to be a pokemon
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:50, Reply)
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:50, Reply)
Poor Blaireu69..
...he got really upset when I said that I hoped nothing nasty happened to his new house.
He stopped pandering at WBM for a whole two minutes he was that upset.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:53, Reply)
...he got really upset when I said that I hoped nothing nasty happened to his new house.
He stopped pandering at WBM for a whole two minutes he was that upset.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:53, Reply)
WBM was FURIOUS.
She nearly got depression and internet lesbianism AGAIN she was that narked.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:59, Reply)
She nearly got depression and internet lesbianism AGAIN she was that narked.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:59, Reply)
score!
I kind of want to reply to JMG's post below, not in an arguing way, but he has a point about it being a dreary debate...quite the dilemma
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:22, Reply)
I kind of want to reply to JMG's post below, not in an arguing way, but he has a point about it being a dreary debate...quite the dilemma
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:22, Reply)
I thought you were Chief JMG cock sucker?
Or something along these lines.
Has the QOTW tide shifted somewhat? I can only assume they're still lying at one another to impress house-whales?
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:51, Reply)
Or something along these lines.
Has the QOTW tide shifted somewhat? I can only assume they're still lying at one another to impress house-whales?
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:51, Reply)
you'll find it a bleaker place now JMG
Psychochomp has had a great deal of influence here. Some are resisting, but the overall apathy is winning through.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:52, Reply)
Psychochomp has had a great deal of influence here. Some are resisting, but the overall apathy is winning through.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:52, Reply)
I hardly had high hopes for QOTW any time in the past.
When you're the shit version of /talk, you've really got nothing going for you.
Shut down QOTW, merge the boards again. I say.
I'm usually correct.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:55, Reply)
When you're the shit version of /talk, you've really got nothing going for you.
Shut down QOTW, merge the boards again. I say.
I'm usually correct.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:55, Reply)
naa, that'd be shit
they are much the same, but the different formats suit different people.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:58, Reply)
they are much the same, but the different formats suit different people.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:58, Reply)
I think you've already forgot how the internet works.
I'm JMG. I'm correct.
Slipping in to nerd mode to ease this process, It's like Top Trumps but with brains.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:05, Reply)
I'm JMG. I'm correct.
Slipping in to nerd mode to ease this process, It's like Top Trumps but with brains.
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:05, Reply)
With each reply you drag the level of QOTW down.
This inane debate pulls down the general level of fun, in my once again correct opinion.
:(
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:12, Reply)
This inane debate pulls down the general level of fun, in my once again correct opinion.
:(
( , Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:12, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread