So, you think disabled people are amusing? Something less than human, perhaps?
Do you point and laugh at cripples in the street?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:29, Share, Reply)
Do you point and laugh at cripples in the street?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:29, Share, Reply)
Wait.......a /talk regular attempting to take the moral high ground?
O_o
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:31, Share, Reply)
O_o
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:31, Share, Reply)
Shush it you.
I didn't say The Gays were some sort of disableds, so you got NO cause to step in here.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:35, Share, Reply)
I didn't say The Gays were some sort of disableds, so you got NO cause to step in here.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:35, Share, Reply)
Also, just cos /talk are LOVELY, that don't mean we GOT to love YOU.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:36, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:36, Share, Reply)
COME ON! WE HAVEN'T GOT ALL DAY! ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:14, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:14, Share, Reply)
yeeeeahh
so they're saying being obese is a disability. I disagree, although the cause may be a mental disability. But as soon as you say that then what about alcoholics? Or people who murder too much? What stupid times we live in. I say name and shame these fatties into losing weight.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:04, Share, Reply)
so they're saying being obese is a disability. I disagree, although the cause may be a mental disability. But as soon as you say that then what about alcoholics? Or people who murder too much? What stupid times we live in. I say name and shame these fatties into losing weight.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:04, Share, Reply)
Yeah.
As if murdering too much could even possibly be a real thing.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:08, Share, Reply)
As if murdering too much could even possibly be a real thing.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:08, Share, Reply)
or buy them a muumuu
Speaking of muumuu:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-30484034
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:09, Share, Reply)
Speaking of muumuu:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-30484034
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:09, Share, Reply)
It's just Gluttony
One of the seven deadly sins Gluttony was first defined by the Egyptian Monk Evagius Ponticus as "anxiety about one's health, or becoming ill". Perversely in some people this anxiety can cause them to to overeat presumably because they are overly afraid of starving. Conversely gluttony can mean for some people that they stopping eating altogether. So Morbid Obesity and Anorexia are pretty much the same thing -Gluttony - an insane reaction to fear of illness or death. They are very much mental disorders as "normal" well balanced people don't react to this fear of illness/death in such an insane way.
Evagius died in 399AD so overeating or anorexia are not new phenomena. Being a little overweight or slightly obsessive about being thin/exercising are just mild versions of the same mental disorder. Taking it to morbid extremes is without doubt a mental disability and needs corrective psychological treatment. The question in this case perhaps ought to be - should insane people be allowed to care for children? People don't like being called insane, but that's what they really are - if you habitually act in an insane way you are by definition insane.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:05, Share, Reply)
One of the seven deadly sins Gluttony was first defined by the Egyptian Monk Evagius Ponticus as "anxiety about one's health, or becoming ill". Perversely in some people this anxiety can cause them to to overeat presumably because they are overly afraid of starving. Conversely gluttony can mean for some people that they stopping eating altogether. So Morbid Obesity and Anorexia are pretty much the same thing -Gluttony - an insane reaction to fear of illness or death. They are very much mental disorders as "normal" well balanced people don't react to this fear of illness/death in such an insane way.
Evagius died in 399AD so overeating or anorexia are not new phenomena. Being a little overweight or slightly obsessive about being thin/exercising are just mild versions of the same mental disorder. Taking it to morbid extremes is without doubt a mental disability and needs corrective psychological treatment. The question in this case perhaps ought to be - should insane people be allowed to care for children? People don't like being called insane, but that's what they really are - if you habitually act in an insane way you are by definition insane.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:05, Share, Reply)
"I believe it will also cause friction in the workplace between obese people and other workers."
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:14, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:14, Share, Reply)
It causes friction when you have to sit next to one of these fat people on a bus or the train
literally
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:21, Share, Reply)
literally
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:21, Share, Reply)
Here's a devil's advocate response...
How much effort did you have to put into not eating shit loads of crap and being enormous? My guess, like me, not much. When I see morbidly obese people, I just wonder what is it in their brains that didn't say, as I would, "fuck, I've had too much". I don't find it that difficult, personally. I know when I've had enough crap food.
Similarly with people like Peter Hitchens, who aren't addicted to drugs and wonder why drug addicts choose to be "such a way", I wonder how much effort do they, as a non addict, have to put being a "non" addict.
I'm not expert, but I think addiction research would point towards it being more psychological, in that some brains are more susceptible to consuming behaviour.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:32, Share, Reply)
How much effort did you have to put into not eating shit loads of crap and being enormous? My guess, like me, not much. When I see morbidly obese people, I just wonder what is it in their brains that didn't say, as I would, "fuck, I've had too much". I don't find it that difficult, personally. I know when I've had enough crap food.
Similarly with people like Peter Hitchens, who aren't addicted to drugs and wonder why drug addicts choose to be "such a way", I wonder how much effort do they, as a non addict, have to put being a "non" addict.
I'm not expert, but I think addiction research would point towards it being more psychological, in that some brains are more susceptible to consuming behaviour.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:32, Share, Reply)
Yeah, but Peter Hitchens doesn't NEED drugs, because he's got TEAM RABID BATS living in his brain, chomping on his synapses.
GO TEAM RABID BATS!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:46, Share, Reply)
GO TEAM RABID BATS!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:46, Share, Reply)
I think that's broadly true.
Though after my experiences in dealing with/speaking to professionals there has to be a point where addicts actually take responsibility for their behaviour. A classic addict behaviour is to rewrite truths to paint themselves as 'innocent victims'.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:52, Share, Reply)
Though after my experiences in dealing with/speaking to professionals there has to be a point where addicts actually take responsibility for their behaviour. A classic addict behaviour is to rewrite truths to paint themselves as 'innocent victims'.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:52, Share, Reply)
Oh I'm sure will power and taking responsibility is colossal in battling any kind of addiction
But at the same time, I just wonder if the reason I'm not morbidly obese isn't because I work harder at not being obese, if that makes sense. Maybe I have less of an addictive personality.
I could be very wrong.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:11, Share, Reply)
But at the same time, I just wonder if the reason I'm not morbidly obese isn't because I work harder at not being obese, if that makes sense. Maybe I have less of an addictive personality.
I could be very wrong.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:11, Share, Reply)
There is sometimes a financial element.
Cheap food tends to be crap food.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:57, Share, Reply)
Cheap food tends to be crap food.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:57, Share, Reply)
I don't believe this. I am aware how cheap frozen pizzas &c can be.
You can make healthy meals for the same price. You just need the time, knowledge & inclination to cook.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:01, Share, Reply)
You can make healthy meals for the same price. You just need the time, knowledge & inclination to cook.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:01, Share, Reply)
Yes, but in terms of "how much effort does it take...",
expensive ready meals are okay for you, cheap ones are terrible.
Laziness is worse for you if you can't afford the expensive option.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:09, Share, Reply)
expensive ready meals are okay for you, cheap ones are terrible.
Laziness is worse for you if you can't afford the expensive option.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:09, Share, Reply)
Oh, yes, totally agree with you there.
Though that does rather sidestep the initial point.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:18, Share, Reply)
Though that does rather sidestep the initial point.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:18, Share, Reply)
Expensive ready meals are just expensive
There was research done by Which? a few years back that showed than many of the expensive ready meals were just as full of crap, if not more crap, than the cheap ones. In some cases the cheapo ones worked out better for you.
IMHO - it is all crap. "Instant food" is just re-heated rubbish massively over priced. Is it really that hard to make up a big pot of chill con carni and then freeze it up in pots oneself?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 18:31, Share, Reply)
There was research done by Which? a few years back that showed than many of the expensive ready meals were just as full of crap, if not more crap, than the cheap ones. In some cases the cheapo ones worked out better for you.
IMHO - it is all crap. "Instant food" is just re-heated rubbish massively over priced. Is it really that hard to make up a big pot of chill con carni and then freeze it up in pots oneself?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 18:31, Share, Reply)
I bow to your better judgement.
I was just going on how grim the baking tray gets.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:27, Share, Reply)
I was just going on how grim the baking tray gets.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:27, Share, Reply)
Ahem...
johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/custard-creams-are-cheaper-than-cous-cous-but-you-cant-expect-a-fucking-baroness-to-know-that/
It starts: "Anyone who claims that healthy food is a cheaper option has clearly never enjoyed the dubious nutitional delights of a pack of Everyday Value Custard Creams (35p, 1,972 calories).
They’ve also probably never been to a supermarket. Or at least never been to a supermarket with less than a tenner to last until the end of the week and two kids to feed. This hasn’t stopped a string of pompous twats from appearing in the media this week and telling us how much better they would be at being poor than the plebs using foodbanks."
And then gets into details.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:30, Share, Reply)
johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/custard-creams-are-cheaper-than-cous-cous-but-you-cant-expect-a-fucking-baroness-to-know-that/
It starts: "Anyone who claims that healthy food is a cheaper option has clearly never enjoyed the dubious nutitional delights of a pack of Everyday Value Custard Creams (35p, 1,972 calories).
They’ve also probably never been to a supermarket. Or at least never been to a supermarket with less than a tenner to last until the end of the week and two kids to feed. This hasn’t stopped a string of pompous twats from appearing in the media this week and telling us how much better they would be at being poor than the plebs using foodbanks."
And then gets into details.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:30, Share, Reply)
Although I avoid sugar, I am well aware how cheap custard creams are, and cheap, mass-produced food is usually loaded with sugar.
I don't know who wrote that blog, but some extremely carefully cherry-picked examples there. The paragraph about meatfree being no cheaper is based on some well-dodgy assumptions too.
He's right about well-off columnists patronising plebs with their poverty-toursim, though.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:46, Share, Reply)
I don't know who wrote that blog, but some extremely carefully cherry-picked examples there. The paragraph about meatfree being no cheaper is based on some well-dodgy assumptions too.
He's right about well-off columnists patronising plebs with their poverty-toursim, though.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:46, Share, Reply)
I think I'm with Tabs on that
It's possible to eat very healthily, very cheaply if you know what you're doing.
You'd only ever buy a cheap ready meal that's high in saturated fat through laziness.
Fuck, I've done it plenty.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:13, Share, Reply)
It's possible to eat very healthily, very cheaply if you know what you're doing.
You'd only ever buy a cheap ready meal that's high in saturated fat through laziness.
Fuck, I've done it plenty.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:13, Share, Reply)
It's not possible to eat very healthy on a very tight budget.
Healthy protein is pricey. You can eat half decent though.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 22:42, Share, Reply)
Healthy protein is pricey. You can eat half decent though.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 22:42, Share, Reply)
Hahahaha
"One parent said on Facebook that Mrs McPhee had "put me off taking my children to church just in case something else gets said"
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:01, Share, Reply)
"One parent said on Facebook that Mrs McPhee had "put me off taking my children to church just in case something else gets said"
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:01, Share, Reply)
YES! AMEN! SHUT UP HEATHENS!
CHRISTMAS IS A TIME FOR SILENT REFLECTION ON THE BIRTH OF LITTLE BABY JESUS AND THE TORMENTS HE ENDURED DYING ON THE CROSS FOR OUR SINS!
NOW SCOURGE YOURSELF AND EAT A MOUTHFUL OF ASHES! REPENT! FOR IF NOT FOR HIS SUFFERING YOU WOULD SURELY BE ETERNALLY DAMNED!
AMEN!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:04, Share, Reply)
CHRISTMAS IS A TIME FOR SILENT REFLECTION ON THE BIRTH OF LITTLE BABY JESUS AND THE TORMENTS HE ENDURED DYING ON THE CROSS FOR OUR SINS!
NOW SCOURGE YOURSELF AND EAT A MOUTHFUL OF ASHES! REPENT! FOR IF NOT FOR HIS SUFFERING YOU WOULD SURELY BE ETERNALLY DAMNED!
AMEN!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:04, Share, Reply)
It's true!!
It's all about the Gold, Frankenstein and Grrrr!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:08, Share, Reply)
It's all about the Gold, Frankenstein and Grrrr!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:08, Share, Reply)
That would turn your body into a WMD
One guff would take out most of Europe
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:35, Share, Reply)
One guff would take out most of Europe
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:35, Share, Reply)
"I'm not going to let the arrival of the son of God spoil my Christmas!"
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:22, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:22, Share, Reply)
I'm sure this happens every year.
Newspapers feed off the 'Oh, the fucking irony' reaction
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 19:37, Share, Reply)
Newspapers feed off the 'Oh, the fucking irony' reaction
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 19:37, Share, Reply)
delete this please.
I don't want to be bombed by a country that can't even feed it's own people properly.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:35, Share, Reply)
I don't want to be bombed by a country that can't even feed it's own people properly.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:35, Share, Reply)
I shall not!
Bugger Kim Jong Ding Dong up his turdpipe! Team Sony!!!1!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:42, Share, Reply)
Bugger Kim Jong Ding Dong up his turdpipe! Team Sony!!!1!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:42, Share, Reply)
one of my favorite films that
especially the part where the main guy vomits all over the place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKqGXeX9LhQ
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:56, Share, Reply)
especially the part where the main guy vomits all over the place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKqGXeX9LhQ
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:56, Share, Reply)
:o/
www.nbcnews.com/news/world/north-korea-behind-sony-hack-u-s-officials-n270451
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:40, Share, Reply)
www.nbcnews.com/news/world/north-korea-behind-sony-hack-u-s-officials-n270451
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:40, Share, Reply)
YouTube Comment Reconstruction Finale
NSFW
Probably GC, NSFW due to swearing.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:18, Share, Reply)
Probably GC, NSFW due to swearing.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:18, Share, Reply)
yeah was a bit obvious
just sounds funny when an old bloke says it for some reason
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:38, Share, Reply)
just sounds funny when an old bloke says it for some reason
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:38, Share, Reply)
If any of you have been listening to the podcast Serial, you might find this funny.
If you don't know what I'm talking about, you won't find it funny at all.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:03, Share, Reply)
If you don't know what I'm talking about, you won't find it funny at all.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:03, Share, Reply)
I love Serial. Wait, no time for this. The final episode is up!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
LOLZ
was it you who posted the first link on here to Serial, whoever it was, thanks, i muchly liked it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 17:53, Share, Reply)
was it you who posted the first link on here to Serial, whoever it was, thanks, i muchly liked it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 17:53, Share, Reply)
Sounds like psychic software if it can determine how I move my mouse
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:55, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:55, Share, Reply)
'monitor size'
How the fuck does a website know how big my monitor is?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:04, Share, Reply)
How the fuck does a website know how big my monitor is?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:04, Share, Reply)
Resolution the browser is running at.
Not so much physical dimensions although I guess you could infer that. Fingerprinting of the sort described has been around for ages and is already used by lots of companies to tailor advertising, research, demographics etc.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:16, Share, Reply)
Not so much physical dimensions although I guess you could infer that. Fingerprinting of the sort described has been around for ages and is already used by lots of companies to tailor advertising, research, demographics etc.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:16, Share, Reply)
<script type="text/javascript">
Not just the resolution of the browser window (window.innerHeight) which will just report the size of the inner frame but "window.screen" will get the whole screen resolution too. Well, the monitor your browser is primarily running on anyway - it won't report multiple monitor setups.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:26, Share, Reply)
Not just the resolution of the browser window (window.innerHeight) which will just report the size of the inner frame but "window.screen" will get the whole screen resolution too. Well, the monitor your browser is primarily running on anyway - it won't report multiple monitor setups.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:26, Share, Reply)
Fun link to determine how "unique" your browser is
panopticlick.eff.org/
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:58, Share, Reply)
panopticlick.eff.org/
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:58, Share, Reply)
To be fair I think
the whole network traffic of b3ta would die down to just a few hits a day.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:01, Share, Reply)
the whole network traffic of b3ta would die down to just a few hits a day.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:01, Share, Reply)
i'd probably have to do some work
so I couldn't agree more
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:20, Share, Reply)
so I couldn't agree more
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:20, Share, Reply)
I was going to post this earlier, but seems relevant now
How some Swedish vigilantes* are tracing, tracking and exposingtrolls online bullies
www.technologyreview.com/photoessay/533426/the-troll-hunters/?utm_campaign=newsletters&utm_source=newsletter-daily-all&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20141218
*depends on PoV
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:27, Share, Reply)
How some Swedish vigilantes* are tracing, tracking and exposing
www.technologyreview.com/photoessay/533426/the-troll-hunters/?utm_campaign=newsletters&utm_source=newsletter-daily-all&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20141218
*depends on PoV
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:27, Share, Reply)
Disqus and Facebook have the user data,
which is far more likely to flag up potential trolls than the small bits of information which they could get by looking at the browser info.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:44, Share, Reply)
which is far more likely to flag up potential trolls than the small bits of information which they could get by looking at the browser info.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:44, Share, Reply)
yeah but would you want to login to b3ta with
your Facebook account?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:50, Share, Reply)
your Facebook account?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:50, Share, Reply)
What a frightening thought.
Imagine you did it by accident? (chills)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
Imagine you did it by accident? (chills)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
Rather that than trust Trustev with my details!
They'd probably add up my IP numbers, divide by 7, and see if an odd number is more or less likely to be a troll.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:05, Share, Reply)
They'd probably add up my IP numbers, divide by 7, and see if an odd number is more or less likely to be a troll.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:05, Share, Reply)
Yeah, that totally could not be abused to silence dissenting voices across multiple platforms at all...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:51, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:51, Share, Reply)
This isn't a joke video, or a parody. "Beta as fuck"
*facepalm*
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:46, Share, Reply)
*facepalm*
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:46, Share, Reply)
"I'm a baiter. I'm a baiter. We're both baiter as fuck"?
What strange tongue is this?
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 10:25, Share, Reply)
What strange tongue is this?
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 10:25, Share, Reply)
raccons are they native?
I made this!
raccoon spotted in Newcastle
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
raccoon spotted in Newcastle
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
Russell Brand replies to the open letter.
Now I'm generally not a fan of this bloke, but his letter back to the "cold paella" bloke is rather good. Worth a read.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:23, Share, Reply)
Now I'm generally not a fan of this bloke, but his letter back to the "cold paella" bloke is rather good. Worth a read.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:23, Share, Reply)
That surprised me
That was well-written indeed. Didn't feel as pretentious as a lot of his stuff.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:27, Share, Reply)
That was well-written indeed. Didn't feel as pretentious as a lot of his stuff.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:27, Share, Reply)
I too find myself warming to Russell Brand over all of this
Just illustrates how contemptuous City workers are. What's the betting he's a contractor? Probably pays fuck all tax.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:33, Share, Reply)
Just illustrates how contemptuous City workers are. What's the betting he's a contractor? Probably pays fuck all tax.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:33, Share, Reply)
That's the best stuff he's ever written.
If he keeps going like that I may start to have some respect for him (as long as he drops that pseudo-babble he comes out with).
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:35, Share, Reply)
If he keeps going like that I may start to have some respect for him (as long as he drops that pseudo-babble he comes out with).
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:35, Share, Reply)
He's not pushing book sales of that book in any way is he
He still fails to grasp turning up without an appointment never really works, especially as the workingmen he wanted to confront, who he said says he’d never knowingly keep from their dinner, were probably extremely busy people and probably above engaging with a moron, promoting their latest book
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
He still fails to grasp turning up without an appointment never really works, especially as the workingmen he wanted to confront, who he said says he’d never knowingly keep from their dinner, were probably extremely busy people and probably above engaging with a moron, promoting their latest book
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
If it's for a film, as he says,
they probably want to show how inaccessible the bosses are - so having the door slammed in your face is one way to do that.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:52, Share, Reply)
they probably want to show how inaccessible the bosses are - so having the door slammed in your face is one way to do that.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:52, Share, Reply)
but, even if they did agree an interview, this is a man who lives in his own world...
dismissing graphs as tools the establishment use to bamboozle the proletariat.
I honestly think if they sat him in front of someone who totally knows their onions, and doesn't allow him to move the goal posts around, he'd shit his pants.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
dismissing graphs as tools the establishment use to bamboozle the proletariat.
I honestly think if they sat him in front of someone who totally knows their onions, and doesn't allow him to move the goal posts around, he'd shit his pants.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:03, Share, Reply)
For example... the blog article states that the sale of RBS will probably recoup the bailout AND make a profit...
now, I'm not just going to take that as gospel because I read it on a blog, but if it's true then a lot of the argument falls on its arse.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:05, Share, Reply)
now, I'm not just going to take that as gospel because I read it on a blog, but if it's true then a lot of the argument falls on its arse.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:05, Share, Reply)
My fear would be that there is no one there
who does know what they are on about (or, at least, would be honest about it).
Sadly, a documentary on economics presented by a professor would be unlikely to get the punters in.
I imagine Michael Winterbottom will not shy away from showing Brand's own foibles (of which there a many - the graphs thing being a good example), as his films are rarely flattering.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:16, Share, Reply)
who does know what they are on about (or, at least, would be honest about it).
Sadly, a documentary on economics presented by a professor would be unlikely to get the punters in.
I imagine Michael Winterbottom will not shy away from showing Brand's own foibles (of which there a many - the graphs thing being a good example), as his films are rarely flattering.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:16, Share, Reply)
"Remember in the riots when disaffected youth nicked the odd bottle of water or a stray pair of trainers? "
Not quite how I remembered it - I remember innocent people fleeing their burning homes, people being assaulted in the street by gangs of looters and thugs, a guy being knocked off his moped and beaten while someone else rode off on it, posing in photos of their swiped goodies while family businesses were razed to the ground, a young kid being robbed while he bled...
They weren't disaffected or poor, they were opportunist thieves and thugs who saw their chance to cause chaos and went for it. So fucking what if some of them got a hefty slap for their crimes?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
Not quite how I remembered it - I remember innocent people fleeing their burning homes, people being assaulted in the street by gangs of looters and thugs, a guy being knocked off his moped and beaten while someone else rode off on it, posing in photos of their swiped goodies while family businesses were razed to the ground, a young kid being robbed while he bled...
They weren't disaffected or poor, they were opportunist thieves and thugs who saw their chance to cause chaos and went for it. So fucking what if some of them got a hefty slap for their crimes?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:40, Share, Reply)
Brand does rather make a light point of the riots, in which people died.
But the point about the looters/bankers is a good one to make, I think. I'm no fan of his constant ranting, but it does appear to be bringing the stories to the front pages. And he appears to be doing it out of altruism and not to flog his book.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:45, Share, Reply)
But the point about the looters/bankers is a good one to make, I think. I'm no fan of his constant ranting, but it does appear to be bringing the stories to the front pages. And he appears to be doing it out of altruism and not to flog his book.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:45, Share, Reply)
He's like Michael Moore when he was popular.
I know it's just pop culture, but ranting about the ills of the world shouldn't become a virtue to be celebrated in it's own right. Yeah it's cathartic - we all do it. But let's not accept it as a substitute for thinking about things seriously.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:49, Share, Reply)
I know it's just pop culture, but ranting about the ills of the world shouldn't become a virtue to be celebrated in it's own right. Yeah it's cathartic - we all do it. But let's not accept it as a substitute for thinking about things seriously.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:49, Share, Reply)
No. No he isn't.
Because Michael Moore wasn't anywhere near as an annoying, self-promoting prick. Plus Michael Moore actually did proper research, and had valid arguments without resorting to words that he didn't fully understand the meaning of himself, in order to wrong-foot people.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:07, Share, Reply)
Because Michael Moore wasn't anywhere near as an annoying, self-promoting prick. Plus Michael Moore actually did proper research, and had valid arguments without resorting to words that he didn't fully understand the meaning of himself, in order to wrong-foot people.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:07, Share, Reply)
I don't think he is saying the looters should not have been charged.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:56, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:56, Share, Reply)
I just think he picked a bad example
by saying "the odd bottle of water and stray pair of trainers" he's willfully glossing over situation that was far, far worse. As Fray said up there, people died in those riots, homes were destroyed and a lot of innocent people suffered. Whether you agree with his politics or not, it's just wrong of him to write that.
If someone said that the Hillsborough disaster was "just a bit of argy bargy" then they'd be ripped to shreds.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:21, Share, Reply)
by saying "the odd bottle of water and stray pair of trainers" he's willfully glossing over situation that was far, far worse. As Fray said up there, people died in those riots, homes were destroyed and a lot of innocent people suffered. Whether you agree with his politics or not, it's just wrong of him to write that.
If someone said that the Hillsborough disaster was "just a bit of argy bargy" then they'd be ripped to shreds.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:21, Share, Reply)
Except he HAS said that.
He flat out stated at the time that it "Would be wrong to stifle their (the looters') individuality, and their creative approach to venting their frustrations by jailing them."
That was Brand, about a week after the riots.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:12, Share, Reply)
He flat out stated at the time that it "Would be wrong to stifle their (the looters') individuality, and their creative approach to venting their frustrations by jailing them."
That was Brand, about a week after the riots.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:12, Share, Reply)
Where are you getting that quote from?
Not saying he doesn't say some daft shit, but I can't find any reference to that one.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:36, Share, Reply)
Not saying he doesn't say some daft shit, but I can't find any reference to that one.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:36, Share, Reply)
Nah, I just made it up.
:D
Hell, I figured if that cunt Brand can just make up facts out of thin air to justify his arguments, why not do the same?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:44, Share, Reply)
:D
Hell, I figured if that cunt Brand can just make up facts out of thin air to justify his arguments, why not do the same?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:44, Share, Reply)
fair play for researching it... sets us apart form the animals...
THE ANIMALS, I TELLS YA!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:34, Share, Reply)
THE ANIMALS, I TELLS YA!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 16:34, Share, Reply)
nicely
he's getting better at talking it seems, less of the wordy nonsense helps get the point across for everyone
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:44, Share, Reply)
he's getting better at talking it seems, less of the wordy nonsense helps get the point across for everyone
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:44, Share, Reply)
Not clicking on that.
Russell Brand is a complete cunt. And if I were in charge he'd have been sent to the camps years ago. Oh, and in case you've all forgotten, what with him being the populist voice of hipster cunts everywhere these days, HE USED TO PICK UP HIS PAYCHECK FROM RUPERT FUCKING MURDOCH!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:02, Share, Reply)
Russell Brand is a complete cunt. And if I were in charge he'd have been sent to the camps years ago. Oh, and in case you've all forgotten, what with him being the populist voice of hipster cunts everywhere these days, HE USED TO PICK UP HIS PAYCHECK FROM RUPERT FUCKING MURDOCH!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:02, Share, Reply)
the main sticking point for me, on this whole thing, is the fact he sells his book through amazon...
... then bitches about companies - like amazon - dodging taxes.
Why not make the point of having the book ONLY sold in independent bookstores?! That alone would have been picked up by the press, giving him a fuck load of publicity.
I personally agree with the sentiment of (a sizeable amount of) his rhetoric... but I think the way he goes about it goes nowhere to change the minds of those who think he's a self-serving egotistical fuckstick.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:10, Share, Reply)
... then bitches about companies - like amazon - dodging taxes.
Why not make the point of having the book ONLY sold in independent bookstores?! That alone would have been picked up by the press, giving him a fuck load of publicity.
I personally agree with the sentiment of (a sizeable amount of) his rhetoric... but I think the way he goes about it goes nowhere to change the minds of those who think he's a self-serving egotistical fuckstick.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:10, Share, Reply)
Private Eye pointed out a couple of weeks back that his publishers are also tax-dodgers.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:12, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:12, Share, Reply)
Hi media company is making a film about Brand, taking money from investment bankers and premier league footballs as a tax write off too.
According to the mail.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2813868/Russell-Brand-s-film-company-received-cash-injection-city-bankers.html
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:25, Share, Reply)
According to the mail.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2813868/Russell-Brand-s-film-company-received-cash-injection-city-bankers.html
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:25, Share, Reply)
Five words, two swears, two exclamation marks: Sachsgate!
FUCKING HANG THE CUNT!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:16, Share, Reply)
FUCKING HANG THE CUNT!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:16, Share, Reply)
I don't object to him personally
But he doesn't have a leg to stand on until he gets his own affairs in order and lives by his own rules. For people like him it's always someone else's responsibility and there's always some reason why their hypocrisy is acceptable.
"My millions aren't part of the problem, I don't count because of x / my comparitively priviliged existence is acceptable because of x"
That's fine, I'm not saying you should give it up. You are.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:23, Share, Reply)
But he doesn't have a leg to stand on until he gets his own affairs in order and lives by his own rules. For people like him it's always someone else's responsibility and there's always some reason why their hypocrisy is acceptable.
"My millions aren't part of the problem, I don't count because of x / my comparitively priviliged existence is acceptable because of x"
That's fine, I'm not saying you should give it up. You are.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:23, Share, Reply)
What if Russel Brand were a spider?
Would you send him to the camps then??? Well?? Didn't think so.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:24, Share, Reply)
Would you send him to the camps then??? Well?? Didn't think so.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:24, Share, Reply)
(^(^;;^)^) TEAM SPIDERS WOULD ELIMINATE HIM FOR THE GOOD OF SPIDERATY!
(^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:30, Share, Reply)
(^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:30, Share, Reply)
Why do so many people on here hysterically hate Russell Brand so much?
Yes he's irritating and pretentious and a hypocrite but in a week where over a hundred children have been murdered in a school he's not done anything actually that awful.
and as for the "lock 'em all up" attitude regarding the riots:
https://domesticempire.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/broken-britain-riots/
if the rioters deserve a hefty slap for their crimes what do the other pair deserve?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:51, Share, Reply)
Yes he's irritating and pretentious and a hypocrite but in a week where over a hundred children have been murdered in a school he's not done anything actually that awful.
and as for the "lock 'em all up" attitude regarding the riots:
https://domesticempire.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/broken-britain-riots/
if the rioters deserve a hefty slap for their crimes what do the other pair deserve?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:51, Share, Reply)
So, your argument is: "Russell Brand is OK because he hasn't murdered kids?".... right
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 12:06, Share, Reply)
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 12:06, Share, Reply)
yep
So untwist your knickers and go do something more useful instead
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 12:54, Share, Reply)
So untwist your knickers and go do something more useful instead
( , Fri 19 Dec 2014, 12:54, Share, Reply)
Not even wronglols.
I'm going to see if this guy has any other stuff out there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:41, Share, Reply)
I'm going to see if this guy has any other stuff out there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:41, Share, Reply)
quite a bit it seems. I might have to get his album 100% half assed
the first time I saw the Downs bit, I laughed myself silly. his timing and ideas fucking killed me
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:43, Share, Reply)
the first time I saw the Downs bit, I laughed myself silly. his timing and ideas fucking killed me
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 15:43, Share, Reply)
Hahahaha
I'm thinking of starting a fundraising campaign for the DSA, I think I'll call it the haircut bucket challenge.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:41, Share, Reply)
I'm thinking of starting a fundraising campaign for the DSA, I think I'll call it the haircut bucket challenge.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:41, Share, Reply)
Well going by the cross section of Germans i've met i'm going to say fisting.
*clicks link*
Yup.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:51, Share, Reply)
*clicks link*
Yup.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:51, Share, Reply)
While we're on the subject of spoof fillums...
...here's the master at work. Leslie Nielsen in Wrongfully Accused (parody of The Fugitive). Some great scenes in this film including the Usual Suspects homage in the fishing shop.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:29, Share, Reply)
...here's the master at work. Leslie Nielsen in Wrongfully Accused (parody of The Fugitive). Some great scenes in this film including the Usual Suspects homage in the fishing shop.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:29, Share, Reply)
HAHAHA
I laughed way more then I really wanted to at that.
Love the giving the change part. Silly is right up my street
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:33, Share, Reply)
I laughed way more then I really wanted to at that.
Love the giving the change part. Silly is right up my street
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:33, Share, Reply)
As per the ancient prophesy of Saint Bong Crisby it is vital that we ensure it is a White Squidmas
I made this!
Grand High Space Arch Vicar Stewart explains what this means for you. It is very important that you pay attention.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
Grand High Space Arch Vicar Stewart explains what this means for you. It is very important that you pay attention.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
Careful now, you're going to get such a duffing up by lil kim cyber minions.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:54, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:54, Share, Reply)
Dunno why they caved in.
They should have released it anyway, and then got to work on a hilarious sequel where a tinpot dictatorship gets all angry and hacks a movie studio.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:16, Share, Reply)
They should have released it anyway, and then got to work on a hilarious sequel where a tinpot dictatorship gets all angry and hacks a movie studio.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:16, Share, Reply)
Oh I see now
Being a knobclit to everyone who don't think the same way
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:29, Share, Reply)
Being a knobclit to everyone who don't think the same way
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:29, Share, Reply)
No when I said it was a classy comedy
I meant, it's not a comedy at all. That scene doesn't look funny to me.
But clearly you have another point to make?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:35, Share, Reply)
I meant, it's not a comedy at all. That scene doesn't look funny to me.
But clearly you have another point to make?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:35, Share, Reply)
I was hoping the people's moral guardians, Anonymous, would hack Kim's computers and replace all his porn with pictures of carrots or something
Nice death scene though, it's like the producers really meant it
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:05, Share, Reply)
Nice death scene though, it's like the producers really meant it
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:05, Share, Reply)
^this^
where are anonymous when freedom of speech is being stamped on?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
where are anonymous when freedom of speech is being stamped on?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
If there's 'context' behind this scene, I'd like to know what it is.
Death scenes in comedies (as this film is being portrayed) are generally a laughable series of accidents (see Hot Shots, and of the Leslie Nielsen spoofs). This doesn't seem to follow the rules very well, despite being rather good SFX.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
Death scenes in comedies (as this film is being portrayed) are generally a laughable series of accidents (see Hot Shots, and of the Leslie Nielsen spoofs). This doesn't seem to follow the rules very well, despite being rather good SFX.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
That's a good point
I guess they just really wanted to drag out the "WE'RE KILLING KIM JONG UN LOL!" gag.
Couldn't give much of a fuck to be honest; not really a big fan of the Seth Rogen gang style of comedy.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:34, Share, Reply)
I guess they just really wanted to drag out the "WE'RE KILLING KIM JONG UN LOL!" gag.
Couldn't give much of a fuck to be honest; not really a big fan of the Seth Rogen gang style of comedy.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:34, Share, Reply)
Sony Pulls "The Interview"
To be honest, I think Sony deserve everything they got for that film. Think of it the other way around, if North Korea made a film about assassinating Obama, they would of been firing the nukes in minutes.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:28, Share, Reply)
To be honest, I think Sony deserve everything they got for that film. Think of it the other way around, if North Korea made a film about assassinating Obama, they would of been firing the nukes in minutes.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:28, Share, Reply)
yes
they would
I'm obviously over exhagurating by saying "firing the nukes" assuming people wouldn't be as stupid on here to take that literally, but they wouldn't allow it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:39, Share, Reply)
they would
I'm obviously over exhagurating by saying "firing the nukes" assuming people wouldn't be as stupid on here to take that literally, but they wouldn't allow it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:39, Share, Reply)
North Korea
pumps out anti American propaganda all the time. No one "fires the nukes" or anything like it. They ignore it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Share, Reply)
pumps out anti American propaganda all the time. No one "fires the nukes" or anything like it. They ignore it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Share, Reply)
How many blockbusters have they released to the entire world
about assassinating their president?
Maybe I missed it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:44, Share, Reply)
about assassinating their president?
Maybe I missed it.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:44, Share, Reply)
It was that one little bit of DPRK cinema
that you haven't watched yet, right?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Share, Reply)
that you haven't watched yet, right?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Share, Reply)
thank you...
i was about to post this, but then i realised that your point is making no difference to the crazy!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:08, Share, Reply)
i was about to post this, but then i realised that your point is making no difference to the crazy!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:08, Share, Reply)
nope
massively popular I can see, clearly had some stars in that.
I'm guessing your definition of blockbuster differs from mine.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
massively popular I can see, clearly had some stars in that.
I'm guessing your definition of blockbuster differs from mine.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:20, Share, Reply)
Yes.
Great film, and it was a big deal at the time despite not being a "blockbuster".
I'm not sure that the Interview would've qualified as a blockbuster either, though...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:22, Share, Reply)
Great film, and it was a big deal at the time despite not being a "blockbuster".
I'm not sure that the Interview would've qualified as a blockbuster either, though...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:22, Share, Reply)
"firing the nukes in minutes" or not giving a fuck?
Also sony employees have had their personal details stolen and released making them potential victims of fraud.
I don't think they deserved that just because someone made fun of lil kim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:35, Share, Reply)
Also sony employees have had their personal details stolen and released making them potential victims of fraud.
I don't think they deserved that just because someone made fun of lil kim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:35, Share, Reply)
yeah right!
all you have to do is making a joking threat on twitter and you'll get legal action.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:38, Share, Reply)
all you have to do is making a joking threat on twitter and you'll get legal action.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:38, Share, Reply)
Go and try it
write one about David Cameron, in the name of science.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:41, Share, Reply)
write one about David Cameron, in the name of science.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:41, Share, Reply)
Ok define "Joking threat on Twitter" then
Ok, if Obama doesn't stop bombing brown people with his drone army of darkness then I hope he stubs his toe really badly.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:48, Share, Reply)
Ok, if Obama doesn't stop bombing brown people with his drone army of darkness then I hope he stubs his toe really badly.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:48, Share, Reply)
Oh you mean saying something like "I've placed a bomb in the building" and sending it to someone?
Because that's straining the definition of joke.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:55, Share, Reply)
Because that's straining the definition of joke.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:55, Share, Reply)
do you understand the concept of exhaguration?
Clearly as this film involves the killing of someone in quite a graphic way, see the post above. Although it may be lolworthy to us lot, it isn't for them and for a film like that to be released by Sony to the entire world, it might be seen as a tad provocative.
Now with that in mind, the threat would have to be something that would insinuate that you would want to take someone elses life who also happens to be of importance. Preferably not mentioning defecating monkeys or whatever as that would probably change the tone of the tweet, not that you would fit that in.
And "straining the definition of joke" is the entire remit of most people on this site, just FYI.
Also: You do know that the hackers offered to redact staff personal details?
www.theverge.com/2014/12/15/7394703/sony-hacker-email-promises-christmas-gift-of-leaked-data-offer-to-redact-data
I'm not sure how much was released by that point, but still.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:00, Share, Reply)
Clearly as this film involves the killing of someone in quite a graphic way, see the post above. Although it may be lolworthy to us lot, it isn't for them and for a film like that to be released by Sony to the entire world, it might be seen as a tad provocative.
Now with that in mind, the threat would have to be something that would insinuate that you would want to take someone elses life who also happens to be of importance. Preferably not mentioning defecating monkeys or whatever as that would probably change the tone of the tweet, not that you would fit that in.
And "straining the definition of joke" is the entire remit of most people on this site, just FYI.
Also: You do know that the hackers offered to redact staff personal details?
www.theverge.com/2014/12/15/7394703/sony-hacker-email-promises-christmas-gift-of-leaked-data-offer-to-redact-data
I'm not sure how much was released by that point, but still.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:00, Share, Reply)
its best not to patronise someone
with the definition of a word which you cannot spell.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:17, Share, Reply)
with the definition of a word which you cannot spell.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:17, Share, Reply)
Dear Mr Hackers, please can you not sell my personal, employment & medical details?
Pretty please?
Gawd bless em and their hearts of gold.
I presume any of the thousands of Sony employees that fail to get in touch with the hackers is fair game then?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:26, Share, Reply)
Pretty please?
Gawd bless em and their hearts of gold.
I presume any of the thousands of Sony employees that fail to get in touch with the hackers is fair game then?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:26, Share, Reply)
Well, I don't know how they would of executed that
but they still offered it.
Yeah they are fair game, it's a war fought out in digital space, and as with any war, there is collateral damage.
Sony only pulled the film because theaters pulled out apparently. They weren't concerned enough about the personal details of their staff to protect them adequately in the first place or stop the film prior to that.
Although it was a pretty ruthless hack, I'm sure they could of done more to protect the data.
mashable.com/2014/12/02/sony-hack-passwords/
Security hasn't been one of Sony's strong points as of late.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:34, Share, Reply)
but they still offered it.
Yeah they are fair game, it's a war fought out in digital space, and as with any war, there is collateral damage.
Sony only pulled the film because theaters pulled out apparently. They weren't concerned enough about the personal details of their staff to protect them adequately in the first place or stop the film prior to that.
Although it was a pretty ruthless hack, I'm sure they could of done more to protect the data.
mashable.com/2014/12/02/sony-hack-passwords/
Security hasn't been one of Sony's strong points as of late.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:34, Share, Reply)
They workers are fair game? You total and utter pillock of the highest order.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:38, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:38, Share, Reply)
No seriously, Sony employs over 140,000 people and you think they're fair game?
The personal details of those employees is now in the hands of hackers or the N Korean state.
Names and addresses
Employment records.
Medical records
Bank details
Any you think they deserve all that? Because "This is war"
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:49, Share, Reply)
The personal details of those employees is now in the hands of hackers or the N Korean state.
Names and addresses
Employment records.
Medical records
Bank details
Any you think they deserve all that? Because "This is war"
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:49, Share, Reply)
I think I've made my point
I don't have much more to add.
Hacking is fucked up, I work in IT security and I'm a programmer but I've never wanted to hack anyone as I don't agree with it.
they were warned
they ignored warnings
their lack of IT security didn't protect their staffs data adequately enough
they stubbornly continued to ignore further warnings
they finally caved in for the wrong reasons
The security of the staffs data should of been Sony's priority, but unfortunately it wasn't.
BTW, Sony Pictures was hacked, not the entirety of Sony.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:59, Share, Reply)
I don't have much more to add.
Hacking is fucked up, I work in IT security and I'm a programmer but I've never wanted to hack anyone as I don't agree with it.
they were warned
they ignored warnings
their lack of IT security didn't protect their staffs data adequately enough
they stubbornly continued to ignore further warnings
they finally caved in for the wrong reasons
The security of the staffs data should of been Sony's priority, but unfortunately it wasn't.
BTW, Sony Pictures was hacked, not the entirety of Sony.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:59, Share, Reply)
There you go again.
Your words are unambiguous, yet it's my reading of them that's at fault?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:56, Share, Reply)
Your words are unambiguous, yet it's my reading of them that's at fault?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:56, Share, Reply)
Yup
You can read, not sure you can understand much though to be honest.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:59, Share, Reply)
You can read, not sure you can understand much though to be honest.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:59, Share, Reply)
Now it's my fault that your point (if you actually have one) isn't clear.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:12, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:12, Share, Reply)
"The security of the staffs data should of been Sony's priority, but unfortunately it wasn't."
So you're blaming the victims because Sony didn't have strong enough security to stand up to a nation states cyber warfare program?
Nice bit of blame relocation there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:49, Share, Reply)
So you're blaming the victims because Sony didn't have strong enough security to stand up to a nation states cyber warfare program?
Nice bit of blame relocation there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:49, Share, Reply)
I'm not blaming the victims at all
But if you want to get technical, who do you think secures their data? That will be staff who work for Sony. It's also responsibility of the staff not to use retarded passwords which only makes hacking easier.
Nice bit of completely missing the point in anything I say there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:57, Share, Reply)
But if you want to get technical, who do you think secures their data? That will be staff who work for Sony. It's also responsibility of the staff not to use retarded passwords which only makes hacking easier.
Nice bit of completely missing the point in anything I say there.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:57, Share, Reply)
Ah the old "Make a post then put them on Ignore and get the last word gambit", pretty childish.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:07, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:07, Share, Reply)
You'll excuse me if I don't give them a standing ovation for that magnanimous gesture.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:38, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:38, Share, Reply)
OK.
If David Cameron doesn't try and push through legislation to make the mooning of bus drivers mandatory on Thursdays, I'll send a team of highly trained poo-throwing gibbons to Chequers on Boxing Day to mock him and the smoothness of his chin.
I look forward to hearing from lawyers.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:49, Share, Reply)
If David Cameron doesn't try and push through legislation to make the mooning of bus drivers mandatory on Thursdays, I'll send a team of highly trained poo-throwing gibbons to Chequers on Boxing Day to mock him and the smoothness of his chin.
I look forward to hearing from lawyers.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:49, Share, Reply)
haha!!
strap Go Pros on them and you have a new film for Sony
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Share, Reply)
strap Go Pros on them and you have a new film for Sony
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Share, Reply)
Remember Frank Drebin and Naked Gun series
No-one kicked up fuss then, especially when Frank ended up on top of the Queen. Brilliant stuff.
Kim Jong Un acts like a child as he's not been allowed to grow up.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Share, Reply)
No-one kicked up fuss then, especially when Frank ended up on top of the Queen. Brilliant stuff.
Kim Jong Un acts like a child as he's not been allowed to grow up.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Share, Reply)
I think our relationship
with America is a little different. And the Queen doesn't rule anymore btw ;)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:45, Share, Reply)
with America is a little different. And the Queen doesn't rule anymore btw ;)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:45, Share, Reply)
Is she not? Then why does the PM need to ask her permission to desolve parliament?
She's also head of the armed forces and justice courts act in her name.
Sounds like she's in charge to me.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:47, Share, Reply)
She's also head of the armed forces and justice courts act in her name.
Sounds like she's in charge to me.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:47, Share, Reply)
archaic laws perhaps
that's hardly relevant, she isn't making daily decisions on the direction of the nation anymore.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:51, Share, Reply)
that's hardly relevant, she isn't making daily decisions on the direction of the nation anymore.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:51, Share, Reply)
Of course it's relevant.
She only choses not to exercise them because it would cause a constitutional crises.
When Charlie get's in he may well have other ideas.
Of have we become a republic without me noticing?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:53, Share, Reply)
She only choses not to exercise them because it would cause a constitutional crises.
When Charlie get's in he may well have other ideas.
Of have we become a republic without me noticing?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:53, Share, Reply)
So...
she is de jure in charge, but de facto not actually in charge.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:15, Share, Reply)
she is de jure in charge, but de facto not actually in charge.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:15, Share, Reply)
Didn't de jure have a hit in the 80's with baby I want your love thing?
As far as I can gather she's technically in charge but choses not to exercise that power because it would cause massive problems.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:20, Share, Reply)
As far as I can gather she's technically in charge but choses not to exercise that power because it would cause massive problems.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:20, Share, Reply)
Yes, but no-one here gets upset if they see films of Cameron or Osborne getting blown up
But we can get a bit upperty regarding the royal family.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:13, Share, Reply)
But we can get a bit upperty regarding the royal family.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 12:13, Share, Reply)
I read the opening as "With theater chains defecating en masse..."
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:53, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:53, Share, Reply)
What I don't understand is, why are Sony such pussies about it?
Why not just release the film, along with an open letter to the DPRK taking the absolute piss?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:00, Share, Reply)
Why not just release the film, along with an open letter to the DPRK taking the absolute piss?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:00, Share, Reply)
Probably because of the amount it would cost them?
the amount of data they allegedly have would cause serious damage to Sony.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:02, Share, Reply)
the amount of data they allegedly have would cause serious damage to Sony.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:02, Share, Reply)
because this way they can generate more hype
and they can kill the remaining ad budget (multi millions) because they don't need it...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:11, Share, Reply)
and they can kill the remaining ad budget (multi millions) because they don't need it...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:11, Share, Reply)
lol what a dick
you clearly haven't a clue how much this has cost sony to make the ad budget on the film irrelevant.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:19, Share, Reply)
you clearly haven't a clue how much this has cost sony to make the ad budget on the film irrelevant.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:19, Share, Reply)
the advertising budget
on modern motion pictures is often in excess of the production budget of the movie...
it's nice that the schools have broken up for christmas... but maybe you should do something more productive with your time...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:22, Share, Reply)
on modern motion pictures is often in excess of the production budget of the movie...
it's nice that the schools have broken up for christmas... but maybe you should do something more productive with your time...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:22, Share, Reply)
It's funny how this works
You remember that whole "You cannot show Mohammed in a cartoon" thing?
South Park did it ages ago and no-one gave a fuck. They even referenced this in a later episode.
In order to give a fuck it needs to be shoved in front of someone's face on a big red "Get Angry" plate
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
You remember that whole "You cannot show Mohammed in a cartoon" thing?
South Park did it ages ago and no-one gave a fuck. They even referenced this in a later episode.
In order to give a fuck it needs to be shoved in front of someone's face on a big red "Get Angry" plate
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
oh right?
www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2010/apr/22/south-park-censored-fatwa-muhammad
That you mean?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:09, Share, Reply)
www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2010/apr/22/south-park-censored-fatwa-muhammad
That you mean?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:09, Share, Reply)
Well that was a puppet though to be fair
nowhere near as graphic as the above video.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
nowhere near as graphic as the above video.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:07, Share, Reply)
It's probably some clever South Koreans doing all the hacking who want the US to start fighting with NK to allow SK to storm north.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:03, Share, Reply)
North Korea
made the threat prior to the hacking, they got what they were promised essentially.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:11, Share, Reply)
made the threat prior to the hacking, they got what they were promised essentially.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:11, Share, Reply)
I guess the question is whether it's NK directly or just an independant group who decided to "stick it the man."
It could have been a script kiddy in Romania for all the security they had to defeat.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:20, Share, Reply)
It could have been a script kiddy in Romania for all the security they had to defeat.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 14:20, Share, Reply)
Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup! Firkinfedup!
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:17, Share, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 13:17, Share, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »