b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2327538 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Voting rarely doesn't seem a big ask of members.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:25, 2 replies, latest was 10 years ago)
You don't think volunteering to forfeit a day's pay and pissing off your employer during difficult economic times, when you are both struggling and in fear of losing your job is a big deal?

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:28, Reply)
He just said that didn't he?

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:29, Reply)
Y'know, I'm not sure now.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:30, Reply)
I never was, most of the posts so far are a bit 'tl;dr' for me, so I don't know what anyone has said

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:32, Reply)
alright

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:36, Reply)
^JUDBMLSP

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:39, Reply)
Clickin' dis

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:40, Reply)
boo fucking hoo
welcome to the private sector. or, as everyone outside 1970 calls it, the REAL world.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:33, Reply)
Ah yes, we should level down instead of levelling up.
Prick.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:33, Reply)
you look at union members and think that is going upwards?
what are you, an amoeba?
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:35, Reply)
I'm saying that it would be better for all these amazing benefits you believe public sector workers have to be extended to private sector workers, not vice versa
Do you really struggle this much with reading comprehension?
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:39, Reply)
no, i struggle with thinking that this is the way to build businesses
you're a small company, you can't afford to pay your staff any more/give them more holidays/private healthcare, but hey - they've all voted to make you close down for 2 days next week anyway. that'll make loads more money.

the post office strikers were classic. look, our employer's on its knees, let's kick the corpse a bit.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:47, Reply)
You think it would be bad for business to treat employees fairly?
Do you think that people enjoy striking?
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:54, Reply)
i don't care what they enjoy
it's work. you are there to do a job. if you don't like it, plenty of other people need a job.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:56, Reply)
That's true, there is always the option of living like a king on benefits.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:57, Reply)
i've seen that on channel 5
they are loving it
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:00, Reply)
I believe this month it is immigrants who are living the high life

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:12, Reply)
They vote by post I thought?

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:38, Reply)
I'm unclear as to what your original point was.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:40, Reply)
I have no problem with unions striking for fair pay if they can prove a majority of their members want to strike.
50% turnout seems reasonable.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:46, Reply)
But the point is the more governments legislate to undermine the unions, the less likely people are to turn out to vote.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:50, Reply)
That's the unions problem.
If they can't get support from the people they're sure to be helping, they're not great.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:56, Reply)
No it doesnt but a lot of members accept that the voters speak for them without having to vote.
My main point though is that it is a classic Tory tactic to deflect the attention away from the reason for the strike back onto the strikers to avoid having to deal with the cause.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:29, Reply)
Too fucking right that a minimum of 50% of members need to vote. Most of these cunts are public sector workers or a version thereof e.g. tube drivers.
Most of the pay/pension structures that the unions are bitching about now weren't enacted by the Tories.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:39, Reply)
Oh they probably shouldn't complain then

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:44, Reply)
Well, they probably shouldn't blame people that weren't responsible just because they're Tories.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:45, Reply)
don't be deliberately obtuse.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:05, Reply)
Well I don't understand the relevance of your point.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:10, Reply)
But the tories aren't the unions friends.
Calling it "a classic tactic" doesn't mean anything.
It's the tories perogative to keep unions at bay, and unions job to keep members engaged. That's politics.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:45, Reply)
Except the Tories have the power to change the rules, making it harder for the unions to keep their members engaged.
Look at young AA down there, he's grown up thinking that groups representing the interests of workers are somehow a bad thing.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:52, Reply)
I see.
Well, the government have been voted in by a majority, so that's what the people want from their government. But they're also from a low turn out vote. So, I guess I have to apologise and back track to, if you hold unions to a minimum vote, then you must also hold all elections to the same standard.

I still am not sure about unions, but I can accept that it should be one rule for all.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 10:59, Reply)
governments may have a majority of MPs but it's incredibly rare that they have a majority of votes.
And that's putting to one side the fact that a 40% turnout is good.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:01, Reply)
I understand that,
The way it works is not ideal.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:13, Reply)
The Tories got about 35% of the vote at the last election.

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:02, Reply)
That's more than a third,
3 big parties plus independents, makes a majority.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:15, Reply)
The second party got roughly a third as well
Of a two thirds turnout.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:17, Reply)
10.7m voters out of 47.5m registered voters for the Tories.
In a country with a population of 64.1m.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:21, Reply)
Unions work to represent the interests of their members
Big businesses have far more influence over a lot of government policy than the electorate.
(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:03, Reply)
Fair point well made

(, Fri 18 Jul 2014, 11:04, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1