To anyone on QOTW who still gives a shit
Here is your new ignore list^^^^

To all the /[s]talkers who replied, thank you for reminding me and everyone else, ONLINE, precisely why your little corner of the internet is such a miserable hive of cunts.

It's perfectly natural to see someone like me as a cunt. To proper cunts, I am indeed a cunt.
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 5:09, 6 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

Ringing the ignore bell right here.

( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 12:55, Reply)

CLANG CLANG ON THE IGNORE BELL
( weaver., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:03, Reply)

( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:07, Reply)

Why am I looking at a picture of
YM?
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:23, Reply)

You're being more pathetic that we are, you prick.

( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:08, Reply)

I love it
Keep it going, I'm almost there
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:29, Reply)

[MOD EDIT] Stop baiting this prick.
( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:09, Reply)

Two possibilities
1) Mike is pretending to be to be a mod
2) A mod doesn't agree with me, but lacks the balls to reveal himself.

If it's 2) then please don't hold back. I'm really not a prick once you get to know me, but that'll never happen if you insist on hiding.
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:22, Reply)

Hello Chart Cat
Why are you so upset by pixels? Perhaps you might like to step away from the computer for a little while? Maybe take a walk? Sure, it's raining today but Autumn is so beautiful, don't you think?

Then, when you're all refreshed and calm and ruddy-cheeked, you'll be able to sit down at your computer and realise that you're taking this all a bit too seriously.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:31, Reply)

Thanks for the first eloquent reply
There's hope for /talk yet. Ah, the old 'pixels on a screen' chestnut. Like they're somehow different to vibrating air molecules or pigment on pulped wood. Perhaps you could explain why pixels are different?
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:36, Reply)

Perhaps you could explain why it hurts?
As far as I can see, Badger has made no threats and no malicious intent. He's not being a horrific bully, he's just pointing out the obvious bollocks in QOTW and holding it up for ridicule - much the same as Mike woz ere did for /talk.

If pixels threaten your family, your peace of mind or stalk you THEN they are horrible harmful things. If they just tease you for being a bit of a cockend, then they aren't. It's very easy not to be upset by them, you just don't read them. Easy.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:55, Reply)

Perhaps you're right
and for the sake of balance, there ought to be a way to flag disgraceful failures for the benefit of everyone. What grinds my gears is that it's being done by someone who has contributed nothing but cheap criticism to QOTW for as long as I can remember.

You know how there's always one arsehole in every group who corrects every mistake, picks up on every insignificant detail in an attempt to raise his own profile at the expense of the others? That's AB. I don't think that deserves celebration, but then, I'm not a cunt.
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:11, Reply)

Why would someone contribute something worthwhile
to something they see as wholly unworthwhile?
(rnuk http://flickr.com/rnuk, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:14, Reply)

I don't think he's trying to raise his own profile at all.
He's just trying to give everyone a laugh and for the most part, it's worked. Almost every list will contain elements of bias. I really don't think he's pushing any particular agenda, just showing people the idiocy of some of the posts on QoTW. Granted, not all of them are equally hilarious but that's just what arises when something like this is made.
( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:17, Reply)

Mike, Badger is a horrid nasty bully and that is that.

( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:19, Reply)

You really feel that he has some sort of vendetta don't you.
He really doesn't. He just finds it amusing to post the worst of the answers - and he gets sent them more often than not by people who post more on QOTW than anywhere else on b3ta. He doesn't sit there night after night searching every nook and corner of QOTW you know.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:18, Reply)

In all fairness, I gazzed most of them to him.

(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:22, Reply)

Just out of interest...
...do you read and enjoy Speak You're Braanes or Lamebook?

Does this image amuse you?


( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:15, Reply)

Tbh I hadn't heard of either
A quick glance reveals them to be a bit like your list. Oh, right. You're testing if I'm a massive hypocrite by liking sites with a similar thrust.

I know exactly what you're *trying* to do with that archive, I'm just not so sure you're hitting the nail squarely on the head. I endorse the idea of a fail archive, but not one which has a specific anti-/$board agenda. That's why I have a problem with your list. It's just too biased.
( chart cat has an itch, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:41, Reply)

How is it biased?
Surely your perception of 'funny made up bollocks' and 'unfunny made up bollocks' is going to be subjective, and therefore not necessarily the opinion of everyone.

Mike already does the same for /talk by the way, but don't let that fact interfere with your self-righteous mutterings.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Sun 1 Nov 2009, 16:03, Reply)

Self-righteous!
Like being the self-appointed maintainer of a 'failure' list, you mean? The point *I'm* trying to make is quite the opposite of self-righteousness. Look it up if you don't believe me.

Mike's list is by /talk, for /talk. I have no problem with that. Instead of hitting the relatively fluffy QOTWers, assemble a /board failure list instead. See how that works out for you.
( chart cat has an itch, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:34, Reply)

Why on earth should QOTW be exempt? It's fair game, like the rest of b3ta.
I'm not even sure what point you think you are trying to make here. I don't even think you know yourself to be honest. Let's break it down into manageable chunks so you can get your head round things, visit your original position on the argument and see whether that point was still valid, or whether you are going to have to shift your perspective.

Mike's list is /talk failures. He has posted on /talk. He picked some, was sent others and if you will note, even I am on there. It's fucking ace.

Badger's list is QOTW failures. He has posted on QOTW (if you bothered to remove your head from your arse for a nanosecond you would know that). He picked some, and was sent others. I am not on there, but I do think it is fucking ace.

It has amused everyone apart from you and maybe one or two others - and yet you think you are somehow 'speaking for the masses'. You're very obviously not, as you should have been able to tell by the lack of interest in your 'war on /talk'.

Hence my comment that you are being self-righteous. Would you prefer that I called you a pompous prick? No?

I have no doubt that someone will set up a list of /board failures, but you have to understand that it is a bit of a mammoth task to compile the list of shittery that it would entail. This is why Mike stuck to /talk and Badger to QOTW - it's simply too much effort to tackle more than one board and both /talk and QOTW have slightly more shite to pick from.

There. Relatively painless, no? Of course, you can maintain your original position and carry on pissing round your little corner of the internet to stop the bigger boys playing there, but you're going to look a bit daft - and whilst you look daft, there'll be terrible bullies laughing at you.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:57, Reply)

*yawn*
Really tired with having to explain stuff to you. Re-read it.

EDIT: What's all this about a war on /talk too? HAHAHA! I just said I wanted a war*, I never mentioned /talk. You lot... honestly.

*It was tongue in cheek too. Comedy rage. I didn't really want a war. I'm pointing this out explicitly so you don't, you know, get it wrong again
( chart cat has an itch, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:52, Reply)

Oh dear, I really expected a slightly more intelligent response.
Sadly not. Shame. You really are a pompous prick after all :(
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 18:01, Reply)

You're the one who wants me
to write a personalised summary for you. If you're too lazy to read back and interpret for yourself, I doubt anything I say or do will help. And dearest, if you want an intelligent response it's best not to use such a condescending tone. You know what that means don't you? It means talking down to someone :) *pats head*

Most hilariously, absolutely everything of which I've been accused by the /talk rabble + friends has, without exception, been the overriding attribute displayed by the accuser in every case. It's quite extraordinary how deluded some people can be.
( chart cat has an itch, Tue 3 Nov 2009, 2:29, Reply)

Dude
spEak You're bRanes is funny as fuck.

You should really let it go, just because someone else on here thinks that your mate Spanky's QOTW material is abject shite and lists the very worst of his egocentric fantasising, doesn't mean you have to wade in as a proud defender of the truth.

You're the only person that cares.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 16:59, Reply)

pwnt

(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 17:10, Reply)

fo srs

( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 19:27, Reply)

Just because someone on here
thinks your mate's archive is misguided shite and lists the very worst of his egocentric judgement, doesn't mean you and the /talk militia have to wade in as proud defenders either.

You're not the only person that cares, which makes it even funnier.
( chart cat has an itch, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:02, Reply)

I hate to break it to you darling
but that poster there isn't from /talk. They read QOTW.

Please remember to read profiles before casting judgement, it stops you looking like a tit.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:58, Reply)

Oh dear
I didn't accuse him of the heinous crime of being from /talk.

Read it again love. As you say, it would have stopped you from "looking like a tit".
( chart cat has an itch, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:49, Reply)

Pfft.
Nice ninja edit there.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 18:02, Reply)

Oh FFS
You didn't read it properly. Man up and back down, it's okay to be wrong sometimes. I don't need to do ninja edits, I just read things, formulate a response and write an airtight reply. It's much more efficient.

Go me.
( chart cat has an itch, Tue 3 Nov 2009, 2:26, Reply)

/talk militia? My mate?
I've never shown any mateyness to the Badger/ Banshee, what are you talking about? He's got just as much right to have a fail list as you do to throw your weight around in defence of your mate Spanky.

And I have never posted on /talk, I'm a confirmed QOTWer, just another one that thinks Spanky is shit.

What's your problem dude?
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 17:21, Reply)

*double sigh*
As I said above, I never said *you* were from /talk. Christ, can't any of you cunts read?

It's satire. What I did was to take your reply, change a few words and use it against you. It's a classic comedy device. I'm not claiming any of the facts I made are any truer than the source material I borrowed. You've no idea if me and Spanky are mates or not either, but you don't see me whining about that trivial detail.
( chart cat has an itch, Tue 3 Nov 2009, 2:25, Reply)

I'm very familiar with satire
And re. my use of the word 'mates', I''m pretty sure you, Pooflake and Spanky are self-congratulatory 'mates' with your QOTW replies. That's what I meant.

Militia! Come join me! Today we march on QOTW!

Chortle.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Tue 3 Nov 2009, 8:40, Reply)

I got a mention!...

Woo!
( Pooflake braces for an onslaught..., Thu 5 Nov 2009, 13:45, Reply)

DON'T FORGET TO IGNORE ME!

(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:05, Reply)