no real reason

( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:33, archived)

Sooo true!

(thistle, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:34, archived)

abuahi abuahi abuahi abuahi

( My Ass Is On Fire due to constant gas leak, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived)

Haha
woo
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived)

Hahaha

( epiphany MEng (hons) - game over man, game over!!, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived)

Nom
I want that onion ring snack on his head.
(Pua'a ega-ega How much chuck norris could a woodchuck chuck?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived)

if onion rings featured in the eucharist
i'd be more inclined to bother god
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

controversy
Actually, there is debate. Evolutionists think it's onion ring snack. Creationists think it's transform-a-snack. Who really knows.
(Pua'a ega-ega How much chuck norris could a woodchuck chuck?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:44, archived)

In a recent survey
32% of people said it was Transform-a-Snack

21% said it was KP onion rings
16% said it was ASDA onion rings
12% said it was Sainsbury's onion rings
11% said it was Tesco's onion rings
8% said it was onion rings from their local corner shop

Clearly the majority say Transform-a-Snack. The statistics don't lie.
( joefish Are we human - Or are we denser?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived)

also, i saw this book in the window of a charity shop yesterday
my first recursion
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

*is tickled*

( Bee Nice uncharacteristically indistinguishable, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

It's the training manual for new b3tans.
My favourite is page 4 - McCririck.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

Haha, that'll drive them mad

( mediocre Ooh, maxi-big the force is, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:41, archived)

Hahaha
Ungrateful sods!
( XLVII can't even afford a decent sig, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:43, archived)

Hahaha!
Why do we not propose this theory just to make the Christians happy?
Uncompromising cunts :D
( Petehix http://steamcommunity.com/groups/b3ta, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:46, archived)

Lots of Christians do believe this

( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:48, archived)

i've been told (i.e. [citation needed])
that fundamentalist creationism only really got going at the start of the 20th century, primarily as a response to the growing scientific interest in eugenics which a lot of people saw as A Bad Thing
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:55, archived)

Could well be.
Evolution has been rather abused. I don't think religion does itself any favours by arguing so pointlessly against such a strong theory though.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:59, archived)

What amazes me is that given the constant 24 hour cycle of destruction that is the natural world
anybody actually worships this mythological concept

It would quite clearly be a complete psychopath
( Jahled -¦ overworked ¦-, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:01, archived)

have you not watched the lion king?*
it's the circle of life!

i have no problem with anyone who believes in a god. it's the idea that, if god created the entire universe and inspired the entire bible, that the latter should be the primary reference for all truth, despite the fact that the universe is a vastly superior work in every respect. THAT annoys me

*or, if you don't need the concept explained to you by elton john in short words: bambi
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:10, archived)

I worked with a girl who designed props for the stage production off the lion king
and in a single sentence have spouted more reality than all the superstitious beliefs in the world

An ancient Chinese philosopher once said: "If there are ghosts, the highways would be extremely crowded with them"

Which they are not
( Jahled -¦ overworked ¦-, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:19, archived)

i now have an image of a street sweeper with a proton pack
i wish ghosts were real, just so that proton packs could be real
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:31, archived)

Why do you think those sludge-gulper trucks need to have a big round chamber on the back?
The ghosts get washed into the drains, and have to be sucked out by a portable cyclotron.

It's the idea that you could fit one in a backpack that's just utterly preposterous.
( joefish Are we human - Or are we denser?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:09, archived)

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR SCIENCE
WE DON'T NEED:
-PROLONGED LIFE THROUGH MEDICINE AND VARIOUS OTHER THINGS LIKE WATER PURIFICATION
-ENERGY EFFIENCY
-TO KNOW THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE

NOW JUST DICK OFF AND LEAVE US TO OUR THEORY THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE IF WE DO NOTHING BUT TALK TO OUR COLLECTIVE IMAGINARY FRIEND
( Petehix http://steamcommunity.com/groups/b3ta, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:00, archived)

Hahaha

( Jahled -¦ overworked ¦-, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:49, archived)

Arf!

( Bob Todd 's delivering stringbeans to Utah tonight, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:03, archived)

excellent :)

( kingsuperspecial wants wild living, fast, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:04, archived)

FP! FP it hard!

( Bob Todd 's delivering stringbeans to Utah tonight, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:05, archived)

Pfff!
True!
( ClanSoul, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:21, archived)

The thing is,
if they let their preposterous argument just roll over and die and try and put forward a better one,
then that surely counts as evolution.

(Mind you, it's not like circular contradictions seem to bother them).

I was forced to attend this Baptist thing at the weekend. They had a wall picture with lots of little fish the kiddies had stuck on to make the scales of one big fish. The temptation to whip out a pen and draw legs on just one of them was overpowering...
( joefish Are we human - Or are we denser?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:44, archived)

Not really; evolution applies only to living things, not to ideas or inanimate objects.
Ideas can 'evolve', after a fashion, but this isn't the same as the evolution of life.
( Bob Todd 's delivering stringbeans to Utah tonight, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:10, archived)

errrrrrr
no
( dingo_chutney *parp*, Mon 25 Aug 2008, 16:55, archived)

Heh heh
Brills
(Rapscallion is it fashion or disease?, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)

Very much this
but please, stop thinking that everyone with belief is a fringe looney, the spread of looneys within religion is much the same as that without.
( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 24 Aug 2008, 16:00, archived)

i concur
but creationism in particular is daft
( spacefish sparky... i am your oboe..., Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:41, archived)

Yes, this.
The world's problems are caused by fundamentalists, whatever creed they belong to. Most people of any faith, or of no faith at all, are a credit to the human race. It's the nutcases who make the most noise that are the problem.

Did I just say that "most people... are a credit to the human race"? I must be insane.
( The Hedgehog From Hell hey, "pirates" sounds like "pi rates" or pie rats", Sun 24 Aug 2008, 20:05, archived)

Yes
Of course something that created billions of galaxies wants primates to bolster its' lack of self esteem by praising it.
( namdrah Full of broken thoughts..., Mon 25 Aug 2008, 15:11, archived)

Come on,
I hate the bastard insignificant lot of you, but any bit of praise makes me glow all day.
( Rev. A-MOL is lurking around these parts again, Mon 25 Aug 2008, 18:58, archived)

Right on the money with that one
Woos and Yays galore
(Super Jet Shoes, Mon 25 Aug 2008, 21:55, archived)

I LIKE THIS!
I LIKE YOU!
(The If has remembered this site., Tue 26 Aug 2008, 3:12, archived)

I approve of this
I don't understand why some people think a belief in evolution and a belief in God are mutually exclusive. I've read Genesis; it sounds pretty much like a metaphor for evolution to me.

Also, woo.
(Dr Chalkwitheringlicktacklefeff you can't stick your knob in a great personality, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 12:16, archived)